George Takei on a gay Sulu in next Star Trek

Topic by

Home Forums MGTOW Central George Takei on a gay Sulu in next Star Trek

This topic contains 19 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Anthony  Anthony 3 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #263715
    +5

    Anonymous
    24

    You know that left wing Hollywood has gone to far when a gay actor who played a straight character gets upset when they portray the same character as gay now, in what I guess is an homage to Takei’s homosexuality.

    I am no gay bashing trad-con by any means, just pointing out how far Hollywood is going in pushing LGBT and Girl Power stuff…

    In the future will Batman or Superman be gay if one of the actor’s who played them comes out of the closet one day? I mean, what the hell is going on?

    George Takei, you sir, are a motherf~~~in pimp.

    https://twitter.com/search?q=George+Takei+on+gay+Sulu&ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Esearch

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/george-takei-reacts-gay-sulu-909154

    #263775
    +5
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    Also, why the f~~~ does it matter who he is f~~~ing as long as he can steer the ship.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #263797
    +4
    Jack Harper
    Jack Harper
    Participant
    2863

    I love George Takei. Always seems like a cool dude in the interviews and stuff I’ve seen. And I have the sneaking suspicion that gay guys have long felt sorry for us straight guys cause they could always see through women’s horse s~~~. Look at Milo. Doesn’t hurt to have these dudes on our side.

    #263856
    Bobphilo
    bobphilo
    Participant
    1772

    Wait a minute Joe. Tekai is on your side in not liking the fact that straight characters are now being portrayed as gay. You should be applauding him rather than calling him names.

    #263915
    +1
    Eek
    Eek
    Participant
    1162

    The most unfortunate thing that happened as a result of Star Trek the original series is that some awesome people and actors became conflated with the characters they played on TV. Shatner will always be Kirk; Nimoy, Spock; and so on.

    Hell James Doohan landed in Normandy on D-Day but everyone knows him as Scotty. He lost a finger fighting Germany, but he hid it because he didn’t want to detract from his work.

    It is pretty cool the George Takei thinks more of his friend and collaborators vision than promoting his own personal and political agenda. I don’t think too many younger people in the attention whoring, 15 minutes of fame culture we all live in these days would do the same.

    #263922
    +1

    Anonymous
    24

    Wait a minute Joe. Tekai is on your side in not liking the fact that straight characters are now being portrayed as gay. You should be applauding him rather than calling him names.

    You are kidding? Right? Hard to tell sometimes…

    #263993
    +3
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    They think they are scoring a victory for the lgbt “community” by making a straight character gay. It doesn’t change anything in the real world. All it does is patronise gay men. Lesbian women will like it because they think it p~~~es off heterosexual men. My older brother is gay and a star trek fan. he’s fan because he likes the science fiction and the characters. he likes good character development. this is not character development. this is not good story telling. i wish they would leave politics and social engineering out of entertainment.

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #264208
    +1

    Anonymous
    24

    I wish they would leave politics and social engineering out of entertainment.

    Exactly. Unfortunately a small group of like minded people own almost all relevant mainstream media and movie production.

    #264251
    Bobphilo
    bobphilo
    Participant
    1772

    I wish they would leave politics and social engineering out of entertainment.

    Exactly. Unfortunately a small group of like minded people own almost all relevant mainstream media and movie production.

    What do you expect big money making corporations like Hollywood studios to do? They are making movies that people want to see. Their only ideology is the bottom line. The real culprits are the public that makes these movies profitable. A sign of our sick society.

    #264265
    +3
    Chir
    chir
    Participant

    And Takei is right. Why not just create a new character who is gay? Just don’t make him a red-shirt because those poor fellas don’t have much of a lifespan. 🙂 They once again are s~~~ting all over the original creator’s intention for the sake of being “social justice” relevant. When you actually have the people you are changing the character for saying “this might not be the best thing to do.”

    F~~~ING LISTEN TO THEM.

    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

    #264270
    +3
    Cap285
    Cap285
    Participant
    6007

    Just the latest franchise to fall to SJW f~~~ery.

    Been a fan since I was 4, but, goodbye Star Trek.

    Fuck this planet.
    #264284
    +2
    Anthony
    Anthony
    Participant
    2281

    Been a fan since I was 4, but, goodbye Star Trek.

    I loved the original Star Trek as a kid, but I haven’t even seen the new movies because I knew all the new movies had SJW bulls~~~ in them.

    They’ve done the same s~~~ with GhostCunsters and Mad Furiosa. They’re f~~~ing up great franchises in the name of SJW bulls~~~.

    Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

    #264294
    Bobphilo
    bobphilo
    Participant
    1772

    Wait a minute Joe. Tekai is on your side in not liking the fact that straight characters are now being portrayed as gay. You should be applauding him rather than calling him names.

    You are kidding? Right? Hard to tell sometimes…

    You must be kidding if you are calling someone who objects to the conversion of his character to gay as a “motherf~~~ing pimp”. Or do you see that term as some kind of compliment?

    #264364

    Anonymous
    24

    Wait a minute Joe. Tekai is on your side in not liking the fact that straight characters are now being portrayed as gay. You should be applauding him rather than calling him names.

    You are kidding? Right? Hard to tell sometimes…

    You must be kidding if you are calling someone who objects to the conversion of his character to gay as a “motherf~~~ing pimp”. Or do you see that term as some kind of compliment?

    I did mean it as a joking compliment. I guess I forget where I am sometimes with all the lurking dinosaur tradcons here… Your problem, not mine.

    #264366
    +1

    Anonymous
    24

    Wait a minute Joe. Tekai is on your side in not liking the fact that straight characters are now being portrayed as gay. You should be applauding him rather than calling him names.

    You are kidding? Right? Hard to tell sometimes…

    You must be kidding if you are calling someone who objects to the conversion of his character to gay as a “motherf~~~ing pimp”. Or do you see that term as some kind of compliment?

    Furthermore, I am not responsible for you being offended by it, and will not change who I am because of who you are.

    #264370
    +2

    Anonymous
    24

    Wait a minute Joe. Tekai is on your side in not liking the fact that straight characters are now being portrayed as gay. You should be applauding him rather than calling him names.

    You are kidding? Right? Hard to tell sometimes…

    You must be kidding if you are calling someone who objects to the conversion of his character to gay as a “motherf~~~ing pimp”. Or do you see that term as some kind of compliment?

    After re-reading this a few times I see your error. I am not calling someone who objects to the conversion of his character to gay as a “motherf~~~ing pimp” I am using that term, a figure of speech, honoring him because it is HE who objected to the conversion of his character to gay in the new movie. You are very confused about the situation. Comment again when you have it figured out so I can respond properly to whatever problem you may have. If you are offended by the use of that figure of speech being used in a positive manner, I will once again say that is it not my responsibility to not offend you.

    #264380
    +1
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    I wish they would leave politics and social engineering out of entertainment.

    Exactly. Unfortunately a small group of like minded people own almost all relevant mainstream media and movie production.

    What do you expect big money making corporations like Hollywood studios to do? They are making movies that people want to see. Their only ideology is the bottom line. The real culprits are the public that makes these movies profitable. A sign of our sick society.

    This is the joke. The audience they are targeting don’t go to movie theaters. They download everything or stream it from the internet for free. They’re targeting their movies to customers who don’t pay. Case in point, Emma Watson’s Colony about a damsel rescuing a white knight in distress. $61 in the UK. They think they will make their money back from online viewing. Nope. These pc studios are going to tank.

    I already hear a lot of online grumbling about Marvel Studios, probably the most successful studio right now. Fans are upset about female Thor, black teenage female iron man, etc. and vowing to boycott. They’re going to lose paying customers because they think the loud mouths on the internet represent a majority. The loud mouths on the internet are typically people with no job and computer savvy. ie. they don’t pay for movies.

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #264403
    +1
    Big Boss
    Big Boss
    Participant
    4496

    Also, why the f~~~ does it matter who he is f~~~ing as long as he can steer the ship.

    No one gave a f~~~ till they announced it like it f~~~ing mattered. No one cared who Sulu was f~~~ing.

    #264567
    +1
    Cap285
    Cap285
    Participant
    6007

    Been a fan since I was 4, but, goodbye Star Trek.

    I loved the original Star Trek as a kid, but I haven’t even seen the new movies because I knew all the new movies had SJW bulls~~~ in them.

    They’ve done the same s~~~ with GhostCunsters and Mad Furiosa. They’re f~~~ing up great franchises in the name of SJW bulls~~~.

    TOS brother. I started watching re-runs of it in 1976 with my dad. First episode I saw was Devil in the Dark. Spock mind melded with that Horta and I was hooked. I had that huge toy phaser they build around a flashlight. The 12″ figures, that big plastic bridge, etc.

    I mention Furiosa and Rey as well in my Fembusters rant in Blue Pill Hell I think.

    Fuck this planet.
    #264623
    Anthony
    Anthony
    Participant
    2281

    started watching re-runs of it in 1976 with my dad. First episode I saw was Devil in the Dark. Spock mind melded with that Horta and I was hooked.

    I don’t remember the first episode I watched, but I loved the way they portrayed the ship as well as the other technology in the show. That got me hooked as a kid. I was also really into everything sci-fi related back then.

    Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 20 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.