Hilarious – Giving Money to Women as BDSM

[Cipher HighwindParticipant 1144]

http://www.vice.com/read/i-almost-sucked-a-dick-to-support-my-financial-domination-addiction-456

In fin-dom, “money slaves” happily hand over cash to dominatrixes who ridicule them for being spendthrift idiots. It can also be highly addictive. Some people spend thousands of dollars a week engaging in this form of BDSM.

Some men are so f~~~ed in their head that they get off on giving money to women without receiving any service in return.

If the above is absurd, then surely the other wealth transfers to women for little or no service in return are equally so.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Sit down before you fall down. There is actually a hashtag and a “thing” called “give your money to women”. I s~~~ you not.

http://www.vice.com/read/give-your-money-to-women-its-simple-284

It seems whores have become so lazy they don’t even want to give blowjobs anymore. But for MY money, she’s gonna have to make like a Hoover™ and she’d better suck so good – until my forehead caves in and the sheets go up my ass – before she gets a f~~~ing dime. Pay these lazy whores with a load across the face if you must, and then kick her cat across the lawn on the way out.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Hahaha hilarious! I cant stop laughing!!!!

Keymaster wrote:

d she’d better suck so good – until my forehead caves in and the sheets go up my ass – before she gets a f~~~ing dime.

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I can think of lots of foolish ways to part with my money — such as that Roger Corman DVD I was watching last night.

I could spend it on a sailboat. Sailing combines toil and suffering with great expense, all for the purpose of going nowhere. It still sounds like more fun than sending money off to some taker who I’ll never meet but does nothing for me. Come to think on it, that’s what civil servants are for!

If I were going to give my money to women, then there is a battered women’s shelter which is tax deductible. Better yet, there is a children’s hospital.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[pharmerParticipant 407]

And I thought ballbusting was the strangest s~~~ you could do for ‘pleasure’
It’s the lack of natural selection occurring any more that let idiots like this crawl out of the gene pool. You see back 10,000 years or so it was guys like this who saw a sabertooth tiger and thought- “Damn! plushy furry! I want to fugglesnuck some of that” and was promptly prevented from spreading his seed.

Never fuck a crazy chick.

[Klaus WindamierParticipant 543]

@keymaster

I open the link, and read what’s on it.

1. Give your money to women as a way of balancing out gender-based income inequality ->without working, receive money? and still eat the bulls~~~ of pay gap at these days?
2. The exhausting work of being a tolerant, gentle, nurturing, listening woman in our relationships with men, at all times -> really? how woman abuse man in any possible way? abusing husband? marriage? child court?

There is more ridiculous point, in fact, all of the article is full of bulls~~~, demand, and nagging of woman, typical.

[Anonymous 29]

Tsk . . . . makes you wonder why anyone in their right mind would give away hard earned money to some freeloading obnoxious, lazy, saggy titted creature.

[Anonymous 2]

As someone who has been involved in BDSM for a long time, I recognize these c~~~s for what they truly are: vampires that (ab)use weak-willed idiots while keeping up the pretense of not being a whore.

The service they render is humiliation, which to a great deal of men, is a sexual turn-on. Some men are willing to provide for free in order to recieve humiliation or degradation.

I have stopped delving into the how-and-why of the men and women involved in financial domination. I simply do not wish for individuals with such motivations to become part of, or even enter, my House. The women I regard as greedy, the men as weak, none are worthy to maintain relationships with me or members of my House.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

The service they render is humiliation, …

Why should I pay some broad for humiliation? After all, I have all that at home!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RoyDalParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Tsk . . . . makes you wonder why anyone in their right mind would give away hard earned money to some freeloading obnoxious, lazy, saggy titted creature.

Hey now! That’s my wife you are talking about!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[HitmanParticipant]

i must whole-heartedly agree with the key-master ! and just add that if giving money to women was a turn on, that child support check every two weeks to my ex would provide a HELL of a boner ! ..to do that when there’s NOT a court order is CRAZY !!!

[Anonymous 29]

RoyDal wrote:

Hey now! That’s my wife you are talking about!

In that case, get your mental whip out and shape her into something you want and not what she imagines she is.
No need to be rude, crude or rough, just firm enough so she knows her place.

[Anonymous 2]

@roydal
The existance and persistence of this phenomena are indicators the services rendered are in demand. So “not enough” men get their fix of humiliation at home, I guess. Don’t ask me why. I think it’s weird and wrong.

@DRS_au
Does it need to be a mental whip?

I’ve been a practitioner of BDSM for long enough to see these women for what they are. They are the worst Dominants in existance because they can’t even take care of themselves. Most FinDoms are poor and just plain arrogant bitches. They have zero skills.

[DethklokParticipant 153]

The things people will pay for astonishes me.

I used to have a female friend that was a stripper. She would be paid $200 to wear a man’s shirt for the whole night. Man the things I could get for $200..

[Klaus WindamierParticipant 543]

I’m started to think the man who into this are overdosing their blue pills.

[Anonymous 29]

Anonymous wrote:

@DRS_auDoes it need to be a mental whip?

Well no . . . . you can use a Kransky sausage for all I care, . . . a feather duster in my case.
But considering I used to set firm rules of engagement before relationship was in full swing, I rarely had to resort to any of the above.

[Author]

Posts