Fresh article on us by VICE (Mack Lamoureux)

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Came across this article “This Group of Straight Men Is Swearing Off Women”
http://www.vice.com/read/inside-the-global-collective-of-straight-male-separatists

The author claims he interviewed someone named Oz – founder of this website – and was quoting him, MG-ɹǝʍo┴, Megachris% and rorick

There was also this picture:

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[DDJParticipant 1880]

Seems Legit…

Every woman is a slut, if you catch her on the right day.

[Anonymous 1]

I was not mentioned. I’m triggered.

😀

By the way: thanks for the post! I read the article and I will take my time to dismantle a few things it says when I get home, just for the fun of it. I just don’t have time right now.

Cheers.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Who’s the guy in the picture I wonder
Any guesses?

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[GrumpyParticipant]

BAHAHAHAHA

It’s about Edmonton AB, most of these morons voted NDP. That in itself disqualifies most of the population here as intelligent. As soon as I can manage it, I am out of this s~~~ hole. Love the shaming action from the “reporter” and some of the commentators. All a person has to do is watch other people to see the truth about women, and society in general.
Mack… if you’re lurking here. Thanks for the exposure. What happens, happens for a reason. Try not to ignore that. Have a great day

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Swen AugustParticipant 373]

I was going to suggest reading the comments from wimmin, but there is no need because they are always the same- venomous hatred and childish name calling. Every reason for a man to get married has been eradicated, and they can’t stand to see men being happy and honest. I notice when they discuss sex they always seem to leave off one important reason to abstain- STD’s. My Adulterous ex gave me an incurable STD and unlike her I will never give an incurable STD to any one. I will never have sex with another person ever again. And besides all that since I have remained single I have money in my pocket.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

No surprise of ALL the possible image representations of a “MGHOW” ….the poster boy chosen to accompany the article is a lipstick(?) and garbage bag wearing overweight picketer / gladiator(?) ….. who isn’t even “going his own way”. Because who would ever write an article criticizing “mgtow” and put up a poster image of these guys? – our actual members.

It’s GOTTA be the BIGGEST stand-out freak they can find.
“PERFECT. Get a picture of that MGTOW in the garbage bag Mack!!! AWESOME!!!”

On the whole the article is peppered with a nice share of bias but we’ve seen worse.

“Their success and failures with women……” is a term MGTOW can’t help but snicker at – because a man can celebrate “success with women” just by making sure he never hooks up with the WRONG one. So “success and failure with women” is hardly an accurate unit of measure. After all I am “successful” at Russian Roulette when I pull the trigger and DON’T die. I’m a winner by not even playing at all! That’s what “success with women” actually means now.

“Success and failures with women” should really be a forbidden term and never even spoken – or implied.

Otherwise generally neutral, the last paragraphs had to be thrown in to get the female thumbs up. But it really got funny when they forgot to include a photo of Matt Forney calling MGTOW “sexually repellent losers”.

Clearly being “sexually repellent” is not exclusive to MGTOW. It’s a wonder they still try to get away with it. I can put a dime in a female and get her to agree to pose with my arm around her shoulder at Mount Rushmore too. No woman would lay eyes on MGHOW LuisMarco and say “OMG that guy is SO sexually repellent”

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RennieParticipant]

Looks like you’ve become a jukebox hero MGTower.

Apparently MGTOW isn’t glamorous either, but it is, since it’s a way better life than putting up with t~~~’s

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Could that guy in a picture be an intentional setup shot made to discredit?

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Anonymous 1]

All Hail Mg-tower!

\o/

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Russky wrote:

Could that guy in a picture be an intentional setup shot made to discredit?

Of course! That’s why the poster face of feminism is never JabbaTheHutt Andrea Dworkin (don’t google her photo unless you want to turn into a pillar of stone)…….. or face-like-a-weathered-baseball-glove Germaine Greer…. it’s gotta be a young & attractive “actress” Emma Watson – who also happens to be the face of Lancome cosmetics. Who would ever let a hideous beast speak on behalf of women at the United Nations?

George Clooney was a face of MGTOW until he done f~~~ed up and signed a marriage contract last year, and even though they perfectly cast George in the film “Up in the Air”, it’s going to have to be GarbageBagGladiatorBoy for the time being.

…. because the REAL face of MGTOW is an empty chair.
They can’t afford to publish that.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Found the video where the snapshot of “TrashBagDave” was taken from (FF to 3:15)

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[KeymasterKeymaster]

He crashed a SLUTWALK?? LOL that’s PERFECT.

Then what he was wearing was totally respectable – considering what the sluts were wearing. At least he had the class and decency to cover himself up. Compared that s~~~, he’s wearing a black tie and tails.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[GrumpyParticipant]

I find it remarkable and hypocritical that after decades of “INSERT SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP HERE” acceptance being forced down everyone’s throats, and enacting “hate crime” laws to enforce that acceptance, that people refuse to be accepting of a man pursuing his own happiness and goals.
If everyone else can apparently be accepted for doing their own thing, why is it unacceptable for me to do mine without attempted shaming and ridicule?

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Grumpy wrote:

If everyone else can apparently be accepted for doing their own thing, why is it unacceptable for me to do mine without attempted shaming and ridicule?

Because your mere non-presence and the non-presence of 100K or 500K like you would begin to unravel the very fabric of society. It’s a like a sweater. Pull ONE wrong thread and the whole thing falls apart. Remember that garbage strike in the UK where the streets stank like yesterday’s diapers? Women didn’t take it to the dump. It just sat there and stank for WEEKS. The male refusal to take away the refuse was all it took start chaos.

You “happily going your own way” is not on the f~~~ing agenda.

You know the chaos you see when ONE street lamp at an intersection goes out?
Now imagine 10,000. Now imagine the men they call to fix it saying “No. fix it yourself.”

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

That was such weak criticism that it can’t help but send a couple new menbers this way. It basically read, “these guys are wrong, but if you’ve been done wrong by an ex or you just don’t feel like putting up with crap anymore there’s this place you can go.” I get that it was a shaming effort and designed to mock (weakly), since I’ve already been around for half a year I just laughed at the things he got wrong and nodded at the few things he got right. KM if the site keeps getting call outs we’ll hit 15K before year’s end.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Ogre wrote:

That was such weak criticism

I don’t believe it was really meant as a harsh criticism — more like a story on MGTOW. Compared to others , this was tame.

The author was very cordial and enthusiastic about speaking to us. If it was intended to be a fist in a velvet glove, he hid it very well. He and MGTOW.COM enjoyed a pleasant exchange. Although some bias is evident, he didn’t misquote and remained generally true to our requests to not bend words. He had some misconceptions and was very grateful for the way we put it. “MGTOW fight fire with water” was his favorite. He took an extended pause to write that down ….. and hadn’t previously (or carefully) considered the distinct difference between MRA and MGTOW being one of “action” vs. “inaction”. He actually exclaimed at least once “you know I hadn’t thought of it that way. Thank you.” which is at the very least equitable.

One example…..

He spoke about “the MGTOW.COM Women’s Shelter” (as a way of saying “for men only – no girls allowed” ) and eluded “you know that’s pretty harsh and dismissive and rude”. He had to be reminded it wasn’t harsh, dismissive or rude at all. The message is not “NO WOMEN ALLOWED!!!”. It’s for “men only” and we don’t hang a sign on the door of a cartoon female in a skirt with a big red X through her. Big difference. It’s actually funny, cute, COURTEOUS and extremely polite. If anyone is “offended” by that….. then it’s ENTIRELY in their imagination. We’re not flipping them the bird and sending them to a gallery of pictures of dog feces. After we put it to him like that, he agreed, withdrew and went on to the next question.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

Now imagine 10,000. Now imagine the men they call to fix it saying “No. fix it yourself.”

Well now, that would be a good start in my book. I believe there are enough critters around to “fix” things for the other lazy and inept critters. Then again who am I to judge.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[OgreParticipant 5863]

It may be that I sensed his personal feelings as the criticism. My BS meter never pegged the red at least, but I took the overall tone as one of mild condescension. That’s the great thing about free will, if you use it there is a whole spectrum of ways that you can feel. Pulling the yoke and feeling the whip your feelings and “choices” don’t matter anyway, so why have them. Thanks for the feedback about how cordial he was, I may have to re-read without my filter and deflector shields up.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Ogre wrote:

I took the overall tone as one of mild condescension. Thanks for the feedback about how cordial he was, I may have to re-read without my filter and deflector shields up.

No you read it right. There is mild condescension in there. No doubt about it.
But the personal interaction was kinder to us than the article. We’re just being a little nicer about it.

Notice the prominence and attention brought to the use of the word “wench” – quoting MegaChris. Well I just did a forum search for the word , and it appears 57 times out of 100,000+ posts. And many of them are re-quoting the original use of the word. Now when you’re zeroing in on a reference to “women” referred to as “wenches” and you find it is used 0.000057% of the time…. how THE F~~~ is that a problem????

It’s clear he reads the forums, so everyone smile and wave hello!

• Use of “women” when speaking about women: 28550 posts

• Use of “bitch” when speaking about women: 5864 posts
(not a problem because WOMEN use that word to describe themselves proudly)

• Use of “slut” when speaking about women: 1290
(including use of the term “slutwalk” used by feminsts)

• Use of “wench” when speaking about women: 57 posts (including requotes)

75% of the time (or 300% more often) MGTOW use the term “women” when speaking about —– “women”.
That’s the whopping majority. And someone writes an article highlighting the use of the word “wench”??????

There’s your bias.

••••••••

Now, what if the grapes REALLY ARE sour.
What if a “woman” is REALLY a “wench”?
What if a “woman” is REALLY a “bitch”?
What if a “woman” is REALLY a “slut” and holds a sign above her head while marching nearly naked down the street after inking herself with the word?

It’s really not significant AT ALL.

Bringing attention to the use of the word “wench” to describe a “wench” means the problem is not with MGTOW.
The problem is ……. the WENCH.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts