How come women can never think of an original ideology? (long ass post)

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

We know that the majority of women are socialists who keep voting the socialists who keep voting the socialists into power. But how come women never think of an ideology for themselves and establish one based on past works by men?

For example prohibition was created by christian pastors in the late 1800’s the pastors where against booze do to the fact of it being a sin in the bible. When they started going against it they employed the benefits it would have to women (such as more money for her to spend, and no drunk husband). They spread the benefits women would get from banning booze and soon it grew into a movement. By the year 1919 booze was banned and in 1933 the 21th amendment was introduced to repeal the 18th one which banned it. With pastor billy sunday (the main crusader against booze) live to see his utopia fail.
http://www.biblebelievers.com/billy_sunday_booze.html

Another ideology that women clang onto but did not create was socialism. Socialism was created by karl mark and made popular by lenin. This ideology was one of the most commonly adapted by women. To sum it up its a collective state that cares for all of its citizens using taxes. It is more focused on the health of the society then the health of the individual (a womans dream). The society works on paper as kind and fair but never works in the real world.

And for the final ideology ill mention traditionalism. Traditionalism is more of a theocracy then a free state. The goal of this society is to get all of the population to marry, have kids, and pay taxes. They do this by giving the illusion of the dream life which revolves around having having a family. To make sure the population does it they shame the men into marriage by going after the single guy and pressuring him to marry. And if he does not marry right away tell him he is going to hell for not doing his responsible to god (no silly not live in the desert which is better then a wife, no marry instead). If the whole hell threat does not work then simply make the man an outcast. Women benefit from this society because they are almost guaranteed a husband who will provide for them and they have a safety net of religion so if the husband is a jerk then jesus will do with him after the white knights kill him.

These are just a few of the ideology’s women cling onto. Women want a society where they don’t know what they want. Because they can never know what they want. On one hand they want to be dominated by assholes but on the other they want a nice society. The same also works with dating.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

And for the part on the desert it is a bible quote found somewhere in the old testament that tells men its better to live alone in the desert then a nagging wife. But the traditionalists (mostly christian) leave it out.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

anonymousyam wrote:

And for the part on the desert it is a bible quote found somewhere in the old testament that tells men its better to live alone in the desert then a nagging wife. But the traditionalists (mostly christian) leave it out.

http://biblehub.com/proverbs/21-19.htm

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I think you guys are wrong about women and communism.
The reality was that women didn’t want it. But no one really asked. There were some feminism operatives installed, but this was not a grassroots movement by any means. Communism was not a revolt – it was a military coup, it was simply shoved down everyone’s throats – like it or not.

Communism lowered women’s already low standard of living and MADE them work hard. They couldn’t get any good clothes or makeup, and couldn’t monkey branch. Oh they hated everyone with the passion for it.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Females don’t invent or develop because there is risk involved and it goes against group think.

Men are explorer, inventor, risk takers. We can fall on our ass but we will take risks.

Females don’t. They don’t take risks.

I know a female that has her entire life savings in a bank account. Stocks, bonds, etc. Are too risky. (Maybe she’s right but in general that is a terrible retirement plan ).

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[NewgroundsParticipant 558]

I think you can break this all down to basic biology and sexual dimorphism. How can you expect something (in this case women) to be as creative and as intellectual to something they are not equal to and inferior to (in this case men)? I think with their 10% smaller brains on average the lack of being able to create original ideologies is part of that 10% they’re lacking.

|Right Wing Death Squad| Swallowed both Red Pills /pol/MGTOW

[Anonymous 12]

Because anything that was ever good and worthwhile was created by men. Women can only hope to copy that to try and attain the same power that some men had. The problem is the power men had is a natural power, we are stronger, bigger, more useful and smarter.

All women have is the power to push for more laws to make them supreme, they need to manipulate to makes things the way they want to be whereas for men it just is.

I’m not very religious but I would compare it to this theory, for every one thing that God created the Devil tried to make his own version, so when God made the Horse, the Devil made the Ass.

Sums up Feminism perfectly.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Russky wrote:

anonymousyam wrote:

And for the part on the desert it is a bible quote found somewhere in the old testament that tells men its better to live alone in the desert then a nagging wife. But the traditionalists (mostly christian) leave it out.

http://biblehub.com/proverbs/21-19.htm

Holman Christian Standard Bible
Better to live in a wilderness than with a nagging and hot-tempered wife.

Hahahaha i can’t believe the men who translate modern publications of the bible would leave that one in. Especially since this bible was published in 2004.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[RiargsParticipant 320]

You’re talking about The Essenes…

They lived in the wilds of the desert in the 4th Century, in total Monk Mode.

Any woman that dared to go out there would somehow never come back alive, so they quickly gave up trying to “monkey branch” out there with Essenes.

Those were some seriously Wild Men in those days!

"In my many years I have come to the conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two are a law firm and three or more is a Government..." - John Adams

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Riargs wrote:

Those were some seriously Wild Men in those days!

They are still around.

[Honorable_Juice_BoxParticipant 591]

How could women ever invent an ideology? They struggle just to come up with an original idea!

[goodkid43Spectator 550]

As a Catholic, alcohol is not a sin. Plus, Jesus’ first miracle was turning water into STRONG wine. If Jesus is God, and God cannot not sin, then wine/alcohol is good.
But to be fair to the Woman’s movement and Christian pastors who started the prohibition movement, alcoholism was becoming rampant throughout the nation and causing family disintegration. Of course, the remedy was worse than the cure, but when one actually reads the full account of this time period (thank God for the internet and Amazon books), one is much more sympathetic.
Also, these early feminists were strongly anti-abortion in that if a woman can treat her child as property, then men can treat women as property. Strange you do not here of this fact from modern feminists…..

[OldBillParticipant]

anonymousyam wrote:

But how come women never think of an ideology for themselves and establish one based on past works by men?

Really? Ayn Rand? Objectivism? Shall I list some more?

Listen, Anonymousyam, I know you’re not even out of high school yet and have yet to learn or experience much of anything. That means you get a pass on this one. Okay?

My advice: Read and listen more, post and speak less.

As for the rest of you, this mindless women bashing lowers us to the level of feminists. Women, their thinking, and their behavior are nasty enough without us having to make s~~~ up.

There’s enough real s~~~ women do without us dragging our knuckles around and grunting that no woman anywhere at any time has every accomplished anything. That’s wrong and you all know that’s wrong. It also makes us look like f~~~ing retards to those men visiting here and thinking about joining.

Let’s all try to stop caring enough to keep hating them.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[RennieParticipant]

goodkid43 wrote:

As a Catholic, alcohol is not a sin. Plus, Jesus’ first miracle was turning water into STRONG wine. If Jesus is God, and God cannot not sin, then wine/alcohol is good.
But to be fair to the Woman’s movement and Christian pastors who started the prohibition movement, alcoholism was becoming rampant throughout the nation and causing family disintegration. Of course, the remedy was worse than the cure, but when one actually reads the full account of this time period (thank God for the internet and Amazon books), one is much more sympathetic.
Also, these early feminists were strongly anti-abortion in that if a woman can treat her child as property, then men can treat women as property. Strange you do not here of this fact from modern feminists…..

I’ve frequently heard that said but there were no distilleries back then, you’d have to drink alot of that wine to actually get drunk. Alcohol today is alot more concentrated.

Prohibition was about taking away something men liked to indulge in. Also life was still hard back then and some undoubtedly abused alcohol to dull the pain. If you were in their shoes I doubt you could blame them.

Trying to take alcohol and other things away from men was wrong. Giving women the vote was a huge mistake.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Rennie wrote:

goodkid43 wrote:

As a Catholic, alcohol is not a sin. Plus, Jesus’ first miracle was turning water into STRONG wine. If Jesus is God, and God cannot not sin, then wine/alcohol is good.
But to be fair to the Woman’s movement and Christian pastors who started the prohibition movement, alcoholism was becoming rampant throughout the nation and causing family disintegration. Of course, the remedy was worse than the cure, but when one actually reads the full account of this time period (thank God for the internet and Amazon books), one is much more sympathetic.
Also, these early feminists were strongly anti-abortion in that if a woman can treat her child as property, then men can treat women as property. Strange you do not here of this fact from modern feminists…..

I’ve frequently heard that said but there were no distilleries back then, you’d have to drink alot of that wine to actually get drunk. Alcohol today is alot more concentrated.

Prohibition was about taking away something men liked to indulge in. Also life was still hard back then and some undoubtedly abused alcohol to dull the pain. If you were in their shoes I doubt you could blame them.

Trying to take alcohol and other things away from men was wrong. Giving women the vote was a huge mistake.

Wine fermented naturally always gets to around 10% alcohol (20 proof) – regardless of the era it was produced. And yes – you’d catch a good buzz after a glass or two. Also remember that back in the day there was no potable water to speak of and no refrigeration, so in order to drink something that’s safe and won’t give you a terrible diarrhea – you’d have to carry something fermented like wine or beer that had alcohol in it to disinfect it and protect from bacterial contamination. So people out in the field drank wine all day long – with breakfast, lunch and dinner. So there you go, prudes

This whole prohibition – church connection was ludicrous, but yeah, catholics have a hardline view on pretty much anything good. Lutherans and other Protestants, on the other hand, have a more relaxed view on alcohol. Martin Luther (who started the reformation movement) I think had his own brewery and preached gospel every day at a bar with a beer mug in his hand. The church I go to follows the tradition by having an annual bus trip to a local brewery, which is pretty fun (no women around is the bonus part)

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Author]

Posts