Has the law been Feminized?

[Anonymous 12]

The term Outlaw originally meant a person who broke the law and therefore was no longer protected by the law. This seems to have changed a great deal in my life time. It seems now that an outlaw is someone who breaks the law and then has the law protect them so they can hurt other people.

I know this is also due to Left wing politics making a mockery of everything.

To me, it is so straight forward, someone commits a crime, is found guilty they go to prison or even get the death penalty. No games, no short sentences, no paroles, simple.

Another example, in Australia I keep reading about these Jihadi’s who want to come back to Australia after fighting for ISIS. Why are we letting them back in? Why is it even a question or problem?

Why do criminals have human rights?

It makes me think of the wishy washy female mentality. A man’s law would be far more simple and effective.

[Anonymous 42]

The law is toiletized! Turd fishing for justice! All you can expect is s~~~ on both ends of the stick! Your choice of sticks…

[RomulusParticipant 4667]

I think in a way it has been feminized. And I think you have maybe hit upon how. I started noticing that some of the laws we live under really are not based on an objective standard. Men do much better with an objective rule. Women seem to like rules/law that takes in to account their emotional state at the time. Take work place harassment for example. If you mention to a woman that the outfit she is wearing looks really nice, it may or may not be a violation of work place harassment rules. Really depends on her mood that day. One day she may say thanks, the next time she may make a complaint to HR and you’re in some s~~~ storm. The rule doesn’t say “don’t make any comments on a woman’s appearance at the workplace”. No, it says if it makes the woman uncomfortable, then you are guilty of creating a hostile work environment.

So, yes, to the degree we are now basing infractions of the law on the woman’s emotional state at the time, the law is in some aspects being feminized.

How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Women also have no respect for traditional legal concepts, such as due process and evidence.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Anonymous wrote:

an outlaw is someone who breaks the law and then has the law protect them so they can hurt other people

Prison makes you more dangerous not less it has nothing to do with protecting the outlaw or even the victims but keeping up with the statistics (more people in prison equals more prisons thereby more jobs).

Outside of the prison system other arrests and fines are all about collecting tax money from the criminals (whether actual or alleged). Traffic fines, court made fines, drug fines etc all are about collecting more taxes for the government (aka billy drank at a party that had the police raid it but billy was under the approved age of 21).

Anonymous wrote:

To me, it is so straight forward, someone commits a crime, is found guilty they go to prison or even get the death penalty. No games, no short sentences, no paroles, simple.

I am against the death penalty and parole but i have no problem with short sentences (the government should not have the power to murder as it as shown it cannot be trusted even with a more are less evidence based court system).

Anonymous wrote:

Why do criminals have human rights?

I’m guessing because they are humans.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[2icebittenParticipant 147]

I could on a rant about this, you are right. I don’t want to get deep into politics but I am a conservative. in Kalifornia, I see Laws passed that give criminals a free pass while punishing law abiding citizens. It makes me angry. I could go on for days. http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-california-senate-supports-lifting-1495128128-htmlstory.html

My mission in life is not merely to survive, but to thrive; and to do so with some passion, some compassion, some humor, and some style. - Maya Angelou

[Anonymous 12]

anonymousyam wrote:

Morlock wrote:

an outlaw is someone who breaks the law and then has the law protect them so they can hurt other people

Prison makes you more dangerous not less it has nothing to do with protecting the outlaw or even the victims but keeping up with the statistics (more people in prison equals more prisons thereby more jobs).

Outside of the prison system other arrests and fines are all about collecting tax money from the criminals (whether actual or alleged). Traffic fines, court made fines, drug fines etc all are about collecting more taxes for the government (aka billy drank at a party that had the police raid it but billy was under the approved age of 21).

Morlock wrote:

To me, it is so straight forward, someone commits a crime, is found guilty they go to prison or even get the death penalty. No games, no short sentences, no paroles, simple.

I am against the death penalty and parole but i have no problem with short sentences (the government should not have the power to murder as it as shown it cannot be trusted even with a more are less evidence based court system).

Morlock wrote:

Why do criminals have human rights?

I’m guessing because they are humans.

I have a huge problem with seeing criminals as humans. They s~~~ all over other people’s rights and then scream victim and carry on about unfair treatment.

And I never said that criminals would be allowed out of prison. I don’t believe rehabilitation works.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Anonymous wrote:

I have a huge problem with seeing criminals as humans. They s~~~ all over other people’s rights and then scream victim and carry on about unfair treatment.

Biologically they fit as humans.

Anonymous wrote:

And I never said that criminals would be allowed out of prison. I don’t believe rehabilitation works.

Now that is bulls~~~ as crimes depend on their nature not just locking them away forever. Some crimes are serious some crimes are less serious you cannot judge them all on the same scale.

Some guy who holds up a gas station for money deserves less prison time then someone who went on a killing spree for example. Of course they both deserve prison time but the guy who held up the gas station probably will be released (unless he killed people).

We cannot risk innocent people being put the death none the less spending the rest of their lives in prison nor can we judge all crimes on the same scale (aka locking petty criminals for life).

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Anonymous 12]

anonymousyam wrote:

Morlock wrote:

I have a huge problem with seeing criminals as humans. They s~~~ all over other people’s rights and then scream victim and carry on about unfair treatment.

Biologically they fit as humans.

Morlock wrote:

And I never said that criminals would be allowed out of prison. I don’t believe rehabilitation works.

Now that is bulls~~~ as crimes depend on their nature not just locking them away forever. Some crimes are serious some crimes are less serious you cannot judge them all on the same scale.

Some guy who holds up a gas station for money deserves less prison time then someone who went on a killing spree for example. Of course they both deserve prison time but the guy who held up the gas station probably will be released (unless he killed people).

We cannot risk innocent people being put the death none the less spending the rest of their lives in prison nor can we judge all crimes on the same scale (aka locking petty criminals for life).

Nope. If he holds up a gas station he has traumatized innocent people. Especially if he was armed.

Sick to death of the soft c~~~ responses to crime.

Quite happy to execute people who are obviously guilty.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Anonymous wrote:

Nope. If he holds up a gas station he has traumatized innocent people. Especially if he was armed.

It does not matter if he traumautized innocent people are those are not his charges against him.

He is charged with the robbery and gets punished for the robbery not because he disturbed other people during the robbery as if we were going by that basis there are thousands of war vets, prisoners and even general civilians who are/were traumautized by the actions of the government but we do not charge the officials for it (we would have thrown everyone in government in prison if it happened none the less the majority of the cops).

Anonymous wrote:

Sick to death of the soft c~~~ responses to crime.

I do not care if it is so called soft c~~~ i demand evidence as i believe in justice. If someone is getting locked away for decades none the less being put to death by the state (which gives the state too much power) there better be a hell of alot of evidence and the punishment must fit the crime (drug dealers not spending decades of their life in prison).

If one innocent person gets put to death by the state it is far too many as their deaths was an injustice which we can never take back.

Anonymous wrote:

Quite happy to execute people who are obviously guilty.

The term obviously guilty is what gets innocent men put to death. Back in the f~~~ing old days of the KKK it was clear to the white knights that the negro was obviously guilty of raping that white angel.

In no way did the woman want to f~~~ the negro, cover up the cheating after f~~~ing him or even just hated the negro for whatever reason rather it must have been a evil rapist since the accusation merits the action and of course he must have obviously been guilty of the crime.

The term obviously guilty applies to anyone in anyone’s subjective view as according to you X person is obviously guilty of the crime for Y reason with Y reason not being hard evidence or data.

Now when it comes to the death penalty itself it has shown itself to be expensive and ineffective to stopping crime. There are still thousands of people on death row and still thousands of murders are committed every with the most being committed in the states that use death row (California, Texas and Florida) and with the death row it still takes an average of 15 years for the execution to take place sometimes even longer (the longest time was 40 years).

And when it comes to cheapening the death penalty it is already bad enough with innocents getting put to death just quickening up the death sentence and killing the obviously guilty will have the blood of thousands of innocent people on the our hands (as we allowed it to happen).

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

oh man, like already stated one could rant on this all night long.
I personally think feminized is the incorrect term, unless you look at liberal socialist as feminist. An argument could be made that is the case.
The law is being used by groups to destroy the foundation of the “classic” western style society. Interpretations never intended by the law writers.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Author]

Posts