Found a nice blog post of mgtow men policing other men on women.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Anthony wrote:

Especially among really poor women who keep popping out welfare babies to get more welfare checks with Chad Thunderc~~~s.

But that’s not what they’re hoping for. Popping out little welfare meal tickets for the taxpayer to support is just their day job.

What they’re really hoping for is for one of those Chads to wife them up and then have Chad’s rich uncle die so they can divorce for the inheritance. Please note that their hopes don’t have to be in any way realistic.

Anthony wrote:

I agree that they do turn extremely nasty if they’re still single by 45-55.

I’m not really qualified to talk about white welfare queens, not having any experience with them.

But I’m not surprised. AWALT. I always kind of assumed they turn nasty a few years later than black women, though I can’t say why.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

I’ve given a a lot of thought on this (alomst 3 days of thought) and I’ve finally decided to comment on this:

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

“Seriously, it’s almost on a daily basis we get multiple comments here from self-professed MGTOW whining about men who say icky things about women. Are these fools so conditioned to police their own speech for the benefit of women’s feeeelz that they can’t even recognize the freedom in an all male space such as MGTOW?

The women-feelz defenders aren’t women-feelz defenders at all. That is what’s this guy is mistaken about. These men hardly care about the women; in fact, when somebody says “I hate women”…. all these ‘women-defenders’ can see are “I hate..” and hate is what triggers them.

As much as you say you support it, hate will never lead to no good.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

If there are MGTOW who are angry, let them vent and say whatever the f~~~ they want about women. What’s it to you? Why should they fast track through the anger stage because you, being some supposed moral giant, can’t take it?

Again, nobody stopping anyone from saying what they want; they’re just debating. And again, its not the subject they’re worried about (women) but the channel (hatred).

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

Who are they hurting by saying what they want?

Themselves, and being the moral giants we are, we can’t see that happening.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

I’ll tell you not who they’re hurting but what they’re hurting…
They are hurting the latent blue pill, white knight, mangina pussy inside you. Deep down you still pay penance to the female.

Not penance to female, but penance to humanity. Wonder why criminals aren’t shot at sight? Why a death sentence takes more than two decades to be approved after thumbing down numerous claims by Human Rights Groups? Think again.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

Maybe MGTOW is your “strike” until you meet a unicorn. Maybe you tack yourself onto the MGTOW label because it’s en vogue. Who knows. It is evident, however, that these types cringe whenever negative words are spoken about women and I do not believe they have the best interests of those who say what they want at heart.

Oh yes we do.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

They would rather the speaker suppress his emotions to create a nice, light, fluffy, Care Bears environment for them to ease the transition from high heel sucking invertebrate to MGTOW.

Again, emotions don’t harm anyone. Blant rants won’t hurt anyone if its not directed at them.
But blant rants do not stay limited to being blant rants. They turn into action. Terrorism is the perfect example: why do you think terrorist groups like ISIS, Taiban, Al-Qaeda formed? That’s right. People never tried to ‘supress’ their emotions.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

This has the potential to cause more damage to the speaker but the accusers never had men’s interests in mind anyway. Oh no, we mustn’t hate women. No matter what they do and no matter what proportion of them do these things. We must never ever presume to hate women.

Again, its the ‘hate’ part that raises concern rather than the ‘woman’ part. As I said above, if you support hate, you’d be better off with real hate groups like the ISIS.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

Women are not above hate. There are only two things man has deemed unworthy of criticism, God and woman, and considering that God is mocked openly without consequence (keep your religious debates to yourself, I’m making a point) but women are off limits, it goes to show you the level of worship some men have over a being that eats, s~~~s, p~~~es and bloodies up a wad of cotton every month. No one, even God, is beyond being hated. Righteous indignation is perfectly acceptable, and if it helps men to paint all women with the same brush, it is within their rights to do so. Some of us don’t care enough to pick through all women to single out the supposed “good ones” in spite of the fact the female nature we discuss is based on biology and human evolution and is as inherent in females as white knightery is in males. The difference being, women have more incentive to be “like that” than they do to be otherwise. White knightery, on the other hand, can get men killed!

Men have worship even over something as insignificant as animals. So men will worship almost everything in life. Many men worship MGTOW too, don’t they? I know I do. So would he say the same thing about MGTOW too? I doubt so. The rest of the quote is correct.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

None of you supposed moral giants have a single claim over this individualistic philosophy so get your aspirations of leadership out of your f~~~ing insolent minds because it’s not going to happen. There is no MGTOW without discussion on toxic female behaviour and the risks involved with them. If you can’t take it, ignore it. Don’t attempt to police speech like some f~~~ing feminist s~~~bar who will suppress free speech if it hurts their feels because that’s exactly the impression you give when you complain.

First of all, there is no ‘aspiration of leadership’ in MGTOW, so I don’t have an idea of this guy’s stupidity that he has thoughts like that. we have said time and again that there is no ‘movement’, there is no ‘leader’.

As far as policing speech goes, and I speak for myself, I will not police speech as far as the theme is based on female toxicity; we need that.

But if you spew enough ‘hatred’ bulls~~~, don’t blame me if I crack your skull open with my club. Hatred always leads to negative action…. actions that hurts everyone, and emotional pain is the last on the hurt list.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

I do not presume to speak for all MGTOW and I don’t expect any or all MGTOW to agree with what I’m saying, but you bring your thought and speech policing over here to me and I’ll tear the p~~~ out of you. I don’t know about other MGTOW but I answer to no one on earth, therefore I am free to say whatever I want when I want about anything I want and no one is safe.

And I am free to DO whatever I want when I want to anything/anyone I want and no one is safe. <- Can he say this too?
Nothing wrong with saying; doesn’t hurt anybody….but ‘doing whatever I want’ is another way of saying you are a terrorist who won’t think twice about blowing someone’s brains out.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

Offence is subjective. I’ve never been offended by anything said to me or about me on the Internet even once and actually many times I laugh at such things. Why? Because I am secure enough in what I am, who I live for and who I answer to. You can easily tell how self-absorbed someone is by how easily offended they get and how personally they take things. And the fact you are offended for women at anything negatively spoken about them says volumes about your self worth.

Can’t argue with that. If you are going to measure my self worth based on how many people I can hurt, how many people I can kill, how many I can ‘dominate’, then yes, you are right. I don’t have any f~~~ing self-worth. Will not argue with that.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

This is a male space. The last truly free male space on the planet. The most pathetic person in the world is not just the females that invade male spaces but MEN who invade and police male spaces for them! You are hurting men by suppressing them, not helping them. Eat s~~~.

The most pathetic person is one who has zero empathy and do not care about the very place that feeds him and lets him s~~~ on it. Policing is very different from wisdom and enlightening. If I need to eat s~~~ so that I could prevent another Terrorist Group from ever coming into existence, bring me a hefty plate. Because you haven’t seen what terrorists can do. They don’t give a f~~~ about your whining about “give me my free male space”. There wil be no ‘space’ let alone ‘male space’ if ISIS conquers your country.

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give wrote:

Tl;Dr f~~~ every one of you weak ass MGTOW attempting to police thought and speech here.”

Tl;Dr I hope you enjoy your miserable hate-filled life. I’d rather be weak-ass than die 20 years before my time due to depression from senseless hatred.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[xlrsnbrgParticipant 1786]

Nice post, Varun. The path of MGTOW must not be defined by hate, as such men are still in shackles without even knowing it.

As for policing speech, Keymaster is the only one doing it. And he’s doing a great job kicking out all the feminist infiltrators and other trolls and nutjobs that try to make the site look bad.

A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)

[VarunParticipant 2981]

I don’t need to “play your game” to proclaim myself as a man going my own way.

I don’t need to ‘hate’ each and every creature that has hurt me; this way I can never live my life in peace. To attain peace, you need to let go of hatred. Yes, its difficult and at times, the rage just gets to you. But you always have a choice whether you want to live in its misery, or let go of it and find bliss.

There are many members who think otherwise; I just don’t subscribe to those ideas, sorry. You all have the right to say whatever you want, no policing. But there will be one less man being brainwashed by your statements.

Even though I didn’t need to, I’ve explained my viewpoint to the so-called leaders of MGTOW (Sandman, Bar-Bar, TFM and a few members over here) and all they’ve said is:

“As long as you’re not promoting gynocentrism, you’re fine.”

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Author]

Posts