Hero or Stupid?

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/12/19/tennessee-high-school-student-dead-after-he-shielded-three-girls-from-random-gunfire/

We don’t need men…until we need men. The man in the story was a hero, however he shouldn’t have wasted his life on women.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

The conservative lean of the Blaze just emphasizes the con in Trad-con. Save the womenz, they have value. He won’t get to use it, but now they’ll get to sully themselves in college and beyond.

I have to admit that in my younger years my desire to fight for and protect those who were unable or less capable was the reason I followed the career path that I did. I wised up, this young man won’t get the chance.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I want to say stupid hero … but you might throw me off the thread ?

He is a poor .. brainwashed … socially conditioned idiot. A lemming that was traind by the femstapo for just this type of job.

He’s served his purpose … and there’s many millions more lining up to take his place.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Males are a disposable resource to the survival of the human race.

What that poor dupe did would actually have made sense 100K years ago. Humanity needed breeding females lots more than it needed potent males. Plenty of the latter to go ’round.

Therefore, it is built into our DNA to preserve and keep nubile females. The males who survive? Well they are the best breeding stock for the race! Let the dead ones genes become extinct.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Not only are men not needed to protect women because they can incubate children but women are killing their incubating babies at huge rates.

Why would a woman have innate value over a man? Certainly not for child bearing purposes.

1,200 abortions performed in Arizona alone in one month!!! Women don’t want children and should no longer be protected on this basis.

And having killing unborn babies is such an important pillar of feminism that questioning access to abortion is called starting a War on Women.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Not only are men not needed to protect women because they can incubate children but women are killing their incubating babies at huge rates.

Why would a woman have innate value over a man? Certainly not for child bearing purposes.

1,200 abortions performed in Arizona alone in one month!!! Women don’t want children and should no longer be protected on this basis.

And having killing unborn babies is such an important pillar of feminism that questioning access to abortion is called starting a War on Women.

Feminists claim about all the men that commit violence toward women… women commit all abortions. 50% of the babies were female. So doesn’t that make women the biggest murders of women???

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Author]

Posts