Dear ladies. The gravy train is about to get derailed.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

enabling her to maintain what was described as the “extraordinary and exorbitant” lifestyle she was used to during her marriage.

Why they f~~~ does “getting used to” a particular lifestyle entitle a woman to keep it forever?

If a man quits his job, does his former employer have to keep giving him money because he’s “used to receiving regular paychecks”?

[FaxmodemParticipant 1415]

sidecar wrote:

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

enabling her to maintain what was described as the “extraordinary and exorbitant” lifestyle she was used to during her marriage.

Why they f~~~ does “getting used to” a particular lifestyle entitle a woman to keep it forever?

If a man quits his job, does his former employer have to keep giving him money because he’s “used to receiving regular paychecks”?

Cause she thinks she’s a f~~~ing princess and has to have her cake too.

Us men didn't start the battle of the sexes, but we're clearly going to win it via the simple tactic of just leaving the battlefield in contempt."

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Faxmodem wrote:

Cause she thinks she’s a f~~~ing princess and has to have her cake too.

Of course she does. But why the f~~~ have the law and the courts agreed with her?

(These are, of course, rhetorical questions. I’m just highlighting what unjust blue pill c~~~ worshiping simps the courts have always been. And yet feminists still call them “unfair to women”.)

[Author]

Posts