FOUND THIS IN THE DIVORCE LAWS FOR MY STATE…TOO FUNNY!

[Truthseeker82Participant 6406]

So I was digging through the divorce laws for my area of the United States and I came across one of the “grounds” for divorce that you know was written by a woman or mangina. This year, by the way, this state went completely no fault – so these are pre 2016 but still worth a laugh. So now even if a woman cheats on you with 1000 Chad T’s, it’s not her fault. Anyway, the old law says that the relationship was considered consummated if the couple had sex once. That’s it. You heard it right. Just once. So if Cinderella put out on your wedding night – and then never let you touch her again – she fulfilled her obligation as a wife! And if you tried to file for divorce and avoid being financially neutered on those grounds, you had nothing to stand on. This is more and more the reason why men are running for the hills from women, marriage, society as a whole. What imbecile could have possibly written into law of a major state in the US or any country a provision that stipulates a spouse has an obligation to only consummate the marriage once! Happy Friday Gents!

[RoyDalParticipant]

Think of all the nice things a man can buy for the price of a wedding. Heap on the cost of being married and then divorced, and it makes sense to run from marriage as fast and far as he can.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Are you in a red or a blue state? because that sounds similar to the bible in terms of any sexual contact will cause a permanent bond meaning you are married to the first person you have sex with.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

How about as companion legislation to “no fault” divorce, we also have “no undue gain” divorce to go with it. It could read like this:

Parties shall not be entitled to undue financial reward unless directly earn from outside activities by the party, and also applies to assets owned by either party pre-marriage. Work done within the household, in support of the household shall not be considered for compensation and is presumed freely given in the cause of furtherance of domestic tranquility. Exception being if said work was done in furtherance of outside business interests.

Any Lawyer/legislator types here that could vet that? WE could call it the “Making Marriage Fair” act.

Make no mistake, as the population continues to shift towards singles, there will be an outcry to “save marriage.” Sooner or later people WILL start to figure out what all of us here already have: Our current “system” of marriage is a bonanza jackpot waiting for any wife who chooses to pull that trigger, and with zero consequences.

Whether they like it or not, they will be faced with a simple choice: Let marriage wither and die, or acknowledge that it’s a completely lopsided arrangement that as a general rule is extremely detrimental to men’s well being in general.

Now that we’ve crossed the threshold of single people majority, it’s obvious that many/most men have figured this out and are acting accordingly, whether they choose to call themselves MGTOW or not.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22557]

RoyDal wrote:

Think of all the nice things a man can buy for the price of a wedding.

That is a long list.

There was once a time when the bride’s family was expected to pay for the wedding. Now, the man is expected to pay for the wedding, and everything else.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

And don’t forget. If she get pregnant by Chad while you are legally married, it is yours financially.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

I would be surprised if marriage survives long term. Instead, I suspect women will attempt to fleece men with co-habitation laws.
“I slept with you once, therefore I am entitled to half of your assets.”

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22557]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

“I slept with you once, therefore I am entitled to half of your assets.”

It is almost to that point. Once it is, say goodbye to relationships. And it will cause a complete crash of civilization.

[Anonymous 11]

Truthseeker82 wrote:

So now even if a woman cheats on you with 1000 Chad T’s, it’s not her fault.

Hey, it was Chad Thunderc~~~ so she couldn’t help herself her pit bull divorce attorney will argue 😉

That is really f~~~ed up. Another nail in the coffin of marriage is a good thing though. There truly is no equality before the law.

How does one ram inconvenient facts like this through a blue pill skull?

[BurgundyParticipant 1525]

Next after men stops living in cohabitation with women, having sex once with said women, entitles her to half your s~~~.

Just wait, the feminists are crazy enough for this.

[ALPHA MALE!Participant 29]

…sounds more like willful ignorance to me!…what a f~~~ing joke! I’m going fishing!

...I'm an Alpha Male, not a bitch!!!

[hmskl’dParticipant 6413]

RoyDal wrote:

Think of all the nice things a man can buy for the price of a wedding.

exactly .. that is so true

[Author]

Posts