Government Aided Hypergamy

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

This is and interesting idea on hypergamy and the government’s effect on it.

http://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaembed/images/1770/6334/original.jpg

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 16]

Im a strong independent woman raising my childs alone from the money i get from taxpayers.

In brazil (was there three Months ago)
A pall of mine told me woman get three childrens from three diferent males And get 25% Pay from each.
They get free money, theyr kid, And CHAD THUNDERC~~~ breaking their pelvis on bed.

I got admit they are geniuses ??

[TuneoutParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I got admit they are geniuses

Nah,they just know how to run a good con.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

Interesting topic, term i like very much is bureaugamy, methaporical marriage to the state. Now in Europe this is really rampant, tax rates and distibution of wealth is on a gender robbery scale. But on the other hand most countries here dont have alimony.

Either way how i see it, since the collapse of traditional family marriage is net negative for males, financially and emotionally. And while in USA females get incentives to divorce rape due to alimony, in EU females get incentives to divorce to suck off government subsidies for single females, while on the same time hunting around for beta cucks.

So yeah, governemt has a lot to do with state of affairs. Or better, giving females rights to vote was a stupid thing to do, trusting them they will not abuse the power. Good idea right guys ? Females are honest beings, lol

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Freeman_K wrote:

bureougamy, methaporical marriage to the state.

I’ll have to research that term more.

We have lot of ghetto whores who keep popping out babies, so they can get financial aid.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Sad but true. Back in the day if a couple had kids it was in both of their best interests, and the best interests of the kids to put all their effort into sticking together and making it work. Now its rewarding for the woman to break it off, even if it screws the men and children over. I think we all either know personally or have heard stories of way too many women who walked away from divorce(even with no kids involved) considerably more well off than they’d have ever been if they had remained single. The system is a joke.

I face this s~~~ all the time with women my age. They’d love to date me but they come with so much baggage its just not worth the risk. If I’m stupid enough to marry suddenly their debts they acquired prior to me become my responsibility. Even if they pay their own debts back it doesn’t f~~~ing matter, because in the divorce half or more of what I accumulate during that time is going to go to them anyhow. If I save 2k a month from my paycheck and they pay back 1k a month in debt from their paycheck…its literally the same end game in the event of a divorce as if we put that 3k a month into a combined account and paid off debt/saved out of joint funds. If the have kids instead of just monetary debt the risk/reward ratio is even worse!

Divorce rates would plummet overnight and the amount of single moms on the market would fall over time if single mommy programs weren’t so generous, non-joint assets(like 401ks and real estate only in one person’s name) were not on the table in divorce, and child support was changed to a static amount rather than an amount that scales up with income so getting knocked up by a well off male was no longer a viable. If the government said maybe it takes 1000 a month to raise a kid, both parents have to come up with 500 and custody by default goes 50/50…the whole “trapping a guy with a kid” career would be non-existent.

[Anonymous 11]

Beer wrote:

non-joint assets(like 401ks and real estate only in one person’s name) were not on the table in divorce,

Yep, bought and paid for with my hard earned cash and investment profits real estate only in my name for a long, long time up for grabs during a divorce rape just because she’s bored. Ain’t gonna happen to me.

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

It’s the VMS – Vagina Monetization Scam. The key is for the mother to snag a high-earning man (or three) to procreate with and not an unemployed Chad Thunderc~~~ for the scam to have maximum long-term financial benefit. When the youngest child hits 18, they will try to rinse and repeat the process for another 18 years of government sponsored hypergamy.

Australian Child-Support Rates –

#ManOut

[Author]

Posts