Men, I call upon your wisdom for a different perspective for an interesting situation.
I have had the pleasure of waxing philosophical about the concepts of relationships with what could be described as the female equivalent of a MGTOW.
I am quite aware of the NAWALT fallacy, and potential for things getting generally f~~~ed up. I had embraced the MGTOW philosophy (knowing not the name until of late) due to the nature of my personal perceptions. An extremely sensitive tactile sense that provides a holistic view of objects or buildings through interpretation of vibrations within the material, giving me a sort of touch phobia -which I have recently overcome. Accompanying this is a synesthetic interpretation of people, meaning that abstract concepts are applied to faces I see and somehow manage to manifest themselves in some physical manner. For example a woman resembling the letter “v”, sunlit ocean depths, or consisting entirely of cylinders. The feeling I get when people display emotions (even subtle ones) have allowed me to play the part of the older brother to my older brothers. My advice has yet to steer them wrong.
I am fully aware of the sad state of Western women, thanks to the manosphere and MGTOW fellows. I have sufficient psychological reasons to never indulge in the hedonism endemic to our marxist culture. Then, why would I consider traditional courtship, with a low likelihood of success?
This woman has been around many feminists, she has remained unchanged. She doesn’t sexualize herself, dressing conservatively in slacks, sweaters, shoulder-length hair and devotion to her study of history. Perhaps such conservative behavior and diligence is a cultural remnant as a result of her Asian heritage. She retains a level of poise and dignity that is rather uncommon; were she exposed to more nefarious intentions, she would make a wonderful villain material.
In our discussion, I gently nudged her into realizing her lack of romantic interest stemmed from her desire to make her weak-willed male friends more comfortable. As a result, no one desired a romantic relationship with her, resulting in her lack of interest, and ability to process emotional information.
I -on the other hand- am quite adept at interpreting emotional information. I suppose that is because I process such information synesthetically.
As the leader of a communal living program in college, I interact with this woman on a daily basis. During this time two of the other program residents became romantically attached at the hip expeditiously, which was apparently the lady’s first observation of a real-life human relationship, which she was uncomfortable with. I explained that the two lovebirds were a rather fantastic exception -which I could analyze further here, but that would be tangential, albeit fun.
In summary, her nervous nature was her preconceptions of traditional pair-bonding and potential for never seeing me again. I graduate in about a month. Such concerns would be moot, as I will be living (relatively) locally.
I described my desire for companionship, and -despite what she may think- I find her a good person, deserving of being desired romantically. However, I explicitly proclaimed that my life would go on without her, perhaps a little more boring, but it would continue nonetheless.
The only problem I see is the morbidly obese feminist who has latched onto her in some sort. I plan on planting the seeds to properly discredit the feminists character.
We made an informal agreement to take such a development slow, and “without labels”. We saw a movie, I paid for, politely stating not to worry about paying for it, but accepting financial compensation nonetheless. I limited physical contact to the occasional touching of thigh. Our conversations rambled here and there, learning about each other.
I hear you cry at such potentially “beta” behavior. Worry not: I know better. I know that all is fair in love and war. I have been hailed as intelligent by others, as being surprisingly social for being driven by logic. All under the guise of simply enjoying human interaction. I know to move with such calculated and cool precision, to manipulate and shape my life into what I want it to be by manipulating others. I have the knowledge, and edge that many would kill to have.
I will not lose. I will not fall. I will use every weapon in my arsenal in this war. I may strive for the impossible, but it is only during war a country has its greatest developments
Cato 4 years, 7 months ago.
