Here’s what Cambridge students think of their sexual consent classes

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

Just did a search for MGTOW and found something on reddit, which lead to this article:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3828732/Here-s-Cambridge-students-think-sexual-consent-classes-Women-s-officer-posts-picture-hall-freshers-boycott-patronising-talks.html

The angry women’s officer at Clare College later posted pictures of the empty auditorium on social media and lambasting freshers for snubbing the event. She described the move as a ‘huge step backwards’

LMAO!!!

And Keymaster, that empty chair is pictured above.

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[EekParticipant 1162]

So people don’t like the implication that they are rapists waiting to happen? I am SHOCKED!!!

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

It’s about time too. F~~~ these patronising feminist parasites.

Hard STEM science subjects should be brought back to the forefront of education and soft gender politics should go to the back where it belongs.

[Anonymous 42]

I bet Milo would have packed it full! He’s #1 on google search for Milo! F~~~ing guy’s MGTOW’s f~~~~~ hero!

[BoarParticipant]

Now laydeez I need you to look very hard at that picture. Welcome to your future and don’t bother asking where have all the men gone….

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[Anonymous 0]

They are getting what they asked for. If women can be strong and independent, then so can men. And men have way more experience at it. Isn’t that equality? That empty lecture hall is the sound of men roaring. sarcasm

[DwightDavidParticipant 859]

That empty room is a thing of beauty. This needs to happen more and more. I see it as a huge step forward.

[Anonymous 25]

Priceless.

Talk to the chairs ladies.

Good for the male students in not attending

Glad to seek York University is getting pushback from it’s male students after last year.

Schools and Universities need classes to teach women not to make false accusations

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Schools and Universities need classes to teach women not to make false accusations

Or you could put women in jail when the charges are obviously false.

Order the good wine

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Finally a common sense responses to this gynocentric bulls~~~. More proof MGTOW is the proper way to deal with the issue.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

From the article:

They are the university workshops designed to inform new students about sexual consent in an effort to tackle the rising number of assaults on campus.

What “rising number of sexual assaults”?

All I see is a rising number of false accusations.

Meanwhile I see more and more articles from college women and older wondering: “What happened to all the men? Where did they all go?”

How stupid do they have to be that they can’t figure that one out?

She said: ‘In the 2014 Cambridge Speaks Out survey, 77 per cent of respondents had experienced sexual harassment while at Cambridge.

What else would you expect from a population of fluff brained female idiots who have been taught by their feminist elders that saying hello is sexual harassment.

TaxGuy wrote:

Or you could put women in jail when the charges are obviously false.

Obviously they are unclear on what the proper definition of rape is. Putting them in the general population of a maximum security men’s prison for violent offenders should educate them sufficiently on what actually constitutes rape.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

i wouldn’t go either. good for them.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Government run education.

[Anonymous 1]

Those that run these courses are the f~~~ing antichrist.

Glad to see these classes being boycotted here in the UK.

This needs to begin to happen in the U.S.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

They have much better things to do than cuck themselves.

[Anonymous 0]

There are going to be more empty seats and not just in colleges. Men have made society and without men, it can and will fall. Mark my words, its going to get really s~~~ty before it gets better.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

Now that is how you vote with your feet.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Good picture.

Can be used on the next so call MGTOW “Interview” request.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[~BSParticipant 3266]

Skeptisk wrote:

Just did a search for MGTOW and found something on reddit, which lead to this article:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3828732/Here-s-Cambridge-students-think-sexual-consent-classes-Women-s-officer-posts-picture-hall-freshers-boycott-patronising-talks.html

The angry women’s officer at Clare College later posted pictures of the empty auditorium on social media and lambasting freshers for snubbing the event. She described the move as a ‘huge step backwards’

LMAO!!!

And Keymaster, that empty chair is pictured above.

Need to photoshop tuna in front of the lecture hall. lol

"He didn't marry until now, so he won't ever do it. Think about it, why would a man like him ever marry? It's too late to catch him. " ~some cunt

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

Meanwhile here in Australia, on my daily commute I see posters of local universities welcoming feminist author Clementine Ford to speak and spruke her latest book, despite her Tweeting “All men are scum and must die!“. Proof enough for me that our universities have become misandrous cesspools of feminiazi bulls~~~.

Meanwhile, academic Dr David Rindos (formerly) of the University Of Western Australia was treated terribly by the gynocracy when he called for investigations into allegations that a senior FEMALE academic was having inappropriate lesbian relationships with FEMALE students in the Archaeology Department. Rindos was ultimately denied tenure and was dismissed by the University Of Western Australia on June 10, 1993. Unfortunately he died of a heart-attack in 1996, aged just 49, before he could hear the outcome of the Western Australian Senate Inquiry into the matter which found that –

“It is concluded that Dr Rindos did not have adequate and fair opportunities to present his case [for tenure] and has not, in all the circumstances, been afforded common law procedural fairness, due to the University administration’s apparent reliance on material not disclosed to Dr Rindos.”

“The Committee finds that the procedures adopted by the University to review and determine the tenure of Dr Rindos and his subsequent appeals were ad hoc, and overall, did not adhere sufficiently to the common law rules of procedural fairness given that all relevant information was not disclosed to Dr Rindos for his assessment and rebuttal.”

This is the gynocracy at work gentlemen, at a university near you. A man treated terribly and placed under excessive workplace stress despite trying to end the VERY inappropriate sexual behavior that universities and colleges claim to be against.

To quote this account of the Rindos-University Of Western Australia case from the book The Subversion of Australian Universities –

Sandra Bowdler –

“The head of the department, Professor Sandra Bowdler, took study leave, and Rindos was acting head in 1990. During this time postgraduate students told him about serious problems in the department. The most significant allegations were that the head of department entered into sexual relationships with students and that interactions in the department were characterised by favouritism and nastiness. It was alleged that those on the inside track were given advantages over others, whereas those who had fallen out of favour were discriminated against and humiliated verbally. Favouritism was linked to both sexual relationships and positions taken on archaeological issues. In the words of two academics who reviewed the department,

it was alleged that a number of graduate and undergraduate students had had sexual relations with a member of staff and that this had been followed by favoured treatment of some (in terms of grants and jobs) and apparent victimisation of others (including public ridicule and denial of fair opportunity). It was alleged that an environment had been fostered in which cynicism and ridicule were used to promote certain theoretical approaches and denigrate others and that this stultified free academic exchange, damaged academic reputations and integrity and ultimately severely retarded academic growth, particularly of some promising postgraduate students.[4]

These problems predated Rindos’ arrival and indeed had existed from the time the department was formed, according to a retired former member, Associate Professor Sylvia Hallam.

The issue of sexual relations between staff and students is hot enough on its own,[5] but allegations reported by Rindos added an extra dimension: they were all between women. However, Rindos could not easily be accused of homophobia given that he was openly gay.

During 1990, Rindos reported the allegations he had heard to university officials. Additionally, three students complained to the deputy vice-chancellor. This led to an internal review into the Archaeology Department. The review recommended that there be a formally constituted inquiry into the allegations. However, the report of the review was never formally released – though it was widely available – and the allegations were never fully investigated.

After Bowdler returned to Perth, Rindos came under attack from a number of quarters. He was accused of various things, including sexual harassment, plagiarism and “pornography mongering,” though in each case either charges were dropped or no evidence provided. For his own benefit, Rindos was moved to the Geography Department. Then, following the review, the Archaeology Department was abolished and its staff moved to Anthropology, while Rindos was moved out of any department at all. He was given an office in a nearby building.[6]

Rindos’ position was tenurable. The administration delayed the decision and extended his probation.”

By the University of Western Australia never fully investigating the allegations, does this suggest that the university sees LESBIAN tounge-in-vagina sexual misconduct as being less serious than MALE penis-in-vagina or penis in anus sexual misconduct? Does anyone else smell a double-standard here?

So folks, could you imagine the media coverage and man-bashing this would have received if a MALE head of a university department was alleged to have been giving better grades and favoring certain students in exchange for sex? Let’s face it, the Bloke would have been roasted at the stake, but in this case the then female Vice Chancellor UWA Fay Gale and her committee decide to deny the MALE whislte-blower tenure.

Dr David Rindos should have been given tenure, a promotion, pay-rise and made Deputy Vice-Chancellor for having the courage to bring allegations of a collegial sexual misconduct to management’s attention rather than sweep in under the mat of academia. The latter would have been the simpler path to choose, but David’s conscience led him to the morally correct but ultimately more difficult path.

Oh and surprise, surprise, the Wikipedia page of then UWA Vice Chancellor Fay Gale lists her as “a passionate advocate of equal opportunity for women”. Funny that.

#ManOut

[Author]

Posts