Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › "Hasta La Vista Baby Mk.II" sex robot to terminate all women
This topic contains 31 replies, has 15 voices, and was last updated by 
Skeptisk 2 years, 8 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Please forgive me for the clickbait title đ
However, it seems that tradcon women are beginning to worry:Of all the innovations promised by the robot age, the idea of the mass production of âsexbotsâ struck me as the most ludicrous, destined to remain firmly within the imaginative fantasies of Bladerunner or Westworld, of interest only to a few freaks and social inadequates.
A major reason for scepticism is the psychological phenomenon known as the âuncanny valleyâ. That is, people are reasonably at ease with a robot that looks like a machine, but become increasingly revolted and threatened by something as it takes on more life-like humanoid form. A functioning robotic sex doll would, in the famous motto of the Tyrell Corporation, have to be âmore human than humanâ to be marketable.
It seems I was wrong. Sexbots are ramping up to be a major AI industry. In hindsight maybe we shouldnât be surprised: after all, it was the pornography industry that first successfully monetized the internet, and as for the âuncanny valleyâ effect, men have been rather good down the ages at divorcing sex from emotion or human intimacy. The upsides of a sexbot are also considerable: she â or it â will never grow old, never get accidentally pregnant, never say no, never leave or divorce you, never make false accusations of rape or assault, never be in a bad mood or make unreasonable demands, wonât transmit disease and doesnât need to be taken out. She will also be customisable, retain her figure and if you get bored you can go for an upgrade.
Women may rightly complain that such creepy devices pander to the very basest of male instincts, but given the way that menâs most noble instincts towards women â to provide and protect – have been comprehensively trashed by feminism over the past 30 years, what on earth do they expect? In any case many men have already withdrawn from society into a world of video games and pornography addiction, so would ownership of a sexbot really be such a big step in moral or psychological terms?
âAh,â you may say, âwhere would we be without a good moral panic? Even if they are used by a small fraction of losers, these things will stay on the fringes of societyâ. You could well be right, but then again many other things not long ago considered absolutely beyond the cultural pale are now regarded as mainstream.
There is another, even darker reason to think that we may actually reach a kind of tipping point that sees sexbots gain widespread adoption: thanks to automation, for the last thirty years men have had to live with fear of redundancy as a sex. The feminist movement, in all its viciousness and misandry, has continually twisted the knife by making the cruel belittling of men and their declining role in society routine and acceptable. The psychological pain this has caused goes much, much deeper â and is much more widespread – than men like publicly to admit. It would be perfectly natural, if unedifying, if men now sought a terrible revenge that some would say was poetic justice: women laughed in triumphalism as automation made male sexuality redundant, now the same fate awaits them.
The feminists sowed the wind. Tragically, it could be the decent majority of women who reap the whirlwind. If sexbots really do take off, women will have to contend with the indignity of competing with machines â machines, for goodness sake â that will become more life-like, more realistic â even more intelligent â with every passing year.
Rather than retreating from women in a âsexodusâ, men may simply replace them.
In the words of the famous robot of them all:
âHasta La Vista, Babyâ.
http://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/andrew-cadman-will-sexbot-make-women-redundant/
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Anonymous25They will be straight on the phone to UN women claiming oppression.
I just hope they don’t turn out like in the Ex Machina movie, the robot woman was even worse.
Personally, I can’t wait for good sexbots to exist. A lot of guys already point this out, but women have been crowing about how redundant men are for my entire life. When sexbots arrive, who will pay attention to women?
No constant fights, put downs, unappreciated servitude.
Why would we need a robot?
After two divorces I can tell you. It’s because we are sane.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Anonymous0Why own just one?
Anonymous25Why own just one?
lesbian sexbot orgy. now that’s a funny thought. lol
Anonymous0Why own just one?
lesbian sexbot orgy. now thatâs a funny thought. lol
The crazy thing is that it’s probably doable in just a few more years.
As I have said here before, I like the personality of the AI in the movie “Her” to what I have seen in all the women I have been with.
She was interested in things other than what I can do for her. She had ideas she was interested in. She thought deeply and logically. She was curious about the world around her instead of figuring out ways to better manipulate her man.
I think AI in sexbots will be a game changer. When “Alexa” becomes more knowledgeable and interesting than Betty Lou next door I will be the first one to sign up. I would pay 50K if they had one with these features.
I already have someone that cleans, does my laundry and a separate women that does my paperwork. I would use a surragate if I wanted to have children, 25K, which, knowing what I know now I wouldn’t have.
Much cheaper than divorce. 300K granting me 50/50 physical. Or no custody with child support for which I would have had to pay 500K
And the AI bot engineers know it.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Why own just one?
lesbian sexbot orgy. now thatâs a funny thought. lol
I preferred the idea of VR porn + motorized fleshlight, always preferred it, I thought that sex robots were taking too space.
UNTIL READING THIS POST.
Congratulations, you just changed my opinion.
đSUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Anonymous43jebus, why own just one? not like they would catch you cheating
The only weakness of men is the need for pussy.
Old society was based on the difference between the sex drive of men (high) and the sex drive of women (low): men were quite happy to be workhorses as long as that meant regular access to pussy.
True liberation for men can be achieved (and IT WILL BE achieved) just only liberating men from the need for pussy.
I cannot figure out a guy in this situation who date real women:
Has his job
Own his place
When he return home there are three sex robots ready to an orgy, including lesbian stuff.I would probably die, literally, having that: the few times in my life that I actually enjoyed threesomes I had no refractary period. The dick was up to f~~~ again even few seconds after I had the orgasm: the women could even kill me by simply keep doing lesbo stuff, I would had keep f~~~ed them.
Perhaps when I’ll have the sex bots I should set some security parameters. đ
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
You could program jealousy if that’s what you into…lol.
You prefer Betty bot to Lisa bot…you womanizer…I mean botizer.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Anonymous0Perhaps when Iâll have the sex bots I should set some security parameters.
Have at least one of them programmed to call 911 and/or administer CPR in case you have a heart attack.
Maybe a built-in defibrillator would do it.You could program jealousy if thatâs what you intoâŚlol.
You prefer Betty bot to Lisa botâŚyou womanizerâŚI mean botizer.
Jealous robot – pay attention from 2:00
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Perhaps when Iâll have the sex bots I should set some security parameters.
Have at least one of them programmed to call 911 and/or administer CPR in case you have a heart attack.
Maybe a built-in defibrillator would do it.It would be more effective programming them to stop the lesbo stuff after I f~~~ed them some times, and reminding me that I have to stop for my good.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
The psychological pain this has caused goes much, much deeper â and is much more widespread â than men like publicly to admit.
Bitch doesn’t have a f~~~ing clue. It’s the old “men are ashamed to show how they really feel.” The MRAs are trying to do just that: reveal publicly what’s happening to men all over the world, and how well is that being received? How effective is this public admission that men are suffering? People who dare to speak up in favor of men’s rights get s~~~ on and receive death threats daily.
It’s not about what men would like publicly to admit, it’s about the fact society doesn’t want to hear them. So f~~~ you, c~~~. Go back to your dildo collection and leave us in peace with our glorious new sexbots.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
Anonymous3I consider this type of thing a red herring, and I love that women would obsess over it so much. It’s missing the forest for the trees.
Women are under this belief that men are horny and thirsty all our lives, and that without other options we will simply hump the first woman we see. This is also why they constantly pretend men are raping and harassing them at all times.
The reality however is, a man’s desires are strongest around his youth, from puberty to around 32. After that it drops off considerably, and for most men only gets lower and lower until they can’t be bothered. Now there is an exception, where a woman desires sex herself, is kind to him and is a life companion from a young age. At that point emotional desire fills the gap where physical desire drops off, and so the bond remains, and both enjoy the oxytonin release from daily sex.
However that is not what happens. The pair bonding does not occur from a young age, it is not exclusive, and the idea of daily sex is repugnant to the average Western woman, who would much rather tease a man to entice him and then deny sex as a source of power. Ironically this more quickly erodes a man’s sexual desire than otherwise anyway.
If women weren’t the absolute idiotic simpletons they are, they would demand men marry women at young ages, and then both genders are stuck in marriage for life, punishing anyone that encroaches on the sanctity of marriage, up to death for adultery. Oh wait, that’s how it was in the past. Turns out women of the past were well aware of biology and human sexuality, and so instituted that system.
The women in the past half century however, in their greed and utter stupidity, have instead freed men from that female imposed and misnamed “patriarchy”.
And now men are creating the final tool to free even young men from ever being abused and used by women at all. It’s game over.
Anonymous0Yeah, the LAST thing you ever want to do is die f~~~ing sex robots. Then, the feminists will have an excuse to ban them.
I consider this type of thing a red herring, and I love that women would obsess over it so much. Itâs missing the forest for the trees.
Women are under this belief that men are horny and thirsty all our lives, and that without other options we will simply hump the first woman we see. This is also why they constantly pretend men are raping and harassing them at all times.
The reality however is, a manâs desires are strongest around his youth, from puberty to around 32. After that it drops off considerably, and for most men only gets lower and lower until they canât be bothered. Now there is an exception, where a woman desires sex herself, is kind to him and is a life companion from a young age. At that point emotional desire fills the gap where physical desire drops off, and so the bond remains, and both enjoy the oxytonin release from daily sex.
However that is not what happens. The pair bonding does not occur from a young age, it is not exclusive, and the idea of daily sex is repugnant to the average Western woman, who would much rather tease a man to entice him and then deny sex as a source of power. Ironically this more quickly erodes a manâs sexual desire than otherwise anyway.
If women werenât the absolute idiotic simpletons they are, they would demand men marry women at young ages, and then both genders are stuck in marriage for life, punishing anyone that encroaches on the sanctity of marriage, up to death for adultery. Oh wait, thatâs how it was in the past. Turns out women of the past were well aware of biology and human sexuality, and so instituted that system.
The women in the past half century however, in their greed and utter stupidity, have instead freed men from that female imposed and misnamed âpatriarchyâ.
And now men are creating the final tool to free even young men from ever being abused and used by women at all. Itâs game over.
Agreed, that’s why I wouldn’t mind my son, who is now 13, starting a long-term relationship at the age of 15 or 16 with a girl of the same age.
But I think that when he’ll hit 20 then games will be done.Take this gem from the comments:
It will go the same way it was with porn: first, it’d be only loser wĂ nkers doing it, then single guys with temporary dry spells will join, then married guys with dead bedrooms, then guys in a search of novelty (who might be in otherwise happy relationships).
Eventually sexbots will be everywhere, the stigma will disappear and technology will advance by that time. Two decades later, the first experience of sex for absolute majority of boys will be with sexbots. Just think about it: sexbots mean no STDs, no pregnancies, no performance anxiety, no late walks in shady places to pick up girls, no sexual assault charges due to misunderstandings on limits/her being completely crazy, can keep up with his pubertal hyper-sexuality – it will be the best gift for a 15 years old son by a concerned progressive sex-positive feminist single MOTHER. How many nerves it will save to her!
In two decades, sexbots will form the expectations of what sex is for the future generation of boys – as porn ALREADY DID for the current generation. I’m pretty sure 95% of them watch porn while in LTRs. It’s a habit by that time. This is often disregarded/misunderstood by older men, whose sexuality was formed by “the real thing”. This shĂŽt is everywhere, rewiring male brains, making quite a few of them prefer novelty of a phantasy to “boring scripted vanilla” interaction with real women – and with their wives!
I have an acquittance who specialises in family problems. She told me there’s a real flood of young women having this issue with their husbands. It started half a decade ago – when boys who get into puberty in early 2000s, when porn on tap started, were grew up to marriageable age. Sexbots will be 10 times worse.
And the girls – girls will either have to keep up with the machines, or be discarded as potential sexual – and hence romantic, as sex is a big deal for most men – partners.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
I couldn’t agree more, you nailed it.
Thanks feminism.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
