Helping womenin their fight against the pay gap…MGTOW!

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Here’s a tongue in cheek article by Dalrock. Firstly it’s a great read, very funny, secondly I actually agree with everything he says to do.

And I’m doing it…and it’s working perfectly!

Happy New Year guys.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Sorry, here’s the link: https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2015/01/01/how-to-close-the-gender-pay-gap-once-and-for-all/

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[ChromestarParticipant 101]

Must be stupid to help anyone that claims that they’re independant and strong – but want help anyway.

Tell those women that think that they’re not getting paid enough to actually go out and EARN their pay increase.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Men who focus on marriage are creating our gender earnings gap by working too hard and producing too much.

Genius. Let’s count the ways that marriage is sexist:

* Male proposals objectify women through implied trade of valuable metal and gemstone in exchange for exclusive sexual access
* Pressure to “wear white” strips females of their right to be sexually active before marriage
* Practice of father “giving the bride away” to the husband treats females as chattel
* Father’s payment of wedding costs and giving of gifts is akin to dowery payment for assumed responsibility of daughter/wife
* The etymological origin of the word “wife” refers back to an objectifying reference to female sexual organs
* Etymological origin of word “husband” refers to male ownership of the house and assumed status as head of the marital union
* Social pressure to take husbands name (in full or in part) undermines female sense of self
* Marriage incentivizes men to work harder to earn more money thereby increasing the gender pay gap
* Social and legal pressure to accept alimony payments upon divorce denies female right to be financially independent
* Termination of alimony upon re-marriage further implies female is financially dependent upon husband

Did I miss anything?

[tsParticipant 109]

exclusive sexual access

That’s not part of a modern marriage.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Social pressure to take husbands name (in full or in part) undermines female sense of self

That’s rich. But the same woman who refuses to take his name, doesn’t have any problem taking everything ELSE from him. The same woman who think they stand on some moral ground because they don’t want his name, will take his f~~~ing house, retirement plan, kids and life away without a second thought or consideration.

PAY GAP? Women are GROSSLY over paid and we’re going to prove it now.

Tiger Woods wife got 1/4 of a Billion $$ for being bad in bed and beating her husband with a golf club.
There isn’t a man who has collected $5 for that. There is your “wage gap”.

Now consider the countless millions of other ex wives and bad mothers who collect monthly vaginamony and child support payments from men — TO JUST GO AWAY.

95% of all child support is paid out by men (even for children that are not their own) because women can’t (or WON’T) financially support their OWN children. There is NOT ONE Man alive who is collecting 216 monthly payments for 18 years or more from a woman for a child that is not even hers.

Women are GROSSLY over paid.

Men don’t get ever get paid to be good for nothing – or to GET LOST.

Happy New Year HR Puf’nStuf and to all!

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MendokusaiParticipant 256]

I’ve never understood this term,in the Trades you have to be paid the same hourly bargaining wage-just like any hourly job.

So if there is a so called “gap” it must lay in the “white collar” sector where people are paid in salary plus performance bonuses.

Now I can see where this becomes a grey area,you have for example a male exec who out performs in his position and is rewarded with stock bonuses.

Then you get the token female who was hired more because her gender than qualifications crying foul because of this.

You never hear a f~~~ing peep though in industries dominated BY females like fashion and porn/sex  where they make much more than their male counterparts!

[liventhedreamParticipant 42]

There was yet another recent article on Slashdot about not enough women in the tech sector but not days before another report about women that leave the developer arena and go for management or sales roles AFTER being in development. IE, they hate it and want a different job.

I have a theory and here is the context: (And this reigns true of all the women I have ever worked for in tech), they worked the bare minimum of 2 years before getting out. They either get married or move into management (this seems to happen 100% every company I have contracted with).

The ones that make it to management get paid well, but they hate other women. I mean, HATE other women, save a select few. They promote a boys only fan club for themselves of all male employees. Sort of like a female harem.

So my take from this:

1. women dissuade other women from ever climbing the ladder (unless she’s a friend or protégée)….other then that they can get stuffed.

I think its because some women that make it to management ….basically they want to be a man. Pretty much, they want to be part of the boys club and another girl coming in flashing her ass and t~~~ around is going to remind all the other guys that she’s a women too. Its like they want to be so distant from a sexual object they don’t care if they are a detriment to a talented employee. They want to be part of the guys club.

So basically what I’m saying is….women do this s~~~ to themselves. Any pay gap is more do to there own kind or there own actions (throwing in the towel after 2 years in tech….seen lots of that too).

[…Spectator 1165]

If there is a gap-and we can smell it- you will pay.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

women do this s~~~ to themselves

That’s a pretty interesting concept. I think we can all agree that females pretty much hate other females… and the notion that females who have advanced into the managerial ranks resent younger, more aggressive females coming into the system and drawing attention to themselves is truthy.

What do you guys think? Are females actually sabotaging other females in the STEM fields? Does the first female into an organization naturally desire to set herself up as the queen bee, surround herself with mangina drones and destroy any other females who may come along and seek to depose her or draw attention to her flaws?

The few females I’ve personally known who are involved in the technical fields have pretty much done this. I’m thinking specifically of a female who found and bound a programmer daemon to be her “boyfriend” as she set herself up to be his project and social manager… then she brought a number of fabulous gay men into their world to support her emotionally while the boyfriend generated the wealth. All of her orbiters claim that she is a brilliant scientist and hold her up as a model of women in the tech industry but all I can see is her ability to cast a spell on a bunch of weak minded men.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

I get asked a lot by females why I am knot married and why I do not have a child… usually I just shrug the questions off but now I’m thinking to answer that marriage is misogynistic, thus the “reasons” I listed earlier.

I’m also thinking to say “I never sired a child because of the damage it would do to the ecosystem. 4000 disposable diapers, 60,000 gallons of crude oil and 3 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions? And that doesn’t even include any children they might have! No amount of yoga, organic shopping and recycling could allow me to sleep at night knowing I’d done that much damage to the Earth. How many kids do you have?”

Baby’s Carbon Footprint

[…Spectator 1165]

doc: hahahahahahaha!

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

Brilliant, close that alleged pay gap by destroying children,families, men, the economy, and civilization. In other words, stay the course.

That should just about take care of things.

Until the feminists move the goal post again……..

[In Which We ServeParticipant 111]

Docfenderson – comedian Doug Stanhope said much the same as you to a crowd of hipster students at a comedy/rock festival in England. He concluded by saying something like ‘your uterus is the biggest pollutant on this planet’ . He was screamed at and had bottles thrown at him!

Seems to me this gender pay gap is a crock of sheeite. It seems to me a wilful ignorance of facts and instead a willingness by social justice warriors to shout ‘sexism’ without looking any deeper. It’s the same with other things. Eg, in the UK, we have a lot of muslim immigrants from India, Pakistan etc. The liberal media often carries stories about how unemployment rates in those communities is high, and of course concludes it is down to ‘racism’. What they don’t tell you that in most first generation muslim immigrant families, the women don’t go out to work for cultural reasons, so get classed as ‘unemployed’ by the government.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

In Which We Serve: I’ve heard that bit and I love it… Stanhope says a lot of really spot on s~~~ and I’m happy to borrow from him occasionally, although I have to provide citations where he just has to dodge empty beer bottles. One of his best rants, in my opinion, is the one about “raising awareness” where he talks about telling other people to look at tragedy being the calculated least possible thing you can do for someone in need and yet still appear to be doing something.

If I play a favorite Stanhope bit for someone and they don’t like it, I can tell we’re not going to get along. I took a date to his recent gig here at the Palace casino in Las Vegas and she was so displeased (triggered, even) by the end of the set that I didn’t even bother walking her back to her car.

Jack Reacher: Destroying civilization by attempting to strip men of our natural powers through using their own powers against us is EXACTLY what the feminists are doing. My comments and the “modest proposal” argument that inspired them are meant to point this fact out. Females are running amok today like a virus, backed up by mangina pussy beggars, hopeless white knights and big daddy government and they are well on their way to destroying the host upon which they depend for their own sustenance.

Feminists today are like kids in a candy factory stuffing their gobs with every colorful candy treat they can get their hands on while growing fat and rotten as they slowly starve to death from malnutrition. And I will stand on the bank of that chocolate river like the Willy Wonka of MGTOW and whisper “I wouldn’t do that if I were you.” as the current takes them under and they’re slowly and painfully sucked away to be made into fudge… or marshmallows… or whatever.

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

Doc, I understand the satire intended with the modest proposal, I guess my comment could have been worded differently to better to reflect this. That was the reason I added the moving the goal post sentence at the end, because no amount of accommodating any loony feminist complaint will make them happy because their existence is justified with a continuing string of complaints. As things improve for them, the complaints get more and more trivial until gender equality is not even in the conversation.

Once gender equality is removed from the conversation, the truth of feminism will be made clear, such as the killallmen movement. They dont give a s~~~ about anyone besides themselves. I actually encourage the killallmen bitches, because this is feminism stripped of all the bulls~~~ stats, media and government manipulation, and human rights pretenses. Women give a s~~~ about themselves and only themselves, which is exactly how they have encouraged to behave in this gynocentric culture.

They don’t have some bulls~~~ maternal instinct as we have been lead to believe for centuries, as evidenced in their demands for abortion access, declining birth rates, willingness to f~~~ children up in divorces, willingness to abandon children to the care of others so they can work, complaints about post-par tum depression, treatment of young boys in school, greater rates of physical abuse of boys.

They will manipulate sexual assault statistics, stating “1 in 5 women in their lifetime will be a victim of sexual assault”. What this does, is takes the focus away from the women that were sexually abused as children, and puts the focus on the women instead. The child advocates end up with very few funds and government and public interest while the adult bitches get all the attention. These bitches are actually stealing money from sexually abused children because a great percentage of the “in their lifetime” sexual assault occurs before the age of 18. But what is key is, the sexual abuse rates for all children are quite close, so the bitches cant have the focus drawn to that age group because the truth would become known, that both boys and girls are being sexually abused, women do not own that victimization.

They don’t give a s~~~ about men, they are quite willing to continue to let men die and get injured at work, ignore male domestic violence victims, ignore male sexual abuse and assault victims, ignore the overwhelmingly male suicide victims, the list goes on as we know.

They certainly don’t give a s~~~ if the economy can withstand all the affirmative action and quota demands, they don’t give a s~~~ if the military suffers when it lowers requirements in order to get closer to parity for males and females in the armed forces.

I think feminism is the ultimate development of their existence. It demands for them everything and validates their feelings without question. Why the f~~~ wouldn’t women support feminism? Even after the bulls~~~ veil of human rights and equality is ripped away and the narcissistic reality is exposed? It will be MGTOW’s though that will make the costs of this support clear, by refusing to serve for and die for a gynoocentric world, which will turn the tide from the gynocentrism to a phallocentrism.

 

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Yep, that about sums it up. Sorry if I assumed you’d missed the point of my earlier post… once we get to talking in sarcasm and using the other side’s arguments against them, the nuances of understanding can get lost.

But yeah, there’s no doubting that you get it,

[In Which We ServeParticipant 111]

Feminists today are like kids in a candy factory stuffing their gobs with every colorful candy treat they can get their hands on while growing fat and rotten as they slowly starve to death from malnutrition. And I will stand on the bank of that chocolate river like the Willy Wonka of MGTOW and whisper “I wouldn’t do that if I were you.” as the current takes them under and they’re slowly and painfully sucked away to be made into fudge… or marshmallows… or whatever.

Haha this is spot-on and hilarious…can’t stop laughing!

[GoneGaltParticipant 361]

Keymaster: “95% of all child support is paid out by men (even for children that are not their own) because women can’t (or WON’T) financially support their OWN children.”

Can you please post a link to the source backing this up? I’ve seen it several times in the forums and would LOVE to get my hands on the source the next time a female gives me a hassle about marriage. 🙂

[Author]

Posts