Hypergamy circa 1 million BC

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

http://www.psmag.com/nature-and-technology/17-to-1-reproductive-success?utm_source=goodmenproject.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pubexchange_module

Looks like females are hard wired to do their s~~~.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 7]

I think its something like women only date the top twenty percent of men, while men would date top 60 percent, in a social media based study.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

When it comes to breeding, women are not hypergamous. They will breed with any criminal, violent, low-life, drug dealer, thug who treats them like crap. Multiple times.

If “status” were a deciding factor for women to spread their legs, there would be better mating decisions being made. Hypergamy is when she’s looking for the best (and dumbest) idiot she can extract resources from to support her bastard spawn.

•••••

Breeding is only the pinnacle of success for animals. The human male has far more important s~~~ to congratulate himself for – like inventing agriculture as pointed out in that article.

I impregnated two women in my life and they didn’t even have the kid. So what. The accomplishment? I squirted in two females. Big whoop. I actually squirted in more females than that, but I don’t consider it a huge accomplishment like a woman does “OMG CONGRATULATIONS!!!! YOU HAVE UNPROTECTED SEX!!!!! YOU SHOULD BE SHOWERED WITH GIFTS NOW!!!!”

Look at the bulls~~~ term they use: “reproductive success”. That’s why women think about birthing like a trip to the moon because that’s the BEST they are ever gonna do. Here’s a woman with “reproductive success”. You would need a small army of men just to feed her parasitic ass and all 15 her poor kids.

Rats, c~~~roaches and chickens “reproduce” too. And because it’s not an “accomplishment” that requires any real skill, dedication, or amazing super-human feats human males are capable of… a man shouldn’t feel like he’s short-changed if the opportunity doesn’t present itself.

“I don’t have time for a wife and an airplane”
– Wilbur Wright.

My cousin had “reproductive success”. 3 kids.
First one died of leukemia when she was 7.

Reproducing is not a measure of success. Keep your daughter off the pole and make sure she doesn’t turn into f~~~ing Miley Cyrus and even THAT’s not “success”. That’s just making sure she doesn’t turn into a disaster.

I am so f~~~ing tired of women congratulating themselves as if having unprotected sex and punching out a womb turd is something they should be congratulated for – before they do a god damn thing apart from ordering in restaurants and spreading their legs.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 3]

There was no dating until maybe 60 or so years ago. And even then, it was still mostly courtship and arranged marriages.

Dating didn’t take off until birth control and destroying the traditional Judeo-Christian morality structure.

Like most things, the government likes to lie about statistics, but here’s a good article:

http://www1.cmc.edu/pages/faculty/welliott/Sexrevns.htm

91% of women were virgins at marriage back in 1900. And considering America practiced monogamy, that means the article OP states is a bit questionable.

Fact of the matter is that monogamous societies utterly decimated the other ones. That’s why it’s been the dominant cultural model. I have no doubts the current decadent West is going to find itself in collapse sooner rather than later too.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Anonymous wrote:

Fact of the matter is that monogamous societies utterly decimated the other ones. That’s why it’s been the dominant cultural model. I have no doubts the current decadent West is going to find itself in collapse sooner rather than later too.

For obvious reasons. Men would work however hard they need to and even give their life for a loving, loyal woman whom they shared a special bond with, especially if she was the mother of their children.

The way today’s society is, the only love and loyalty most women have is to money, and considering the amount of partners most of them have before they want to marry, they aren’t sharing anything special with you, they just want to be taken care of and think a beat up vagina has the same value as a virgin. The fact that a lot of them are toting around some other guys offspring just makes it even worse.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22562]

Keymaster wrote:

When it comes to breeding, women are not hypergamous. They will breed with any criminal, violent, low-life, drug dealer, thug who treats them like crap. Multiple times.

If “status” were a deciding factor for women to spread their legs, there would be better mating decisions being made. Hypergamy is when she’s looking for the best (and dumbest) idiot she can extract resources from to support her bastard spawn.

I know. The women want it both ways.

People say that genetics play a role in society. Then, the people only claim that men genes should be questioned. Not women’s genes. I believe this is ass backwards. Considering that a woman is more important to the genetics of future generations. Not just from genes, but from the fact that what a woman puts in her body during the nine months it takes to grown a life inside her determines the health of that baby.

And Keymaster. You are so correct. I look at the people women date. They prefer the criminals that cannot stay out of jail over the stable guys with the brains, good health, and overall sane personalities.

And the women are not even picking the smart criminals.

The women are f~~~ing the dumb criminals.

The type of criminals that get caught shoplifting the candy bar as the gas station. We are talking about the shortsighted criminals that think making a quick buck is robbing the nearby liquor store.

We are talking about a level of stupidity by these dumb criminals, that sane men avoid these dumb criminals, because they know these dumb criminals stupid actions tend to not only the dumb criminals in trouble, but those around the dumb criminals in question.

Meanwhile the intelligent criminals are the white collar workers that rob millions of individual savings accounts from people and these intelligent criminals have enough political influence to get away with it.

At least, if the women were f~~~ing the intelligent criminals. I could give respect these women for having some standards and some taste.

Yet. The same women want the stable guys to pay for their illegitimate children. Forget this. We MGTOW are the stable guys. We are the responsible ones. And society continues to screw us over. And so, we MGTOW are doing the only responsible thing we can. We are walking away.

We are not the problem. Society is. And if you, that are the part of society that continues to spurn us, do not get your act together, there will soon not be a society left.

[Author]

Posts