Gawker: Ban Men from Literary Readings

[HammerdownParticipant 528]

http://review.gawker.com/ban-men-from-literary-readings-1700491985

It’s like they’re not even trying anymore.

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

Lol ok, they can refuse all men in literary meetings if they want, but only if they talk only about books written by women, and we’ll see how far they go.

By the way, as a literature enthusiast, I know these “chicks who read a lot”. Most of them read corny s~~~, have no feeling/talent or sensitivity to written art. They just read blindly, often not getting the subtleties of the author, not grasping the messages to their fullest extents. They read books like you’d listen to music in the subway, not paying attention, just having it to somewhat occupy your mind, personally I see it as an insult to the author, when someones spends hours and hours doing something, you could at least make an effort to delve into it….
But well, I might be biased, people have been telling I’m good at writing since I’m 10 years old.

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Well, considering how Feminist literature develops and all this social theory and such, it’s all interdependent and has grown greatly. They can be pretty entertained for a while. It’s not that it won’t last long, because it will… it’ll just become more creepier.

This seems to be an expression where they say it’s one thing but it’s really another. There’s another reason they don’t want men there, and it’s possibly because they want the freedom to go on diatribes, or they fear exposure, or perhaps they don’t want men to see them for who they are.

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

peterfa wrote:

Well, considering how Feminist literature develops and all this social theory and such, it’s all interdependent and has grown greatly. They can be pretty entertained for a while. It’s not that it won’t last long, because it will… it’ll just become more creepier.

I’m talking about really talented people like Nabokov, Camus, Sartre, DH Lawrence, WH Auden and the likes. If they want to enjoy their feminist pseudo-literature written by frustrated c~~~s with no talent, they can. I’ll have fun looking at their pig meat marinating in a cesspool of self-victimizing mediocrity.

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[Anonymous 11]

Go figure.. My feminist ex is a huge Gawker fan. At least it wasn’t written by a mangina.

I only read History and Science related tomes so I would not be at one of her type of literary readings anyway. It sounded to me like someone got her ass handed to her by a white haired turtleneck and is peeved.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Dear Dumb C~~~s,

You don’t need to BAN us, we are already NOT F~~~ING INTERESTED.

Especially when THE BEST literary s~~~ women come up with is “harry Potter”, “Twilight” and “50 Shades of Rape”. …. and lest we forget “for guys. a guide to GIRL TALK“. Then of course there is the s~~~ Gawker/Jezebels pen: “Have you ever beat up your boyfriend? Because we have!” and “How to kick a man in the crotch”.

Women are s~~~ at communicating and using languages effectively, they actually feel a need to publish a f~~~ing MAN-ual on how to speak “girl talk”….. where nothing they say is sincere and needs to be reinterpreted and explained in multiple paragraphs. Men just need to say “NO”. But women say “no” and then go on in multiple paragraphs about how ” no doesn’t actually mean no… it means I might do anal tonight if you spend enough money on my whore ass”.

That’s a woman being “literary”.

Stop flattering yourselves. It makes you look even MORE stupid.

Sincerely,

Men

---

Folks, you simply cannot make up the utter lack of awareness and pathological solipsism exhibited by today’s modern Western woman. It’s like if you threw her into solitary confinement, she would claim the world was banging on the cage door to get in and join her . When don’t even have any interest, she will pretend she is “banning” and “rejecting” you.

You want to know who the new CULTURAL WRITER for GQ Magazine is??
Sit down before you fall down: Obese feminist Gawker/Jezebel Lindy West.

This is the kind of literary s~~~ you can expect to read from her.

••••

All literary men would think:
“Looks like s~~~. Smells like s~~~. Boy, Im glad I didn’t step in it.”

But a Gawker author c~~~ points a camera at her fat ass and says:
“Looks like s~~~. Smells like s~~~. I think I’ll eat it!!”…..while thinking you’ll be interested in her review.

THIS IS WHAT A GAWKER FEMINIST THINKS LIKE.

Ban that fat bitch from youtube.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 11]

They must really suck not to be eaten by her.

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

By the way I find it funny how most of literary blogs on youtube are made by females. Reminds me of a guy who said (don’t remember who) “Those who can play music become musicians, those who can’t play become music critics”. I find this quote so true it feels like bliss when reading it.
Not to say that the commentary is often very well thought-out (not), it is often limited to “I like/I don’t like” , no examples of the prose that would be an example of the wonderful writing style of the author. It’s like they cruise through the books without really READING the damn thing. When you actually pay attention to what a great author says, some parts HAVE to make you stop and go “wow”, just like when listening to an awesome guitar solo, and you play it ten times in a row just because of how awesome it is.
A short example, in his book “La peste” (the plague),Camus,  in the very beginning, describes the town where the story unfolds, he basically describes it as a boring town where habits prevail more than anything else ( you know, like one of these province cities where nothing ever really happens, and life seems to flow pretty blandly, people just go to work, come back home and that’s about it ). And he says that because the weather and the inhabitants were so constant and uniform, the only way you could have guessed summer was coming is that merchants started selling flowers. He thus says something that roughly translates to “Summer was being sold on the marketplace.”
May seem like a simple sentence, but I stopped and thought for 10 good minutes about it, and the more I thought about it, the more it made sense.
And THAT is real talent, not “boo hoo men are bad, now I’m gonna write a s~~~ty book to vent off the frustration”

Just my 2cents…

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Feeling some need to “Ban” men from their s~~~ty literary meetings is just like when 10,000 of the fugliest bitches on Earth pretend that anyone is interesting in “raping” them.

We don’t want women here either.
But we don’t say (or yell) “no women allowed”. It’s just — “MEN ONLY”.
We do it that way ON PURPOSE.

Just because women turn into a screaming complaining mess and become furious when men totally ignore them or don’t want them around …. doesn’t mean “banning men” from a roomful of t~~~ is devastating.

When a woman walks into a room full of men, tell her nobody wants her there and watch what happens.
Even if it’s the men’s bathroom, bitch will refuse to leave.

When a man walks into a room full of women who don’t want him there….
he is not remotely interested in sticking around.

“I BAN YOU FROM GAWKER LITERARY MEETINGS!!!!!!”

Lol please. My world is shattered. How ever will I survive?
Gawker advertizers have been dropping Gawker and banning them from doing business for a while now.

Everybody already knows why.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[HammerdownParticipant 528]

Her main grievance behind wanting to ban men is a bunch of them asked (in her mind) inane or offtopic questions while she waited to ask hers. So for the horrible crime of a minor annoyance and you know, everyday discussions in society, she wants to ban half the population.

No real surprise, coming from the sex who throws your XBOX out the window because she THINKS you’re not paying enough attention to her.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Hammerdown wrote:

No real surprise, coming from the sex who throws your XBOX out the window because she THINKS you’re not paying enough attention to her.

And there it is.

Stop paying attention to her…
and she will deliberately seek your attention…..
just to pretend she’s not paying attention to you.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

Gawker got a bloody nose from GamerGate but the stupid c~~~s(and manginas) dont know when to quit.Damn.

 

Stupid is as stupid does

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

Hammerdown wrote:

Her main grievance behind wanting to ban men is a bunch of them asked (in her mind) inane or offtopic questions while she waited to ask hers. So for the horrible crime of a minor annoyance and you know, everyday discussions in society, she wants to ban half the population. No real surprise, coming from the sex who throws your XBOX out the window because she THINKS you’re not paying enough attention to her.

She thinks men tend to go off topic and tend to talk about their “credentials” too much (aka what they read). I guess the men making links between different books p~~~es them off, since they’re unable to connect 2 brain cells to follow said links.

From what I remember of high school, girls don’t get s~~~ about literature, sure some of them do, but the vast majority tend to stick with the literal meaning of things, anything more abstract, written ” between the lines” just seems to make their brains melt…..

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[HammerdownParticipant 528]

I wonder how many feminists will be jumping out of the woodwork to tell us she’s “not a real feminist”.

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

Hammerdown wrote:

I wonder how many feminists will be jumping out of the woodwork to tell us she’s “not a real feminist”.

Haha, surely a lot. These “real feminists” seem to be the modern unicorns, a lot of people talk about them, but nobody ever saw one!

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Well the dictionary definition of feminist is the strive for gender equality. That basically makes all of use MGTOWs, but not many branded feminists are real feminists.

I had no idea GQ was written by a feminist. I bought that magazine once thinking I was going to learn how to dress better but the whole magazine was lame, off-topic, and talked about crap. So, I didn’t buy another. There doesn’t seem to be any good male magazines (then again, there doesn’t seem to be any magazines for either gender).

They should just call themselves Squawker Media. It even sounds better.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Mango Ingaway wrote:

Reminds me of a guy who said (don’t remember who) “Those who can play music become musicians, those who can’t play become music critics”

I believe it was Woody Allen who said:

“Those who can’t “do”… teach.
And those who can’t teach… teach gym.”

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I only went to those things because some goddamn professor threatened me if I didn’t.

Now it’s time to air my dirty laundry. I like Jane Austen. I’ve said it and I’m glad! So there!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Author]

Posts