Hypergamy (Levels)

[KimmurielParticipant 480]

http://amoraladvice.blogspot.com/2016/11/hypergamy-theres-levels-to-this-s~~~.html

My take on it. Your thoughts, fellow deplorables.

"You meet a few exceedingly forsaken, Sit around the cooler refusing domestication" Aesop Rock

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

I would say that the concept of levels isn’t really relevant. I’d be more inclined to suggest a spectrum.

To wit: a woman of high sexual attraction with a poor father figure will will be nearly guaranteed to trade up from a man man of low desirability to a better one. That’s the worst end of the spectrum. But as any one of the following is true: the woman’s physical desirability goes down, the strength of her paternal relationship goes up and the value of the man she has goes up… the less likely she is to exercise her hypergamy instinct.

This whole exercise stinks of unicorn hunting, though. So for any man looking to find a unicorn, here’s your hunting ground: she is sexually unappealing and is really tight with her dad… and you are wealthy and good looking. You find that ugly woman and offer her wealth, security and the right to claim you as her lover and she will transfer her father worship onto you and never leave. Have fun with your security!

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Stargazer wrote:

I would say that the concept of levels isn’t really relevant. I’d be more inclined to suggest a spectrum.

That was my initial thoughts. There is scale and every woman falls somewhere on it.

I doubt there is any evidence to support this and it is all speculation.

All I need is my awareness of it and when it shows up I recognize it.

Before MGTOW it was not even on my radar but now I see it everywhere.

It’s like they are waiting for their men to fail some made-up metric and use it as an excuse to monkey branch.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

I don’t consider “levels” of any concept like Hypergamy or MGTOW, you either are or you are not.

Women are biologically and socially programmed to be hypergamous, to seek out the best protector/provider to provide for and protect her and her offspring, and in the abstract there’s nothing wrong with that. After all what mother wouldn’t want a safe and comfortable life for herself and her child.

Men in the same way are programmed to seek out young, fit, healthy and fertile women with a strong mothering instinct to ensure the best chance of survival for their progeny and let’s be honest have said progeny in the first place, noone in their right mind wants to mate with a landwhale after all.

The problem as always stems from the fact that our gynocentric society has imbalanced the exchange against the male in the equation right from the foundation to the point that women’s rampant hypergamy is considered “strong and independent” while even basic standards on the part of men are considered misogynist at best. Women want all the benefits of Mr 6′ tall, dark and handsome, 6-figure salary Chad while offering nothing of substance in return.

Were it the case that standards on both sides were accepted as a natural desire to ensure the best foundation for an actual symbiotic relationship, women actually tried to meet men’s standards them and in the event of her deciding to move on to a “better” man only took what she brought to the first relationship and reached reasonable arrangements for ensuring any children are properly raised I for one don’t believe we’d be in anything like the societal s~~~hole we are now.

What actually happens is that want want to take the children, 50+% of the assets including the house, the car and even the dog to act as her “buy in” to the next relationship, hiding behind the pretense that she’s a woman of her own means rather than the parasite she is. The only logical response to such blatant misandry is MGTOW, sow the wind and all that.

[JVBParticipant]

Mmmmmm not to sure I agree. Know some bitches raised in a perfectly solid/balanced upbringing and are 100% no 3. My point is AWALT.

Peace is > piece.

[experiencedParticipant]

Society’s view is that if a man’s stupid enough to marry a poor ugly girl, he is immediately brought toward her level and her to his. Saving a damsel lasts only until she has discovered that She Owns Half.
“But he didn’t do anything wrong.” Doesn’t matter in no fault divorce. What he did wrong was to be a fool enough to marry, today.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[KimmurielParticipant 480]

experienced wrote:

Society’s view is that if a man’s stupid enough to marry a poor ugly girl, he is immediately brought toward her level and her to his. Saving a damsel lasts only until she has discovered that She Owns Half.
“But he didn’t do anything wrong.” Doesn’t matter in no fault divorce. What he did wrong was to be a fool enough to marry, today.

Exactly. A feminist tried to tell me how women were oppressed cuz dowrys were like a slave trade and that it was blah blah blah.

My only thought was “there was once a time when a free market trade concept applied to marriage and not this Nazi bulls~~~ we call “love?”

"You meet a few exceedingly forsaken, Sit around the cooler refusing domestication" Aesop Rock

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Kimmuriel wrote:

Exactly. A feminist tried to tell me how women were oppressed cuz dowrys were like a slave trade and that it was blah blah blah.
My only thought was “there was once a time when a free market trade concept applied to marriage and not this Nazi bulls~~~ we call “love?”

So, we went from a time where a woman brought assets into the relationship to a time where a woman typically brings debts into the relationship and gets most of the assets if she decides to leave. Tell me again how women are oppressed?

Order the good wine

[KimmurielParticipant 480]

Yep thats why the last paragraph alludes to them being like locusts: they “shop til they drop” and consume until there is no more. They can’t go backwards and reflect like we can. They’re obsessive and petty.

"You meet a few exceedingly forsaken, Sit around the cooler refusing domestication" Aesop Rock

[Anonymous 0]

experienced wrote:

Saving a damsel lasts only until she has discovered that She Owns Half.

That it in a nutshell

TaxGuy wrote:

Kimmuriel wrote:

So, we went from a time where a woman brought assets into the relationship to a time where a woman typically brings debts into the relationship and gets most of the assets if she decides to leave. Tell me again how women are oppressed?

Very profound. I wish more guys saw it that way.

[Author]

Posts