Global Warming caused by Unfettered Femnism

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

This is in response to Jack Reacher in another thread but I thought it could be it’s own thread.

If you think about it, Feminism is the biggest single cause of global warming.

Check out the graph below. The US contributes more toward global warming than any other country yet has only 4.43 % of the population. The only other country who is close is china with 19% of the population, nearly 1 in 5 of the worlds population. One in five of the women world wide. So the top 5 most entitled women ever born on planet earth are spending 10x what the slaves that make their goods are making. Talk about a wage gap…tha’s a 1,000 % wage gap. Thanks feminists for hiding your dirty laundry.

And the US run by out of control spending by our strong independent women:

Table 2. Top 20 contributors to global temperature change, ranked in order of their total climate contribution, and including a breakdown of
the contribution of different types of emissions. All values here are given in ◦C of global temperature change.
Rank Country Total Fossil Fuel CO2 Land-use CO2 All CO2 Non-CO2 GHG All GHG Aerosols
1 United States 0.151
2 China 0.063
3 Russia 0.059
4 Brazil 0.049
5 India 0.047
6 Germany 0.033
7 United Kingdom 0.032
8 France 0.016
9 Indonesia 0.015
10 Canada 0.013
11 Japan 0.013
12 Mexico 0.010
13 Thailand 0.009
14 Columbia 0.009
15 Argentina 0.009
16 Poland 0.007
17 Nigeria 0.007
18 Venezuela 0.007
19 Australia 0.006
20 Netherlands 0.006

Spending. US women spend $32,869.00, top spender in the world, Chinese women $3,926.00 number 102 spenders in the world. Ameriskanks consume 10X the amount spent by Chinese women and if you tell your American wife to stop the spending that is now officially classed as financial abuse and you lose your kids.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_household_final_consumption_expenditure_per_capita

We talk about shutting coal mines and putting more men out of work.

But what if dug a little deaper.

And I never thought of the ecosystem damage done by feminism.

Used to be big family purchase decisions were made “the family” which consisted of an agreement between the husband and wife on major purchases and in the non-feminist world it still is.

Now, as American the wives are trained in Women’s Study Classes to be independent, to make decisions independent of their husbands,they have taken over the finances and are responsible for 85% of purchases in the US.

Women make or influence 85% of all purchasing decisions, and purchase over 50% of traditional male products, including automobiles, home improvement products and consumer electronics.

http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2012/01/24/the-top-30-stats-you-need-to-know-when-marketing-to-women/

Since we all know that the consumption of goods in the US is one of the prime movers of damage to our ecosystem.

By simple deduction it must be that unfettered spending by females, unfettered feminism, is one of the major causes contributing to global warming.

Speak of an angle no one would ever talk about. I’m going to do some research on this one. It sounds like a real strike against feminism.

I guess the most logical solution to curbing global warming is to limit the number of designer handbags and shoes that our Ameriskanks can spend their husbands hard earned money he earned while he could be doing the dishes. F@cking misogynist, patriarch.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[SurlymonocleParticipant 38]

I would add that are large numbers of feminist that are willfully ignorant of how things are made.  They demand more metal and then try to ban mining.  I had the misfortune to actually talk to one that honestly believed that lithium was made in a factory.  They tend to read “shock” articles by communication majors who have no idea about the technical aspects that they are reporting on.  I recently read such and article, it was describing “pollution” in the soil, and to a laymen, it was “scary” as all get out.  However, to anyone who actually understands how assays work, it was friggin’ awesome!  The “pollution” in question is a good sign that gold/copper/zinc deposits are near by, of course, the article was written by feminist (she felt the need to point it out in her handle) who thought it was terrible and completely missed the point.  A group of local women went on to try to ban mining in the area until they get could the naturally occurring “pollution” under control.  I don’t know if they were successful, but if they were they manage to raise the carbon footprint quite a bit.

[Anonymous 5]

This thread is a pleasant surprise. When I saw the headline, I was like… “LOL what? :P”. Then I clicked it and you delieverd. Thanks for this.

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

It goes without saying that I agree. I have stated before that a government focusing on bulls~~~ feminist lies, distracts resources and energy from far more pressing concerns, not that those c~~~s give a s~~~. They are so completely narcissistic, neurotic, and f~~~ing useless they want their own interests satisfied to the sacrifice of f~~~ing everything.

The consumerism aspect indicts the rest of the females.

In short they are all f~~~ing in it for themselves.

[Author]

Posts