'Here come the MGTOW men'

[Anonymous 22]

Found this article and I was surprised that even in Finland they are starting to talk about MGTOW. The author seriously asks ‘is MGTOW a joke or are they just misogynists?’ .. like it has to be one of them. Take a look at the photo they chose for this article.

http://www.menaiset.fi/artikkeli/ajankohtaista/nyt_tulevat_mgtow_miehet_joko_heita_loytyy_sinun_tuttavapiiristasi

Here is the very pretty author by the way:

[AwakenedParticipant 35206]

Anonymous wrote:

Found this article and I was surprised that even in Finland they are starting to talk about MGTOW.

The TRUTH has no land boundaries, can’t be stopped by bodies of water, and transcends all languages.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Notice the language. Telling the truth about females is labeled as hate speech.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 25]

Dear Finnish women,

Don’t call us, we’ll call you. And good luck defending yourself from the epidemic of immigrant rapists like Sweden. You are on your own. Not men’s problems.

And shaming language no longer works. That’s what little children do in the playground. Grow up.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

The only good thing to come out of Finland was ….. me.

Spent 3 weeks there waiting for nothing to happen.

Let the savages have at them.

Oh .. they did have a good skydive team. But they were in Florida.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

I tried to read it, but they misspelled every freaking word! It’s like it’s in another language or something………

But really, it’s just a joke honey. Women aren’t really that s~~~ty to men. I’m sure you don’t know any women who sat around on the couch all day drinking beer and eating bon-bons while the husband was working. And then divorced him and took half of everything. I’m sure you don’t know any women that “accidentally” got pregnant to trap a man. I’m sure you don’t know any women who go looking for the next guy while still dating the guy she’s with. I’m sure you don’t know any women who use sex to get what they want, but still cry about an unfair game.

Oh, and for the record, the two things that turn me on the most are bangs and a bitch-face. Really, that’s not sign #1 and #2 for a crazy bitch. If you really want to turn me on, try dying your hair blue. That will send me over the top.

Order the good wine

[BigDParticipant 3024]

What’s funny about all of this, it’s not like anyone can just point at one of us and say, “That’s one, that’s one of them MGTOW fellows.” That’s probably what makes them talk crap about us the most. No one knows who we are. We are just some dude at work that isn’t married yet. That guy that just smiles, nods, and walks away to do what we want. We’re just that guy in the background doing what we do.

I take these hit pieces with such a grain of salt. We are winning guys. They’re talking about us to see if they can flush us out. They want us to get angry and out ourselves. Just crazy.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Dear Finnish women,

Don’t call us, we’ll call you.

Exactly.
Don’t worry, girls.
We’ll marry when we’ll be ready.
We just need a little more time to rediscover ourselves and get in touch with our feminine side, so you’ll be more comfortable when we’ll marry.
We also need time to repay the debts we have.
Wait until I’ll repay the debt, then I’ll call you, okay?

😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

BigD wrote:

What’s funny about all of this, it’s not like anyone can just point at one of us and say, “That’s one, that’s one of them MGTOW fellows.” That’s probably what makes them talk crap about us the most. No one knows who we are. We are just some dude at work that isn’t married yet. That guy that just smiles, nods, and walks away to do what we want. We’re just that guy in the background doing what we do.

I take these hit pieces with such a grain of salt. We are winning guys. They’re talking about us to see if they can flush us out. They want us to get angry and out ourselves. Just crazy.

And there’s even more:

What we have today is the complete opposite: “sexual zoning”. Some mixed-sex environments, like the workplace, schools and campuses, are made completely asexual – sterile, so to speak. No sexualized interactions are permitted to take place. This is demanded by law and expected by society. In such environments, you’re supposed to treat members of the opposite sex strictly as colleagues or professionals, non-sexual beings. (Hot men are allowed to get away with more, of course, but that’s another issue.) Other mixed-sex environments, on the other hand, like nightclubs, are expected to be full-on sexual. Everybody there knows that all interactions entail the future possibility of casual sex. It’s basically a meat market. You’re expected to hit on girls, and girls expect to be hit on by attractive men. Socializing in these environments requires action, engagement. If you want to find a partner, either just for sex or something more, you have to go there, you have to have Game etc.

In other words, avoidance of women in the old days was an anti-social act of disengagement that was frowned upon. Today, avoidance of women merely means that you’re not expending excess energy and time to do certain things. It’s an “action” with few or no social repercussions – you won’t be socially ostracized or something. But technically it’s not an action. You’re basically “avoiding” women by not hitting the clubs on Saturday night. You’re avoiding them through simple inaction. You can have a full-time job, or go to college, have a social circle, have hobbies, buddies etc., basically a normie life, and still “avoid” women.

MGTOW is now socially subsidized and easy to implement: just do nothing! At college, don’t engage in class, or even better, “attend” the lectures on-line. Say no more in class or lab than you must, then leave. Start no convos, you won’t be dragged into any. All of this goes for cubicle workers: in the lunchroom, stare at your phone, or eat at your desk, or if you can, get outside but go alone. No feelings caught, no feelings hurt. Everybody gets nothing, therefore everybody wins.

Eventually you can learn the fine art of disappearance in urban settings: yes you occupy space, but other than someone bumping into you, it is possible to go anywhere without your registering with anyone in the vicinity, not even cops. You can switch it on and off like a light.

One possible corollary to look for: see if the “bros before homes” shaming begins to die down. It should. Because before that you patriamalarkey-preaching Tumblr-inas insisted you wanted that cheesy-bro to go? He’s GONE! Soft MGTOW is the mandated social paradigm, outside of “safe social zones” like public streets, malls, clubs, etc. plus in some workplaces and colleges it’s law. You’re going to complain about men obeying the law?

😀

Sexual Zoning

The only way that c~~~s have to find us out is becoming extremely pesky with questions about our relationship status and even our sexual life.
There’s a new, c~~~s: I have an LGBT association membership card.
I have it as safeguard.
Who knows?
Maybe a day a woman will get fired for harassment of a gay…

😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

No need to understand language, there is this picture of cross-blend between sloth and mangina with smart phone taking a selfie and that really explains everything.

First, why the f~~~ would Mgtow take a selfie ? LOL. That is a domain of hive and their mangina slaves. Second point, slothful display is obviously shaming attempt but what they really fear is that a lot of Mgtow excels in their daily life, have excess of women available, have good careers and influence in society, just ….we…dont….want…you.

Deal with it.

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

That selfie-photo was an attempt to shame men, but so far NFG.

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Anonymous 42]

See ^^^^that^^^^ face?

That’s the face women have when men are having fun and emotionally thriving!

That’s the face of “backfire”, when women think they can run society any way they want while looking down the carburetor verturi with both eyes.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Yes, in her picture she clearly has the look of a woman who realizes she will be the fish who either does not get a bicycle, or doesn’t have near the choice of bicycles that she thought she would. Maybe she already has one but realizes she won’t be able to upgrade like she planned, who knows. But she clearly knows the score.

But of course she wants to be clear that women are not accountable at all in the matter. A simple problem with the men is all there is to the matter.

[Anonymous 22]

The article is in finnish language but the comment section is overwhelmingly pro-MGTOW. There are some very intelligent posts there.

I have always considered finnish men very much blue pill. The younger and older people, both. But I guess there are a lot of people that do not show their MGTOW knowledge in their mannerism in any way.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Do you know guys why nobody did really bother when women said “a woman need a man like a fish need a bicycle” but now that some men are saying “we don’t need women” there’s plenty people going mad?
Because people – including even most feminists – knows that women’s words and women’s actions are very different things BUT men’s words and men’s actions usually coincide…

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Anonymous wrote:

The article is in finnish language but the comment section is overwhelmingly pro-MGTOW. There are some very intelligent posts there.

I expect joins to spike up again – WINNING!

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Yes, in her picture she clearly has the look of a woman who realizes she will be the fish who either does not get a bicycle, or doesn’t have near the choice of bicycles that she thought she would. Maybe she already has one but realizes she won’t be able to upgrade like she planned, who knows. But she clearly knows the score.

But of course she wants to be clear that women are not accountable at all in the matter. A simple problem with the men is all there is to the matter.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Anonymous wrote:

Here is the very pretty author by the way:

She’s only “pretty” next to the artificial poster photo they had to purchase from Shutterstock because MGHOW are against selfie culture. Like this one here….

The truth would “Finnish” her off.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

I agree about the selfie photo, it was just a ridiculous attempt at shaming and painting a biased image in the reader’s head before even reading the clearly biased text.

I will say though, that the writer generally does not get to pick the headline or photos/images and their captions for an article. The publication site does that.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Posted a link to this ^ actual selfie over to them.
Countdown to her meltdown in 3….2…..1

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts