Fukushima Radiation Levels On The Rise

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Also stop using word like flamed. Someone having a different opinion to you is not abuse.

You seem to buy into the SJW mainstream garbage.

support for the concerns of ordinary people. = Populism.

Seems to have been demonised by the media doesn’t it.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Anonymous 42]

blade wrote:

You guys are just looking at this from a negative stand point .

To the kids of the future 2 heads are better than one .

Hey blade, I told the radiation to kill any cancer and leave the rest of me alone, ya think the the atomic decay will obey me? or am a just another radiated guinea pig?

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

^^^^^ ughhh ^^^^^^

We truly are a virus upon this planet.

Is there going to be anything that we have not f~~~ed up left, before we go extinct?

[Anonymous 42]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Is there going to be anything that we have not f~~~ed up left, before we go extinct?

Nope!

[bladeParticipant]

That dog in the middle pic i could twist a face like that with my fist to those nice little friends in society . Thanks for the idea tower i will add that to my panel beating criteria

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Anonymous 24]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Just ordered a superb radiation detector. I live on the coast. Gonna be interesting. Can’t wait to use it at the Whole Foods fish counter.

Dude, let me know how that goes if you are on the west coast.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Roger

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[Anonymous 24]

economist wrote:

Not trying to be hostile here, but there’s a reason this theory isn’t being carried in the mainstream media. Do you really think people who make money by scaring their viewers would participate in a conspiracy to cover this up?

Well, once you realize that the people who produce hardware for nuclear power plants and bombs for wars are the same ones who own the mainstream media outlets, then you will be getting somewhere. In this case GE who owns MSNBC are the largest producers of nuclear hardware and bombs therefore they do not covering things like nuclear meltdowns and certainly are not going in depth as to what has/is going on in the Mid East. Not sure wherein lies the “conspiracy theory” when it is all right there to see for anyone who takes the time to do a little research, making it conspiracy fact.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

I don’t trust anything. That’s why I bought 2 k worth of gear, and have a distant, if not well embedded education on nuclear chemistry. Will be hard to tell though, not like you will observe 5k disintegrations per min. Low level gamma or even ingested alpha can have bad effects. I’m just tying it to the massive die offs all over the pacific and the fact that I talked to a buddy at the Salk institute and he told me they are not “authorized” to take non official radiation measurements.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[economistParticipant 225]

@MG-Tower I appreciate that video, i hadn’t seen it before.

@@ngelo(DOES) (i’m not sure if it will quote your name properly)
accusing me of being willfully ignorant or being a shill is not the best way to convince me of your point. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof”.
At this point I will wait for more evidence to be presented, as one of the gentleman above us stated he’s buying a geiger counter to test radiation levels for himself.

I believe in a lot of false flags and government cover-ups that others would consider ludicrous so I understand why you might be frustrated that I am not convinced, in the same way I am frustrated that people believe that a person named Adam Lanza killed children in Sandy Hook. However that was an event for which I have seen proof that i consider to be credible.

When Fukushima first occurred we all saw that picture showing a scary red plume of radiation spreading across the ocean, however it was quickly revealed that that picture showed a truly microscopic change in background radiation levels. In my mind, that is not convincing, and many of the videos which I have watched (do not think i haven’t spent some time researching this event, admittedly more so in 2013-2014 when i had more free time for this sort of thing) seemed to be people who were perhaps a bit less than critical in their interpretation of events. For example, if the amount of radioisotopes produced were really as great as many would claim, they would not have evenly distributed across the oceans. The currents simply do not work that way. There would be hot spots of incredible magnitude, and as of this time none of those have been found.

MG-Towers video is concerning to me. That is a lot of radiation, however Ottawa is nearer the eastern seaboard, far, far away from Japan. It is also a heavily industrialized city, where any number of toxic chemicals could be released into the sky and be falling in the rain. If 1,500mSv of radiation are falling in rain in Ottawa, why isn’t the rain in the Pacific Northwest was i was born and lived up until a few months ago causing severe radiation burns?

I think we will have to agree to disagree on this one. I hope i’m right, but if i’m proven wrong i will be the first one to admit it. Probably while typing with the third arm that sprouts from my chest. I will however take some time to read up more on this subject so that i can assure myself i’m well enough to have a debate on the topic. I owe you that much at least. Like i said, it’s been a couple years.

For the rest of you, i will say: Correlation does not equal causation. What would a company like GE stand to gain from poisoning the world with radiation? What would anyone stand to cover up a thing like this instead of informing the world so that the massive resources of multiple nations working together couldn’t attempt to find a solution to the problem? Even global elites stand to lose if they die of radiation poisoning.

[chirParticipant]

economist wrote:

For the rest of you, i will say: Correlation does not equal causation. What would a company like GE stand to gain from poisoning the world with radiation? What would anyone stand to cover up a thing like this instead of informing the world so that the massive resources of multiple nations working together couldn’t attempt to find a solution to the problem? Even global elites stand to lose if they die of radiation poisoning.

Why would they cover it up? Are you that naive? Two reasons. 1) avoidance of responsibility 2) MONEY.
If any nation, company or agency EVER admitted that there was ANY mistake in design or implementation of the reactors they would open themselves up lawsuits by nations or from individuals. Not. Going. To. Happen.
Why should nations work together when they can ignore it. Its cheaper to ignore it and roll out shill scientists to say all is fine, go back to sleep. The elites are more worried about losing money and they have the money to take care of themselves or to move to unaffected regions. Why do you think so many hyper-wealthy are making bolt hole homes in New Zealand.
WE will not die of radiation poisoning. There will be a higher incidence of thyroid cancer in children and more cancers on the west cost the closer you live to the pacific. The long term damage will be to the die off in the pacific. Oh the pacific will recover, but we will see crashing fish stocks, extinction of some species and starvation and hunger around countries dependent on the sea for food. In a few hundred years the Ocean will encapsulate the radioactive particles and life will rebound.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[Author]

Posts