Hilarious: woman ruins herself with women-only company

Topic by Rysh

Rysh

Home Forums Work Hilarious: woman ruins herself with women-only company

This topic contains 17 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by Trapper  Trapper 3 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #380181
    +9
    Rysh
    Rysh
    Participant
    134

    TL;DR version: a woman buys into the lie that women are friendly creatures. She invests a lot of private money to set up a company without men. The whole shebang (pun intended) goes south because of women. In the end, the company is bankrupt – and so is she. She learnt the hard way that there is no “sisterhood”. The term in itself just sounds weird compared to brotherhood.

    Enjoy reading!

    Women Only Disaster

    #380186
    +8
    Nerevar
    Nerevar
    Participant
    8040

    Ahhh, I love reading that story whenever it surfaces again and again 😀

    “Women” are pathetic. They even synchronize their periods when they work together, especially when a hot guy works at the same company, because they all want to be fertile if it happens when he chooses a female to breed with. And they say men only focus on sex. Laughing my ass off here.

    "One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

    #380187
    +1

    Anonymous
    43

    lol

    sounds like hell on earth.

    or any school district I want to work in.

    I have a new school assignment in the fall, woman principal, lots of women teachers. can’t wait.

    #380193
    +4
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    Her story is like a prediction of a feminist future. .GIANT failure.

    #380194
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22574

    I believe people mistake “civil” with “friendly”. “Civil” is just being able to tolerate each other without starting a fight. “Friendly” is actually caring about the welfare of other individuals.

    Most people in groups, both men and women, are not friendly. Most groups of people are usually civil when they all have the same unifying goal. When that is not the case, infighting quickly develops and the group collapses.

    #380195
    +3
    TaxGuy
    TaxGuy
    Participant

    I met a woman a few months back that used to work for an angel investor. Their angle was to invest in women’s start up companies. Used to being the operative phrase. Turns out it didn’t go so well.

    Order the good wine

    #380201
    Nerevar
    Nerevar
    Participant
    8040

    I believe people mistake “civil” with “friendly”. “Civil” is just being able to tolerate each other without starting a fight. “Friendly” is actually caring about the welfare of other individuals.

    Most people in groups, both men and women, are not friendly. Most groups of people are usually civil when they all have the same unifying goal. When that is not the case, infighting quickly develops and the group collapses.

    Most men still work out the hierarchy and act accordingly, working towards a unifying goal, and they prosper. Women, on the other hand, can’t accept it if another woman takes charge. They have to run everything past their group until consensus is reached, and they ultimately fail because atleast one bitch isn’t happy with the set course.

    "One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

    #380218
    +3
    Rysh
    Rysh
    Participant
    134

    Most men still work out the hierarchy and act accordingly, working towards a unifying goal, and they prosper.

    That’s how I know it in business. If I think that bulls~~~ is being decided, I will call it out, and I don’t care whether it’s my boss where it comes from.

    However, if my boss still decides that this is the way to go, then I will do my best to get things done his way. It’s good to make things clear in the decision phase, but there’s no point in bitching around past that. I’m paid for getting s~~~ done, not for whining.

    In fact, I like bossy but fair bosses. They are easy to work with because they know what they want. By contrast, I really don’t get along with insecure beta pseudo bosses who don’t assume leadership. Gimme a f~~~ing alpha boss, and I’m fine.

    Btw, I have a nice little trick how I can afford calling a spade for a spade in technical terms without risking derailing that into a status fight. Whenever my boss and me want to pass the same door, I will wait for him even if I arrive slightly earlier. That way, I show respect for the hierarchy itself and get away with purely technical objections.

    Ever seen this from a woman? They are likely to insult the boss by demanding to pass first just because of pussy.

    #380222
    +3
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Have seen this one before. I was going to add to this because I also recently created a website a “start up” run by a woman. It was a “commissioned” work someone else (a man) hired me to do to elevate her brand , because she worked for him and he wanted to make her business look good. He even offered to pay for half of it.

    She has such a blasé attitude about it, it’s staggering.
    It’s HER BUSINESS and she’s all “whatever”.

    Place your bets on whether or not she holds up her end of the bargain. Same kind of story here. More drama than substance. I could go on for a month about the largely female “hive” I worked for a few years ago. 8 guys pulled all the strings and the 32 women paraded around in their clunky heels and backstab each other all day. Nice to hear it from a woman on the inside for a change.

    We hear it less often from them, because they seem to LIVE for this s~~~.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #380332
    +1
    FunInTheSun
    FunInTheSun
    Participant
    8286

    “…if I were to do it again, I’d definitely employ men. In fact, I’d probably employ only men.”

    Ha ha! I love it. This lady discovered the true nature of women and it’s brutal.

    She complained about a male-dominated industry, but those men were kind enough to give her opportunities to have a prosperous career. Perhaps more men were promoted because THEY ACTUALLY DID SOME WORK instead of worrying about trivial s~~~.

    "I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

    #380335
    +3
    Appleguy1997
    Appleguy1997
    Participant
    3

    Your comment is the truth bro. ??

    Men work together and don’t take business interactions personally. They don’t get offended and then gossip about their fellow workers life/family/friends etc)

    Women take everything personally and that is why most leadership roles in businesses are filled by men.

    Women can’t successfully fill a leadership role because they refuse to think logicly and critically. Instead they let their emotions/envy/insecurities cause others to distance themselves from them…because of their behavior/actions…

    You are your #1 priority…because no one knows you better than you do…

    #380338
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    Tried to prove a point and ultimately failed. I love it when that happens.

    #380342
    +1

    Anonymous
    2

    Men can hate one another but can put it aside to complete a task or mission. Then go back to the previous way of dislike. (An extreme point) Women cannot. They will argue who will lead them off a sinking ship and all drown. No one rises above the herd. Myself if a task needs to be done and another is better qualified at it, I will follow thier lead. Females will sabatoge each other to show they are better than the other. Ultimatly another woman will do the same to her. Domino effect. (failed buisness).

    #380403
    +1
    RedDawn
    RedDawn
    Participant
    1391

    As I’ve said previously, women are the more socially strategic (manipulative) sex generally speaking. They strive on drama and that’s why these drama TV shows are all targeted at the female audience.

    Courage is the key to life itself - Morgan Freeman

    #380418
    +1
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    Credit must be given where it is needed. She put her money behind her ideas that is a lot more than most feminsts.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #381137
    Oz-Bloke
    Oz-Bloke
    Participant
    3233

    I note that the Daily Mail were too gutless to enable comments on this article. Too afraid of a feminazi backlash no doubt. Unlike this Femail article on MGTOW where they enabled comments –

    Meet the men who hate women so much that they have vowed NEVER to sleep with them again

    The gynocentric double-standard here is blatantly obvious. Us red-pillers now see the gynocentric propaganda and call out the BS like this for all to see.

    #ManOut

    #381166
    Bigboy83
    bigboy83
    Participant
    11312

    She still wont get it and blame men.

    C~~~s still need to prove to themselves, that women are greater then men. Epic failure.

    Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

    #382102
    Trapper
    Trapper
    Participant
    2912

    If women ruled the world we’d already be fighting world war ten by now.

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.