How the Jian Ghomeshi trial has ‘changed forever’ the conversation about sexual

Topic by Enjoy The Decline

Enjoy The Decline

Home Forums MGTOW Central How the Jian Ghomeshi trial has ‘changed forever’ the conversation about sexual

This topic contains 9 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Burgundy  Burgundy 3 years, 12 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #191390
    +6
    Enjoy The Decline
    Enjoy The Decline
    Participant
    1719

    Link

    I have been seeing this trial against a man named Jian Ghomeshi who was accused of sexual assault by what I think was like three females. Now they are saying that they have evidence that those women who are making claims against this guy is a lie due to the inconsistencies the stories that the women said were and how irrational their arguments were also. They even had proof that even after he supposedly sexually assaulted one of them, she still ended up going on dates with him. This guy by the way is a very handsome man, and it looks like these girls want to emasculate him because of their own motives. One thing that the article said gives you an idea of what this is all about though:

    “Currently in Canada’s adversarial court system, the right of every accused person to a fair trial means the vast majority of sex assault cases come down to what Dalhousie University law professor Elaine Craig calls “contests of credibility.””

    ““I believe that Canadians will demand change to the legal processing of women’s sexual assault reports in the wake of this trial,” she said.”

    Looks like Canada might have a change for the better because of the rude awakening realities of this trial. Just in time for MGTOW anniversary tomorrow to show how much we have progressed as men in terms of awareness.

    "Question everything" - Albert Einstein

    #191395
    +3
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    BlacqueJacqueShellacque
    Participant
    6890

    Thank you for posting. A concerned Canuck.

    #191400
    +4
    Grumpy
    Grumpy
    Participant

    Wait for it.
    This should have ended on Feb 12th in court. However it will continue to play out in the court of pubic opinion until the Judge renders his/her legal decision March 24th.
    He should have walked away as not guilty. Based on evidence and common sense.
    The harpies (Femininazis, politicians, and other SJW’s) will continue until they get the verdict they DEMAND. Not what is just

    There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

    #191412
    +4
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    I predict he will be found not guilty.

    I predict that the the feminist government will pass a law requiring all female sex assault testimony be accepted at face value or limit cross examination.

    Why ? Because females don’t make false rape accusations or lie. Ever.

    The truly sad thing about this sham is that real women who are actually raped are less likely to get justice. That is the true crime.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #191431
    +4
    Grumpy
    Grumpy
    Participant

    The truly sad thing about this sham is that real women who are actually raped are less likely to get justice. That is the true crime.

    That there, is the heart rending truth.
    A woman falsely accuses rape, taking resources from a real rape victim.

    Ladies,
    Who is the real misogynist?

    There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

    #191472
    +3

    Hopefully it all works out well for the guy. Funny. Now that they find a perfect 10, their ideal man that they’re all looking for, what do they do? Accuse him of sexual assault. There truly is no pleasing these harpies. The lunacy never ends.

    Like I said, best of luck to this fella.

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

    #191499
    +3
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35862

    ““I believe that Canadians will demand change to the legal processing of women’s sexual assault reports in the wake of this trial,” she said.”

    Looks like Canada might have a change for the better because of the rude awakening realities of this trial.

    I don’t know about that. Nothing about that statement of hers says anything to me about a change for the better. Instead I think she means it needs to change to a more “believe the women not the facts” paradigm. Because right now too many innocent men are going unpunished.

    #191696
    Enjoy The Decline
    Enjoy The Decline
    Participant
    1719

    ““I believe that Canadians will demand change to the legal processing of women’s sexual assault reports in the wake of this trial,” she said.”

    Looks like Canada might have a change for the better because of the rude awakening realities of this trial.

    I don’t know about that. Nothing about that statement of hers says anything to me about a change for the better. Instead I think she means it needs to change to a more “believe the women not the facts” paradigm. Because right now too many innocent men are going unpunished.

    When the article in a major Canadian news site has the title “How the Jian Ghomeshi trial has ‘changed forever’ the conversation about sexual assault in Canada”, I think that in Canada at least will have more awareness on this issue from this point on.

    "Question everything" - Albert Einstein

    #191699
    Enjoy The Decline
    Enjoy The Decline
    Participant
    1719

    And sidecar, towards the end of my post I put this:

    “Looks like Canada might have a change for the better because of the rude awakening realities of this trial. Just in time for MGTOW anniversary tomorrow to show how much we have progressed as men in terms of awareness.”

    What you just did was left out words like the words “awareness” when you quoted it just to make a point when your point is misleading. I clearly said progressed in terms of awareness and you cut the word “awareness” out of the quote and said your point that had nothing to do with what I originally said. You make some good points in this site in general throughout your time in you posting here, but I think that today you are really derailing the message of this topic with your butchery. Please, stay with the message.

    edit: I just want to point out that just because you left out the last sentence in your quoting, it sort of changed the message of what I wanted to say.

    "Question everything" - Albert Einstein

    #191717
    Burgundy
    Burgundy
    Participant
    1525

    We are talking about Canada here, they are more likely to do the same thing they did in Spain, I think it was, where they throw the man in prison, just by the mere accusation, and then after several days in prison, then he can get a lawyer, this insanity won’t get better before it gets worse.

    Even though Jian is a piece of s~~~ Anti-gamergater, he was literally a bluepill mangina cuck, he still needs the fair trial, that any person deserves, but rarely ever gets.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.