Having A Baby Not A Big Priority Anymore

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9558]

I just heard on my local ABC 7 Chicago News just now that having a baby, according to Wallet Hub, is no longer a top 20 priority. Reason being is because it’s too expensive and frustrating. They also state which states are best and worst to have a baby. Here in Illinois, it’s 30th best; Vermont is #1 and Mississippi is 50th.

I can agree with this source, because I don’t want any kid. I want to live and enjoy my time and money and not put it towards some screaming brat who will grow up to hate me and take advantage of me. Who wouldn’t want to live life without the extra expenses and stresses?

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Anonymous 6]

Dude go read my thread i just posted. I touched on this very topic.

Kids are money pits man, your constantly stressed and when they get older and f~~~ up, it’s up the you to get them out of whatever hole they got into. With diapers, formula, clothes, daycare, school, activities, and more, i’m more inclined to believe that statistic that said kids cost an average of $250,000. I could buy some land with that and start building a nice house on it with that. Or I could invest half of it. Kids are very overrated

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

I might be more willing to raise a kid if I knew I could spend time with them. But the modern system is a man spends money and only money on kids while the mom get’s all the joy and fulfillment. I’m expected to bankroll the whole thing while being called a dead beat and they celebrate her for being some f~~~ing hero called a single mom.

It’s not a priority for me either, but the great joy of being a man is that we have all the time in the world. We can have them up until we’re 70 years old, meanwhile women are all dried the f~~~ up. LOL.

Nature’s a bitch, ladies.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22556]

Silverstone the Second wrote:

I might be more willing to raise a kid if I knew I could spend time with them. But the modern system is a man spends money and only money on kids while the mom get’s all the joy and fulfillment. I’m expected to bankroll the whole thing while being called a dead beat and they celebrate her for being some f~~~ing hero called a single mom.

This is exactly why I refuse to father any children. It is a no win situation for men.

Since I am not allowed to be a daddy to any children I father, I am not going to be father to any children.

[TuneoutParticipant]

Come on guys , it’s only the first 40 yrs of being a parent that are the hardest, lol

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Anonymous 3]

I would be willing to father and raise children. However it seems children belong to women and are raised by the State, and I’m not interested in that arrangement.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Not a priority? Really? That’s how they’re trying to spin things?

That’s like saying getting bitten in the b~~~~ by pitbulls is “not a big priority anymore”.

Gynocentric laws have turned children into nothing more than GIANT F~~~ING LIABILITIES for men. It’s not that men are “changing their priorities”. Men are actively avoiding having children. Why do they think the numbers of men getting vasectomies, especially the number of men under thirty getting vasectomies, are skyrocketing?

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Silverstone the Second wrote:

I might be more willing to raise a kid if I knew I could spend time with them. But the modern system is a man spends money and only money on kids while the mom get’s all the joy and fulfillment. I’m expected to bankroll the whole thing while being called a dead beat and they celebrate her for being some f~~~ing hero called a single mom.

Yup…thats why I don’t want kids any more as well. I know way too many guys that pay some ridiculously inflated child support amount and they only get the kids like every other weekend. Wtf is the point…I’d rather just get a dog, its cheaper and I can spend time with it daily.

[Tiga KParticipant 1693]

The idea of having a kid and being able to raise him/her and watch their progress doesn’t sound bad, but as has been stated, the risk are too high. As soon as the little one is born, I face an unacceptably high chance that my time with them will be reduced or completely taken from me. They will grow up hearing dads as the butt of jokes in churches, schools, and television. And gynocentricism aside, they are expensive and they will end up getting their heads messed with by the school system. I remember the anti-drug program coming to my elementary school telling kids to shame their parents for smoking. I don’t smoke, but brainwashing kids against their parents is not cool.

[AnthonyParticipant 2281]

The average cost of raising a kid is $240,000 thousand dollars

Now why in the world would you wanna stick your dick in a used petri-dish to spend $240,000 during the course of 18 years? Not only that, you have to deal with the possibility of paying child support if the mom’s a bitch who doesn’t allow you to see your kids.

So you’re probably looking at paying close to $500,000-$900,000 thousand dollars during the lifetime of 1 f~~~ing kid.

No thanks, dogs are cheaper.

Plus, I’ve never wanted kids. They’re too noisy, loud, and too energetic at the wrong f~~~ing times of the day. They want you to run and play with them at 6am or jump on your bed at midnight. Nope, f~~~ that s~~~. Having a kid is a complete waste of time.

Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

[Anonymous 3]

Most of you are too young to know this, but back before this feminist push for child support, women would leave their husbands with the kids all the time. They wanted nothing to do with their own children. They clearly didn’t care.

As soon as the State tied money to the children, all of a sudden women were all busy pretending they were the better parent and that men could not take care of children.

There was something called a “Dear John” letter, which women would write when leaving their husbands, with or without kids. That stopped with child support and alimony, because women would then just use the State to run their husband through the ringer and steal his resources.

The men that ran society and made up these policies are awful human beings. In case anyone is wondering, the first governor to sign No Fault Divorce laws was Ronald Reagan. People praise the guy, but I’ve always hated him.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

women would leave their husbands with the kids all the time

Yep, that happened a lot where I grew up in the 60’s & 70’s

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[BONEParticipant 448]

F~~~ that piece of s~~~ Ronald Reagan, he was the one who launched that big ass anti-marijuana campaign right? and wasn’t he the one who tried alcohol prohibition? he borderline ran this country into the ground with his stupid ass policies.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

BONE wrote:

F~~~ that piece of s~~~ Ronald Reagan, he was the one who launched that big ass anti-marijuana campaign right? and wasn’t he the one who tried alcohol prohibition? he borderline ran this country into the ground with his stupid ass policies.

Wut?

Ok, first justify how any of that is true, and then justify how it is relevant to this thread.

[Author]

Posts