Hatred of Women

[EdogParticipant 254]

I’m sorry guys, but I’ve seen some rather stupid posts recently that have led me to make my first topic since joining.

I sense there are a quite a few impostors in here who absolutely hate females and claim to be MGTOW, when really, they’re just here because it’s a place they can flame women and get away with it for the most part. For them, it’s not about understanding, but hatred of women.

How many of you hate women? How many of you have the integrity to be honest and simply state your claim? If this is you, then be heard. I want to know who you guys are and what your reasoning is.

You see, for me, MGTOW is something I’ve been doing on my own for the last 15 or so years. What drove me to this? Simple observation of the world around me coupled with my own personal experiences. Because I eventually began to realize the psychology at play and just how deeply rooted it so many time is, I began to break down many barriers of understanding. I actually understand a large portion of the female mind now to the point that I can predict a large portion of activity and as well understand a large portion of the reasoning (or lack thereof).

Now, having said that. Do I hate females? No I don’t. Are they toxic in many ways? Absolutely yes. They can be the worst thing that ever happened to you in many ways. But do I hate them for this? Hell no I don’t “hate” them. I recognize what they are and it’s because of this that there is no reason to hate them. It’s to be expected. Once you begin to understand women, you begin to realize that they can’t really be understood, at least not in any personal manner. We’re left to observe and repeat not unlike the scientific method. And in due time, we can see these creatures are generally the same and not that different from one another.

But I see people on here who rant and rave about feminist plots as if all females on the Earth are man haters and in turn all women should be hated by men. I seriously get this sense from some of the posts I see. No reasoning or any indication of a deeper understanding. Just blind hatred of females because they are angry that they live in a gynocentric society. To me, this reveals a very base and low level of thought process not dissimilar to animals. Do females manipulate men? Yes. Have they always tended to? The answer appears to be yes as far back as written text takes us. So does the nature of females in turn mean they should be hated? Can anyone here justify this hatred, or will you admit you simply don’t understand either claim in any real sense and you’re just emotional?

You see, I joined originally because like so many here, they’ll say that they perused the boards for a week or two, liked what they saw for the most part, and decided they would become another voice to be heard. I joined because I saw a lot of men who had the exact same stories and experiences I did. I saw people I could agree with, at least on some major talking points. I don’t sweat the small stuff among men. Common ground regarding decency is all I ask. Come at me, and I’ll come right back at you. Simple man terms, right?

Now, I’m with most of the guys here. Most of you are great guys. Opinionated and yet respectful. I might not agree with all of your thoughts and ideologies and just the same you won’t always agree with mine, but I can respect the majority of you as individuals even when we disagree. I fully understand that when many of us say things in a thread or make a cheeky comment about females, there is a common ground. The majority aren’t speaking from hatred. We’re speaking from experience. We know what women really are and we express it in many ways around here. I myself have given examples of just how wretched the female mind can be and what filthy creatures they are capable of being and made sure to drive the point home. In many ways this is all encompassing as well. It should be the standard default position if it weren’t for all the lies we were told growing up. But does this in any way warrant or justify any kind of hatred? Bitterness, yes. Anger, yes. Sorrow, yes. Bewilderment, yes. But hatred? Nope. Not for me. I don’t see any reason why I should “hate” a person at all for anything. People don’t do horrendous things because they are well. They do horrendous acts because they are not well. This is like seeing a crowd of people gathered around whooping and hollering, cheering and laughing. You come over to see what’s going on only to find that it’s the town lunatic who is doing his usual crazy antics, dancing around naked and eating his own feces. Now…who are the sick ones here? Is the lunatic the sick one, or is it the crowd? The lunatic doesn’t know he’s sick. He’s innocent in this regard. It’s called insanity. He may be guilty of some sick s~~~, but he doesn’t truly know who he is or what he’s doing anyway, so how is he accountable? But the crowd, who instead of realizing that this is a sick man and should all expect him to do these sick acts, stops to mock, ridicule, and make sport of the local crazy man. So who is really sick here? The crazy man who didn’t even know he was sick, or the crowd who knew full well what they were doing by making sport of a crazy man and did it anyway?

Should females be criticized? Hell yes. I’ve already got a handful of posts floating around here where I have made it clear that females should really never be trusted and that they only run on emotion and ego. I’ll continue to post them because it’s very solid and proven ground to stand on.

But I see people posting s~~~ on here like “I wouldn’t p~~~ on a woman if she were on fire”, or posting hypothetical scenarios where others join in only to tell us all about just how miserable for the females they would make it, and how they’d love to flip the tables and control the female for once. I see people advocating that women should be slaves and aren’t worthy of being treated as anything but property. Basically, I see what I would consider to be some very deluded and hateful souls who come here to post their hatred. And some of them think it’s funny as they type it.

How many of you would save a female from a life or death scenario knowing ahead of time it may well cost you your life? I would. Because for me, yeah, she’s a female and she represents a great many things I despise, however she’s also a human being. And I think that’s something some of the guys lurking in this place either don’t see or lost somewhere along the way. Undoubtedly as I ask that question, some of you are already thinking the above that you wouldn’t p~~~ on her if she were on fire. But my question is why? Why would some of you watch another person suffer and do nothing to help even when you could? And this isn’t a judgment issue either. If you’re answer is that you wouldn’t save her and can give me a decent and reasonable personal answer as to why, then fine with me. Do what you want to do. But if you can’t give me some kind…any kind of justification aside from hatred, then I’d say maybe you need to consider just what your own life is worth just the same. Because the difference between some of you and me is that knowing ahead of time that you wouldn’t save me, I’d still save you just the same. And that’s because I love my fellow man and my fellow woman. I don’t hate them. They are not perfect, and neither am I. I am not greater than they are, and they are not greater than me. Our lives are worth equal amount in terms of humanity, and that’s something I suspect a handful of guys here don’t have when I observe their posts.

Can you guys see where I’m going with this? How many of you can distinguish the difference between a female and a human and exercise the proper time and context to make the distinction? There is a time and place when a female ceases to be a female and becomes a human being. Her life DOES have value. If her life holds no value, then yours holds none either. How many of you would single out women and seek intentionally not to aid them specifically because they are females?

How many of you hate women? How many will seek to justify hatred?

[Anonymous 12]

I don’t hate women at all, I think for the most part they are also victims of the Feminist/Social Revolutions of the 50’s and 60’s and now we are all paying the price for the destruction that it has caused.

I would say that overall I have a lot more respect for women then women themselves do and especially the Magina’s and White Knights that support them.

I think at times it does get a little “Ho hum” on here when posts and threads become a mirror image of the Feminazi stuff that blames men for all the ills of the world. I would like to think we are and can do better than that.

I can also sympathize with men who have been through divorces, custody hearings and lost it all and this forum is a safe place for them to vent their feelings.

We just need to express ourselves intelligently even if we are p~~~ed off/hurt.

 

 

[KeymasterKeymaster]

@edog

This has been covered extensively here already, and the accusation of “misogyny” has been ripped apart, deconstucted and thrown away here too many times already. In fact, we don’t even PERMIT members to PRETEND they “hate women” because it’s impossible, silly and unrealistic to “hate woman” as an entire sex – just like it’s impossible to love them all.

/forums/topic/why-i-hate-women-and-why-you-should-too/

That thread (and member) was thrown in to the litter box forum immediately – exactly where it belongs.

In fact… I said it again just yesterday to someone who was publishing a piece on MGTOW:
/forums/topic/mgtow-defined-politically-correct-version/

We’re not going to sit here and explain “we don’t hate women” to every goddam feminist and person who slings the accusation, because there isn’t basis for the accusation in the first place. “You hate women” is a stupid statement. It’s like talking you “you hate pizza”…. or “you suck dicks”. It comes from the intellectually stunted. They are not even remotely closely to accurate.

You will never see a MGHOW knock the Starbucks out of a woman’s hand. No MGHOW ever set a woman’s hair or belongings on fire. You will never see a MGHOW start yelling at a woman on the street or causing her physical harm. No MGHOW has ever spit on a female he passed on the street, keyed up her car or even start yelling obscenities at her. That would be called “hating women”.

You know why you’ve never seen it???
Because MGTOW treat women far better than they deserve.

Even a MGTOW who has experienced the ultimate worst scenario and had his own children, house and wealth permanently taken away from him and his very freedom and reputation ruined and stolen >>> treats that woman better than she deserves. Nobody gets to say “MGTOW hate women”. There isn’t a single MGTOW who has done ANY of the above s~~~. Never mind MOST of them.

NOT.

ONE.

You will never see a MGHOW stick his finger down a woman’s throat to get her to lose weight. But countless women do that to themselves. In fact, if you’re gonna to insist on using the word “hatred”… it can be far too easily proven that MGTOW is a direct response to the degree that women hate men. Oh yeah. I said that s~~~. Don’t make me bring it out. There isn’t a SINGLE MGTOW – NOT ONE – who has tweeted “short women should suicide themselves”.

But guess what: https://twitter.com/heightismxposed

Need another? Feast your eyes on this:
http://mgtow.com/images/misc/heightism/1.jpg

There are another 25 pages where that came from. No MGTOW has ever even TWEETED s~~~ like that. EVER. And so a man comes here, points out the reality, and expresses his displeasure towards the existence of that kind of GARBAGE that is perpetuated in our culture…. and he is now expected to explain away the accusation of “misogyny”??

Not happening.

---

APPENDED EDIT:

You know what Thomas Ball did? He was FULLY justified in “hating” his ex wife. And after being dragged through hell, not even he set his ex wife on fire on the courthouse steps. He set HIMSELF on fire… when he definitely shouldn’t have. Not even Thomas Ball “hated women”. He hated HIMSELF for listening to all that bulls~~~ about what kind of “angels” women are, and for listening to his wife’s wedding vows.

If I were there when he did that s~~~, I would have definitely p~~~ed on him if it would have saved his life and allowed him to have a normal one again. I would NOT have p~~~ed on his ex wife or her divorce attorney. That’s for sure. You see why that statement works now???

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[EntropyParticipant 902]

I think it’s easy to say shocking things on the internet, and I see this as a place for any man to speak, and be heard- unlike mostly anywhere else on earth.

The injustices the men here suffer are appalling, and I typically take the extreme statements with a grain of salt. I keep in mind that for some men here, each new day IS the worst day of his life, because of some woman.

Speaking truthfully, I feel HATRED toward a lot of things (usually only when I’m really hungry or in traffic)… but then I come to my senses a moment later and carry on. I have to think I’m not alone in that… give me two beers and a phone call from my ex and I could easily be one of the guys you are talking about.

Fortunately, this forum does a great job of weeding out the real crazies trying to stir up s~~~, and (respectfully) I would rather it be a place where people can say that they wouldn’t p~~~ on a burning woman, than a place where people complain about the fact that someone SAID they wouldn’t p~~~ on a burning woman…

"Compare your lives to mine and then kill yourselves" -BBR

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Looks like it’s time to bring out the bear trap again.

Here is a rusty old bear trap:

Do you HATE the rusty old bear trap?

Is it HATEFUL to call it what it is: a rusty old bear trap?

Are you going to stick your penis in the rusty old bear trap?

Is it HATEFUL to refuse to stick your penis in the rusty old bear trap?

Women often try to conflate male honesty with hatred because it’s so much easier to accuse a man of hatred than to admit the truth and correct their own flaws. Don’t make that mistake.

Edog wrote:

But I see people posting s~~~ on here like “I wouldn’t p~~~ on a woman if she were on fire”

I think you’ve missed the point of that idiom. It is not a statement of hatred. It’s the ultimate expression of indifference. Learn the difference. It’s important.

At no point does that expression imply the person saying it set the woman on fire, or wants to set a woman on fire.

Women often try to conflate a refusal to assist them with hatred because it’s so much easier to accuse a man of hatred than to admit their own problems and solve them themselves. Don’t make that mistake.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

@sidecar. I could only aspire to saying it so perfectly in fewer sentences as you just did. +10, hombre. Let’s make it +100 . I’m buying.

sidecar wrote:

I think you’ve missed the point of that idiom. It is not a statement of hatred. It’s the ultimate expression of indifference. Learn the difference. It’s important.

Exactly right.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 1]

Edog wrote:

People don’t do horrendous things because they are well. They do horrendous acts because they are not well. This is like seeing a crowd of people gathered around whooping and hollering, cheering and laughing. You come over to see what’s going on only to find that it’s the town lunatic who is doing his usual crazy antics, dancing around naked and eating his own feces.

So, you are saying that women do what they do because they can’t avoid it? Are you saying that the mere fact of being a woman, is a condition that absolve them from responsabilities of their actions, the same way the lunacy of a men’s actions would ablsove him from his antics? I call it bulls~~~. Although I recongnize that is from woman’s nature to try to get resources from a men using their lure, I would also expect them to be beyond that, the same way we expect men to be beyond their primal insticts to solve disputes with violence! This is the type of biological determinism that I am against. Evolution didn’t stop at “men working, woman at the kitchen” phase, we are still evolving. And if men can bypass his primal instincts of tearing each other apart and build civilization, to the point we aquire NEW set of parameters as basic insticts, than you can bet your ass that I will expect the same from woman, if you expect me to think of them as the same species.

Edog wrote:

But I see people posting s~~~ on here like “I wouldn’t p~~~ on a woman if she were on fire”, or posting hypothetical scenarios where others join in only to tell us all about just how miserable for the females they would make it, and how they’d love to flip the tables and control the female for once. I see people advocating that women should be slaves and aren’t worthy of being treated as anything but property. Basically, I see what I would consider to be some very deluded and hateful souls who come here to post their hatred. And some of them think it’s funny as they type it.

Sooo, you are putting 2 types of people on the same basket. I would not p~~~ on a woman, if she were on fire. And I mean that. Do this means that I would purposely make female miserable? or that I would like to treat them as slaves or property? No. And not because of compassion, or anything like that, but because doing that would imply putting their responsabilities on men’s shoulder, and I am sick and tired for men to be called on taking women’s share. That bring us back to not p~~~ing on a woman if she was on fire. Did I set her on fire? No, then why would I help her getting out of a situation that she put herself into? And the reason for that is pretty simple: would she help ME, if I was in fire? If you look around you, you would have your answer. Not only a woman would not help you if you were in fire, some of them would throw gasoline at you. So call me hatefull then, because acting the way I would, it would still be treating them better then the way they would treat me, if the roles were reversed.

As for the posts of treating men as slaves and/or property, or all that violent s~~~ against them, they were dealt with properly by memebers of this forum and than deleted, and were probably posted by trolls. There will always be posts like that, and in a sense is a good thing, because it helps to show the overall stance of the forum. And so far, the overall stance of the forum is of INDIFFERENCE… indifferance is not HATE.

Edog wrote:

How many of you would save a female from a life or death scenario knowing ahead of time it may well cost you your life?

I wouldn’t. And the reason is simple: my life matters as well. My life is as worthy as hers. If I knew I would die in order for her to live, and I don’t know her, than I am sorry, but I will not risk my life for a strange female. In fact, I would go to the extend to say, if I was on a situation where my life was in danger, I would not want anybody to come rescue me if their life were surely end on the process.

Edog wrote:

But my question is why? Why would some of you watch another person suffer and do nothing to help even when you could?

Are you suggesting that our lives matter less than of a female? Why would waste YOUR LIFE for someone else’s ONLY ON THE BASIS OF GENDER? If you are not responsible for a person predictament, helping or not helping is up to you and YOU ALONE. You shouldn’t have to justify your actions for not bailing SOMEONE ELSE’S from their OWN MISTAKES. I have a question for you then. If people were saying the same thing of a man. If people were talking about letting a MAN suffer the consequences of HIS OWN MISTAKES, would you be questioning the people that were refusing to help? They are not making the situation worse, they are just NOT BAILING THE GUY OUT. I have the impression that you wouldn’t. Because he is a man, you see. He is bound to be REPSONSIBLE FOR HIS ACTIONS. Than why, in the name of the NINE F~~~ING HELLS, would concession be made for a FEMALE? Does empathy helps? Absolutely. But each one of us know best how far are we willing or even ABLE to go. Shaming a man for not helping a woman for bailing her out from the situation she put her self in, on the sole basis that she is a woman, and he is man, is stupid. Specially when women in general has been spitting on men’s faces for f~~~ing DECADES NOW.

Edog wrote:

Because the difference between some of you and me is that knowing ahead of time that you wouldn’t save me, I’d still save you just the same.

Are you a woman? Cause I though we you were talking about saving a WOMAN.

Edog wrote:

Can you guys see where I’m going with this?

It looks like a little of white knighting to me, but carry on.

Edog wrote:

If her life holds no value, then yours holds none either. How many of you would single out women and seek intentionally not to aid them specifically because they are females?

Well, that is the whole point of why we are in such a predictament isn’t it? It is this idea that simply “being” gives you value. I believe value can be measured, to a certain degree, with ACTIONS. Although all life has a certain value, what you DO gives more value to your life. You are preaching equality of OUTCOME, and I am totally AGAINST this idea. Give everybody the same OPPORTUNITY and let them choose their fate. Women’s life has the same VALUE as a men’s life. And since a men’s life have no value other than what he can produce, neither does a woman. They want to be equal? So do I. and that’s how equal MEN see each other. If you disagree, then I look forward for you to defend mangina’s, white knights, SIMPS, and male feminits when we tell them to f~~~ off as well. I am not advocating for violence or defending the advocacy of violencea gainst ANYONE, but by CROM I will not condemn another man for not wanting to sacrifice HIS F~~~ING LIFE to save a woman (or any other hman being for that matter) if he DOESN’T WANT TO or simply CAN’T. Neither will I condemn him for saying HARSH BLOODY WORDS!

If women are equal to men, they better get a bloody thicker SKIN!

Cheers.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Keymaster wrote:

I could only aspire to saying it so perfectly in fewer sentences as you just did.

Having to repeat the same basic truth over and over is very helpful for refining it down to its base elements.

But you’re probably already well aware of that.

I’ve used the bear trap a lot. One of these days I’m going to start an archive so I can just copy and paste every time I see certain arguments pop up again and again. Or maybe just an index to the archives here, because most of this stuff is already well covered.

[Bl4ckSh33pParticipant 274]

I don’t love women, but I don’t hate them either though. I’m just indifferent towards them.

I hate to break it to you, but what people call "love" is just a chemical reaction that compels animals to breed. It hits hard Morty then it slowly fades leaving you stranded in a failing marriage. I did it. Your parents are going to do it. Break the cycle Morty, rise above, focus on science. -Rick Sanchez

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

And another thing:

Edog wrote:

Why would some of you watch another person suffer and do nothing to help even when you could?

Because often it’s the only way they’ll learn. Especially since most of their suffering is self inflicted.

If you save a woman from herself, she’ll only learn that she will be rescued when she makes bad choices. So she will continue to make bad choices.

But if you leave her to solve her own problem and work to end her own suffering, she may well learn her lesson and stop making bad choices in the future. And if she doesn’t? Well then there’s no helping her regardless. Her problems are not your problems. She is not your problem.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

sidecar wrote:

I’ve used the bear trap a lot. One of these days I’m going to start an archive so I can just copy and paste every time I see certain arguments pop up again and again. Or maybe just an index to the archives here, because most of this stuff is already well covered.

In a real world conversation I would say it even MORE succinctly….
for the sake of humor, entertainment, and shutting them up on the spot.

“YOU JUST HATE WOMEN!!!!!!!!”

“What? I LOVE women! There is NO better place to deposit sperm.”

Done.

But because @edog is a man, we need more evidence and intellectual clout – preferably a good metaphor or three. So good work from everyone. This is a forum read by men, and it’s not as easy to convince a white knight, because he would take as much offense to my retort as a woman would – even though it’s POSITIVE comment and a COMPLIMENT to women. But they don’t see it as such. So when the accusation of “misogyny” comes from another man, the boxing gloves really have to come off. It’s going to get bloody, and you need a knock out punch (and several more sentences) to send it right out of the park.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[StandUpGuyParticipant 334]

Edog wrote:

Once you begin to understand women, you begin to realize that they can’t really be understood, at least not in any personal manner.

I disagree. They can be understood. The word you may be looking for is capricious. That is easy to understand.

There is a big difference between pointing out behavior and hate.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

StandUpGuy wrote:

I disagree. They can be understood.

You betcha. And not only understood… but explained as damn near predictable with exacting precision.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Keymaster wrote:

: “YOU JUST HATE WOMEN!!!!!!!!”
:“What? I LOVE women! There is NO better place to deposit sperm.”

: “YOU JUST HATE WOMEN!!!!!!!!”
: “But I love ladies. Do you know any?”

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

“Because the difference between some of you and me is that knowing ahead of time that you wouldn’t save me, I’d still save you just the same.”

Busted…..

The litter box is waiting.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Edog wrote:

How many of you would save a female from a life or death scenario knowing ahead of time it may well cost you your life? I would. Because for me, yeah, she’s a female and she represents a great many things I despise, however she’s also a human being.

Yeah. She’s a human being… who thinks of you as less than the gum under her shoe.
You can’t afford to be this naive.

For that reason, I would’t do a goddam thing to help her. Not anymore.
It’s not even the same as treating her badly. It’s just… not helping her.

She “doesn’t need a man”…. REMEMBER???

If I saw a woman struggling for her life, I would yell “YOU GO GIRL!!!!!”
There is a slight chance I would assist, if – and only if – it represented 0% risk to my personal safety.

But since a woman will accuse you of “rape” for being a police officer who gave her a ticket for driving without a license….. she’s on her own. If the Titanic were sinking today, women would be used as life preservers. They brought that upon themselves.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Edog wrote:

But I see people posting s~~~ on here like “I wouldn’t p~~~ on a woman if she were on fire”, or posting hypothetical scenarios where others join in only to tell us all about just how miserable for the females they would make it, and how they’d love to flip the tables and control the female for once. I see people advocating that women should be slaves and aren’t worthy of being treated as anything but property. Basically, I see what I would consider to be some very deluded and hateful souls who come here to post their hatred. And some of them think it’s funny as they type it.

We had MADDOG thrown out of the forums for that. And then again the NEXT DAY when he came back again…. as the user “DEATH”…. and the next day as the user “CREW CREW”…. and then the following Monday when s/he came back AGAIN.

Are you related to that user? “EDOG”??

Because you’re only bringing up what HE said. The same user 4 business days in a row – all deleted immediately.
Not what anyone else here said.

Since you joined, if you search the forums for the word “slaves” you will not find a SINGLE post by anyone else here suggesting “women are slaves” or to be “treated as slaves” by anyone but the users I mentioned above. And they were all deleted after being told that s~~~ is unacceptable by more than just myself.

So what the f~~~ is the problem exactly?

Any member who was present can verify that more than a few of us joined in to explain that user why it’s WRONG and “controlling women” is not MGTOW – by any stretch of the imagination. Shall we bring out the response to those hateful posts? It’s all backed up. It’s really no trouble because we’re doing that anyway to slander the BBC right back again for attempting that s~~~.

If you like, send a request and we will notify you when it’s all posted with references and snapshots.

You have 24 hours to reply to what other members have said here.
We’re not in the business of giving answers to your questions and DEMANDS if you’re not going to respond to them.

These are MEN. And men are BUSY.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[EdogParticipant 254]

Holy f~~~ing s~~~. I had no clue this is what I’d come back to. White Knighting? LMAO! That’s what you guys took from that? Get the f~~~ out of here! I guess some of you just aren’t spiritual in nature, and therefor you simply missed every single driving point I was getting at, almost entirely.

F~~~ me. Morlock is the only one that nailed it. I could have posted his words verbatim. He took what he perceived to be the deeper point and that’s what he responded to. His last sentence was the icing though.

It’s late where I am and I don’t even think I’ve got the energy to focus on some of the responses and show just how badly the point was missed, almost entirely it would seem. So, I suppose at some point tomorrow I’ll get on and go through and see just how bad it’s been warped and twisted up by then. Wow. Total tunnel vision on the female scenarios, and they weren’t even the focus. The focus was what laid underneath. But nobody ever looks underneath. Sad really.

And apparently, or at least I am being led to perceive that Sidecar’s bear trap is being posted AT me, as if I don’t already possess the knowledge. Now, if that’s the case, then it would show that another several points of what I said were completely missed, otherwise, you would have seen the bear trap present already in my post several times over. I agree wholeheartedly. It’s the perfect analogy. Why would you ever stick your dick in a bear trap? It’s pretty stupid right? Kind of like a relationship with a female, right? Yes. Yes indeed. A FEMALE. She’s toxic, and if you touch her, you’ll regret it. But as a human, she holds value. That’s all. Did I not display that I was fully aware of all of the various ways and manners including some tongue in cheek which we express our knowledge of women? But when it comes to their values as a person it’s evident that this isn’t the same issue. My point was to simply point out that if you can’t justify your feelings, then your feelings have no justification.

But yeah, I’m White Knighting. Let’s roll with that. Let’s label this dude for having a thought and an opinion, one that we didn’t even comprehend. Great.

And KM…It’s so late I couldn’t truly focus on your posts. They went immediately into areas I don’t even know what the f~~~ is being referred to or why. So I’ll need to be sure I can give it the attention it needs since you just went right at it. S~~~…maybe it was the damn title I gave the topic. F~~~, I don’t know. But I’ll check in tomorrow and sift through all this and see who has said what.

 

 

[DocParticipant 112]

Actually it looks more like ZuberiTau nailed it.

@edog nobody misunderstood you. You were quoted directly and the responses were directly in response to what you typed. Don’t accuse others of twisting it or misunderstanding you.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Doc wrote:

Actually it looks more like ZuberiTau nailed it.

Yeah that was a PERFECT hawkeye from ZuberiTau. Talk about zeroing in on the needle in the haystack. EDOG comes in demanding and expecting other members to admit to being “misogynists” and didn’t get the response he was expecting… so now it’s “LMAO GET THE F~~~ OUT OF HERE”.

???

Can someone else explain to this dickstain it doesn’t work like that?
I don’t have the patience for this s~~~ anymore.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts