How law enforcement turns law-abiding men into sexual predators

[Sam FisherParticipant 206]

This is why you stay the F~~~ away from online dating and sexual personal sites and all that bulls~~~. It’s a minefield.

If any guys on here are using that s~~~, I implore you to reconsider your methods of hooking up. Don’t do it – it ain’t worth the risk.

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

It makes me reconsider even communicating with women outside of when I really “have to” in the first place (i.e., when a woman is my cashier/waitress/etc.).  No more personal conversations with them…at least for me.  I just ignore them.  I don’t want to get suckered into another pretty girl batting her eyes at me when she speaks to me and acts interested in every little thing I say.  Granted, she MIGHT be interested in what I say, but like I said before, that would mentally tell me she falls under the “pre-wall” status, thus she is too young.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

This is the day I now have solid proof that the thought police are now here and arresting men for thought crimes.

But not if it’s “kill all white men”

[RoyDalParticipant]

@keymaster,

Doing a feature on this is a very good idea. It would be enough to consolidate selected posts on this thread.

Meanwhile, I’m doing my part by staying off social media in all its forms. (This site doesn’t count.)

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[JasonParticipant 282]

In theory, I would consider myself a “level 1” MGHOW, however in practice (due to circumstances more than choice) I would probably call myself a level 3. Looking at the linked articles and videos makes me seriously consider going all-out ghost…and I don’t even live in the U.S.; I live in Sweden. We have ridiculous laws and taboos and sociopolitical shaming when it comes to so-called “gender equality” and feminism, but at the very least we have a low age of consent. In fact one of the lowest in the world at age 15- No, scratch that; I just checked an international list, and Jemen goes all the way down to age 9, though restricted to married couples. Yikes.

Er, anyway… I agree that making a feature on this topic makes for a good idea. As for social media, I only ever really used Facebook, and I stopped doing that when they changed their policies earlier this year. For those who haven’t already jumped that particular boat, I can only say what others have said again and again: get the f~~~ out while you still can!

There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

[TheBardParticipant 974]

I have never been into younger women because to me it is too weird. I have always liked women within my own age range, but I work at a high school and can see why some men give in and have relations with the students. I have a student who likes me and while I would never do anything with her, I can see why a weaker man would. I am 27 and women my own age aren’t interested in me, even women in their 30’s aren’t. I still live at home, I don’t make enough money with my current job to live in my own, I have an average car, and I happen to buy a lot of video games and comics since I have the money. Now to a 15 year old girl I am awesome. I have a job, a car, and money to spend on whatever I want. Plus I have traveled and taught over seas not to mention I have graduated college so I know more then a high school boy would so naturally to her I am very interesting. One time when I mentioned I had bad luck with women and as walked away she was like “too bad I’m not your age”. A weak man would totally want to give in to that because she would make him feel special, but it isn’t worth it. Not only is it wrong and illegal but given the age difference it would be so weird. Now it isn’t like she has ever touched me or strongly came on to me at all. She has a boyfriend and to me it is nothing more then a school girl crush which she will get over. She does trust me though since we are only 12 years apart and I went to school in the same district so a lot of what the students do now I also did.

I know there is the explanation of if she is able to get pregnant then there isn’t anything technically wrong with being attracted to an underage girl, which may have made more sense hundreds of years ago, but in today’s society it doesn’t work. 400 years ago you didn’t have a high school life, hang out with friends, and then go to college and enjoy your independence. Once you were old enough you got married, had babies, and did whatever job you could lol.

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

The Police have no morals because they are bought and paid for and in regards to putting inocent men in jail for crap like this,they just do it to look good to the feminazis because they are manginas who want sex and will do anything to get it. I heard a story from someone on this site who claimed he was raped by a woman who used the Police to threaten him. I think the topic was called “Was I Raped” ,but I dont know for sure. If a guy got raped the Police wouldnt care. The undercover cop lady in this topic could have been charged with SEXUAL HARASSMENT.

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

By the way Keymaster now that my only way to hook with a woman for casual sex is banned, how do you think I should go about doing it? Im just looking for advice here:)

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Wouldn’t dream of banning any guy from hooking up. That would be silly. Women are much too horny to try and stop that.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1093011/Women-far-promiscuous-men-says-shock-new-study.html

Since women are more promiscuous than you, you won’t have any problem finding women who are up for a shag. So knock yourself out.

It’s in your best interest to not communicate with them online. You don’t even KNOW that they are female, online. That’s what this article is about. There is never any need to try and meet women to hook with online. 51% of the western population are women. That means even if you DO NOT want to meet a woman, you are MORE LIKELY to meet a woman. They are everywhere — like trashcans are everywhere.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

Would the “no online” rule apply to Tinder or dating sites? Tinder, you can check ages of profiles. If it says eighteen, is there any earthly, reasonable suspicion a man should have that she’s not eighteen? Surely a judge and disinterested jury would think not.

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

Rockmaninoff wrote:

If it says eighteen, is there any earthly, reasonable suspicion a man should have that she’s not eighteen? Surely a judge and disinterested jury would think not.

Oh, it wouldn’t matter anyway.  If she lies about her age, he’s still in trouble and will still forever be branded a rapist by society.

 

[EekParticipant 1162]

So as we reverse engineer the feminist playbook it looks like this:

Trick sucker males into marriage, suck them for all you can, then divorce take half of whatever is left plus child support.

If they don’t fall for the marriage trap, trick them into spending resources defending themselves from fake sexual misconduct.

What is next when that stops working? Someone mentioned an article where a university wasn’t getting as many rape claims as they expected. Once they tap the well dry they will try something else.

[RennieParticipant]

In Spain the age of consent is 14. When I was younger I had a major aversion to any girls younger than me by one year or older, but that faded away in time as the girls my own age became completely uninteresting.

Trying to meet any girls online is just a bad idea because you don’t know who you’re talking to. In the days of MSN that was a frequent problem, you’d get people on other people’s accounts pretending to be them and prying, or just trying to mess things up, or what  you thought was a private conversation turned out to be a group conversation with atleast one other person on the other end and who knows how many else.

The fact is they are at their prime somewhere between 14-20 and beyond that it’s downhill fast. What guy can honestly say they wouldn’t want them in their best years?

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

When I first met my ex wife she was turning 16 and I was 24, so I dodged a big bullet right there. She was already a full blown slut by then, so I managed to try to save a hoe. It lasted 9 years and I got a daughter out of it, but as we all know now, once a hoe is always a hoe, so she went off the deep end. My other ltr before her was a 17 yo virgin, but it still didn’t work out – she had to ride a carousel

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

I do end up telling some people that there are different ages of consent by country, then I get the whole “THIS IS AMERICA!  FOLLOW THEIR LAWS YOU RAPE APOLOGIST”-esque comments from women.  Weren’t people in their teens getting married off in the middle ages, too?

Men are getting sent to jail for merely dating a younger woman.  Back in the older days, this would have been called “courting.”  Now it’s called “grooming.”  Women that do the same to men (or to each other) are either given mere slaps on the wrist in comparison, or they’re ignored and allowed to continue on in life.  Makes you wonder who the “age of consent” laws were meant to target.

[RennieParticipant]

Governor Megachris% wrote:

I do end up telling some people that there are different ages of consent by country, then I get the whole “THIS IS AMERICA! FOLLOW THEIR LAWS YOU RAPE APOLOGIST”-esque comments from women. Weren’t people in their teens getting married off in the middle ages, too? Men are getting sent to jail for merely dating a younger woman. Back in the older days, this would have been called “courting.” Now it’s called “grooming.” Women that do the same to men (or to each other) are either given mere slaps on the wrist in comparison, or they’re ignored and allowed to continue on in life. Makes you wonder who the “age of consent” laws were meant to target.

I wouldn’t even bother discussing this subject with women, their jealousy of those younger women will cause them to react hatefully to anything less than agreement. Most of the vitrol spewed against those caught is from women.

It wasn’t that long ago in history (150-200 years) that marrying young was perfectly normal. But this society got prudish.

[Anonymous 11]

This is what happens after they decimated the anti-entrapment laws so many years ago. Just how a having an online 47 year old obese and hirsute LEO faking being a 16 year old girl and tricking some dumbass who thinks with the little head is a crime has always been beyond me. I’m just glad that wave of reality TV shows showing the heroes busting these idiots seems to be gone. Real pedophiles would be drawn and quartered if I ran things.

Online pussy hunting can be hazardous in so many ways.

[JasonParticipant 282]

A quick check on Wikipedia reveals that, in the 1880s, most U.S. states had an age of consent somewhere between ages 10-12, with Delaware having an age of consent of 7 in 1895. In the early 1900s, female reformers in the U.S. started a campaign (interestingly aimed only at “policing and protecting” adolescent girls, not boys) to raise the age of consent to 16, or ideally 18. By 1920, most states had raised the age of consent to somewhere around 16-18, where it largely remains today. Interesting…

There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

[RennieParticipant]

Jason wrote:

A quick check on Wikipedia reveals that, in the 1880s, most U.S. states had an age of consent somewhere between ages 10-12, with Delaware having an age of consent of 7 in 1895. In the early 1900s, female reformers in the U.S. started a campaign (interestingly aimed only at “policing and protecting” adolescent girls, not boys) to raise the age of consent to 16, or ideally 18. By 1920, most states had raised the age of consent to somewhere around 16-18, where it largely remains today. Interesting…

I’d be content with it being 14 and no lower. I’m not sure what the purpose of it ever being 12 and below was?

[Anonymous 11]

Good find Jason. It correlates with the destruction of the right of a woman to openly sell access to her c~~~ on the free market. Age of consent laws and making prostitution illegal were two prongs of a strategy brilliantly executed by the founders of gynocracy. So prior to “reform”, if it bled it bred. Seven is just a little bit creepy though. God help any poor 19 year old guy getting hit with statutory rape for screwing a 17 year old.

If they really cared about protecting 10 year girls from being exploited, then why do they promote blatant promiscuity to young girls via the mass media?

[Author]

Posts