"GENDER INCLUSIVE" LANGUAGE

[MGTOWhomoParticipant 111]

Hey guys. It’s been a while since I’ve posted anything(lots of personal stuff going on), but I have been popping in to read the forums and trying to stay abreast of everything.

I have a question: do any of you guys get upset seeing this “gender inclusive” language all the time? Expressions like “s/he said” or “he/she,” and so on. I just read something today written by a friend of mine – in a profession where such diction is more or less required – and I simply couldn’t take it. I found it difficult to read, as if it were a kind of “fractional feminism” or “fractional misandry”. I grew up during the age when “he” simply was understood in certain contexts to mean any human person, male or female. Now it’s a form of expression designed to show that one’s “consciousness” has been “raised” and that one is “sensitive.” As far as I’m concerned, this is really not just a war on men through the use of language (hence the reduction of sex to gender), it’s really a disguised war on freedom of speech and expression. I’ve made a deliberate resolution never to use gender inclusive language and to stick to the old usage; I say “mankind” rather than “humankind” because it p~~~es off the feminazis and betas.  But anyway, does anyone else out there notice this, and have any of you noticed that men who buy into this type of social engineering via “gender inclusive” language tend to be betas?

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

I used to use “he/she” I was more of a purple pill man.  I honestly don’t see beta and alpha.  I see blue pill, purple pill and red pill men.  I no longer use she/he said crap because I don’t give a f~~~.  I don’t care about politically correctness because people are trying to change your own views.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[MGTOWhomoParticipant 111]

Hear hear!  I never used it and refused to start. It’s just another part of the war on men. But I still wonder if anyone else has noticed any correlation between those who do use it and those who stay in the matrix.  I guess my real point here is, I think it’s time for MGTOW to deliberately go after this gender inclusive crap and stick to the use of the masculine pars pro toto and “mankind” rather than “humankind.” The language manipulation is part of their social engineering scheme, and we need to avoid it.

[MGTOWhomoParticipant 111]

RULE: Women that play this card, exclude them from EVERYTHING.

I’m at the point of excluding from my intimate circle anyone who falls for this linguistic misandry, man or women. I don’t have many women friends in my close circle of friends at all. But I increasingly find myself at loggerheads with most men who’ve bought into this nonsense and won’t fight it. What it is being used for is a “litmus test” to see if one is “on board” with the social engineering agenda behind it. Oppose it or refuse to use it, and your job, in certain circumstances, is at risk, and hence, it’s a subtle war on freedom of speech and expression. And feminism was behind it, we need to remember that.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

MGTOWhomo wrote:

I’ve made a deliberate resolution never to use gender inclusive language and to stick to the old usage; I say “mankind” rather than “humankind” because it p~~~es off the feminazis and betas.

George Carlin did a great piece on “soft language”. Its’ in the archives.

Having to do with “gay pride day” I just saw a picture on Twitter a few days ago: “This as-yet gender-unidentified 7 year old” and that’s when I knew the insanity is off the charts. It was clearly a 7 year old BOY…. but these f~~~ing freaks called him “gender-unidentified”. Holy f~~~ing hell for even THINKING like that.

it’s not “gender-unidentified”.. its a BOY.

• It’s not “gender” it’s SEX – as in: “the male SEX” and “the female SEX”.
• It’s not bathroom tissue.. it’s toilet paper.
• It’s not “landfill”…. it’s garbage dump.
• It’s not “I don’t believe in marriage”…. its’ “I refuse to sign a marriage contract”.

The whole SJW “gender” s~~~ is soft language for s~~~stains who have such delicate sensibilities they can’t even say what something ACTUALLY IS without freaking out. They are nucking futs.

/video/life-through-the-eyes-of-a-sjw/

That is why using plain lingo like “MAN” instead of “guy” actually makes them a little nervous and uncomfortable. Use the direct language and their tiny fragile brains will explode. Directness truth and honesty with no apology is the equivalent of dropping a bomb on them. Enjoy the s~~~ out of it.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MGTOWhomoParticipant 111]

Keymaster wrote:

it’s not “gender-unidentified”.. its a BOY. • It’s not “gender” it’s SEX – as in: “the male SEX” and “the female SEX”. • It’s not bathroom tissue.. it’s toilet paper. • It’s not “landfill”…. it’s garbage dump. • It’s not “I don’t believe in marriage”…. its’ “I refuse to sign a marriage contract”.

 

Hear hear!  This is the other insidious side of this whole linguistic-social engineering agenda, in that they have to rob children of their innocence by sexualizing them at an early age, and by equating “gender”(a linguistic characteristic) with “sex”, they deliberately sow confusion in children’s minds. Here’s another thing that bothers me that the feminists don’t complain about, which shows what a double standard reigns in all of this. Do a search on a famous actress (feminine gender of the word “actor”) and oftentimes you will see an actress labeled as “A British/American/Canadian actor”. So, they use the masculine gender to refer to a fully mature female actress, yet insist on the “gender inclusive” form for pronouns and pars pro toto usage. Goal? I suppose that it’s all to break down sexual roles and distinctions, to create the fiction of real “equality” when it does not exist by the linguistic sleight of hand of a “linguistic” equality. And it’s handy, as I said, as a litmus test of whether or not you’re on board with their agenda. I say we have to consciously and deliberately fight it.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

The cultural Marxist are already f~~~ed up society around the world.  Gender neutral language is used all over the world.

 

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2012/04/linguistic-social-engineering/

 

Holy s~~~ people raising children as gender neutral.  I didn’t even know this is happening.

 

 

 

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[Anonymous 12]

It’s all getting a little much I agree. Can’t say anything anymore especially if you are a White, Heterosexual, Christian Male.

[Elgos_GrimParticipant 254]

I’ve noticed this for years, even long before I knew what MGTOW was and it always p~~~ed me off to no end. Everytime I complained about it to someone they always responded with something like “but women need to be represented”, which they always were, as terms like “Köche” always included women, I thought, until it bekame “Köche/innen” (german for chef). This kind of thing is very common in germany at the moment.

I honestly think it just goes to show how fragile and pathetic women are nowadays.

[RoyDalParticipant]

A liberal couple I know tried to raise their son as gender neutral. It didn’t work. He had all the male tendencies toward hyperactivity, mock violence, and so on. He picked up sticks and shouted, “bang! bang! Things like that.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[MGTOWhomoParticipant 111]

Dressing kids up this way is disgusting… sick. We need to fight this nonsense. And @ Morlock, believe it or not, I agree.  If one has any sort of traditional religious convictions, that has to bow down and make way for everyone else (including “gays”), which is nauseating.  It’s the same in the “gay movement,” if you don’t agree with their radical agenda then they attack you.

[MGTOWhomoParticipant 111]

I love the cartoon

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

Crazy Canuck wrote:

Holy s~~~ people raising children as gender neutral.  I didn’t even know this is happening.

Enjoy seeing the mental illness rates and suicides amongst these kids in 20 year’s time.

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

The irony of the PC language, and it’s relationship to beta males, is that it is a self feeding cycle.  It both creates, and then castrates the betas.

One has to have compassion for the men stuck in the beta zone, they are not betas by choice, most of them were groomed from birth and then forced right into being controlled.

Sovereignty above all else.

[MadmanParticipant 772]

I am glad as s~~~ that I dont have any kids in todays f~~~ed up society.

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

I’ve been seeing “xe” for “he/she” and “xr” for “Mr./Ms.”  It annoys the drek out of me!  It sounds so haughty.

[cicer0Participant 46]

My dad used to be in charge of stores for the Australian Army back in the ’70’s.

Anyway, for some strange reason, the army back then would issue sanitary products to women when that time arose. My father being the perfect gentleman that he is, was working at his desk when this young lady came into the store and wanted some pads.

But rather than come out with it, she went “the nervous teenager at the pharmacy the first time buying condoms” route. You know all ums and no eye contact… that kind of s~~~.

Dad, being the patient man he is, lost his temper.

“For christs’ sake girl… What do you want? Man hole covers? Ask for them for f~~~s sake!”

If he said that today, he’d be a eunuch.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

With Jenners in the world, and the confusing of names, I may not know what sex a person is, so going gender neutral, I still can say they are a human being, even if their gender is confusing.

I also will usually say gender, because I have sex, as the biological act

Anyhow, those are my biases.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

Its really just the way it is. I dont worry about it or even think about it that much. Saying he/she is way better than it just saying she.

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Well. I’m just an old f~~~.

If you have the anatomy of a specific gender that what I calls it. If someone dresses like a man acts like a man, wants to be treated and identified as a man, then I’ll call it a man and hold it to the same standard. Same for any type of woman. The caveat here though is you cant have everything, pick one or the other and accept the whole bag of being what gender you want, not just the good parts.

But, that’s just my 2 cents

 

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Author]

Posts