Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › “Women only” Hillary event forced to admit men after poor turnout
This topic contains 33 replies, has 22 voices, and was last updated by J.D Silvernail 4 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
“Women only” Hillary event forced to admit men after poor turnout
Excerpt: ‘Hillary Clinton had trouble attracting high-powered women to a New York talk hosted by Silda Wall Spitzer two weeks before her campaign officially kicks off. Sources said that after ticket sales fizzled for an intimate, $2,700-per-person, “just for women” meeting on Monday, the event was thrown open to men at the 11th hour, and the deadline extended to buy tickets.
The old trout can’t seem to do anything right.
Sounds like she presidential material then 😃
Get ready lads … your first woman president …. we had one of them in the UK.
I feel for you all 😢
The arrogance is that men would buy. Does make sense though, that if her plans don’t work, she expects men to bail her out.
Sounds like she presidential material then
Get ready lads … your first woman president …. we had one of them in the UK. I feel for you all
After 8 years of GW Bush, I am not sure when the GOP will ever regain the White House. If the GOP has this mentality that the Democrats had running Kerry against Bush, they will be into a rude awakening. Rand Paul gets eaten alive by numerous of the other factions in the primaries. The establishment candidates get eaten alive by the Tea Party candidates, and the Tea Party candidates will get slaughtered in the general election (Tea Party is pariah among the general public and independents). So, very likely the Democrat wins by default in the end.
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
So, 125 seats, 50 women took her up and then when in desperation she opened it to men only 40 of those could be bothered, good start.
Sounds like she presidential material then
Get ready lads … your first woman president …. we had one of them in the UK.
I feel for you all
To be fair ours was pretty good, unlike Clinton she did actually understand how the world works.
Anonymous12Alienating 50% of the population is always a great move.
What idiots did buy anyways? Giving Hilary 2.5K is like winning your Mangina Badge.
What idiots did buy anyways? Giving Hilary 2.5K is like winning your Mangina Badge.
I see you supplied the answer with the question!
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
Giving Hilary 2.5K is like winning your Mangina Badge.
Supporting an openly man hating presidential candidate. Attending an event where were only begrudgingly offered an invite to make up the numbers and paying $2700 for the pleasure.
E=MC² Bitch
What idiots did buy anyways? Giving Hilary 2.5K is like winning your Mangina Badge.
You can also get the badge for free, but in that case you have to turn your b~~~~ in at the feminist counter.
It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.
Anonymous14To be fair ours was pretty good, unlike Clinton she did actually understand how the world works.
Are you serious? That skank abolished free milk for British schoolchildren. I’m not a Brit but I don’t really need to be one realise what an evil c~~~ she was. Here is her list of achievements:
1. She supported the retention of capital punishment
2. She destroyed the country’s manufacturing industry
3. She voted against the relaxation of divorce laws
4. She abolished free milk for schoolchildren (“Margaret Thatcher, Milk Snatcher”)
5. She supported more freedom for business (and look how that turned out)
6. She gained support from the National Front in the 1979 election by pandering to the fears of immigration
7. She gerrymandered local authorities by forcing through council house sales, at the same time preventing councils from spending the money they got for selling houses on building new houses (spending on social housing dropped by 67% in her premiership)
8. She was responsible for 3.6 million unemployed – the highest figure and the highest proportion of the workforce in history and three times the previous government. Massaging of the figures means that the figure was closer to 5 million
9. She ignored intelligence about Argentinian preparations for the invasion of the Falkland Islands and scrapped the only Royal Navy presence in the islands
10. The poll tax
11. She presided over the closure of 150 coal mines; we are now crippled by the cost of energy, having to import expensive coal from abroad
12. She compared her “fight” against the miners to the Falklands War
13. She privatised state monopolies and created the corporate greed culture that we’ve been railing against for the last 5 years
14. She introduced the gradual privatisation of the NHS
15. She introduced financial deregulation in a way that turned city institutions into avaricious money pits
16. She pioneered the unfailing adoration and unquestioning support of the USA
17. She allowed the US to place nuclear missiles on UK soil, under US control
18. Section 28
19. She opposed anti-apartheid sanctions against South Africa and described Nelson Mandela as “that grubby little terrorist”
20. She support the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and sent the SAS to train their soldiers
21. She allowed the US to bomb Libya in 1986, against the wishes of more than 2/3 of the population
22. She opposed the reunification of Germany
23. She invented Quangos
24. She increased VAT from 8% to 17.5%
25. She had the lowest approval rating of any post-war Prime Minister
26. Her post-PM job? Consultant to Philip Morris tobacco at $250,000 a year, plus $50,000 per speech
27. The Al Yamamah contract
28. She opposed the indictment of Chile’s General Pinochet
29. Social unrest under her leadership was higher than at any time since the General Strike
30. She presided over interest rates increasing to 15%
31. BSE
32. She presided over 2 million manufacturing job losses in the 79-81 recession
33. She opposed the inclusion of Eire in the Northern Ireland peace process
34. She supported sanctions-busting arms deals with South Africa
35. Cecil Parkinson, Alan Clark, David Mellor, Jeffrey Archer, Jonathan Aitkin
36. Crime rates doubled under Thatcher
37. Black Wednesday – Britain withdraws from the ERM and the pound is devalued. Cost to Britain – £3.5 billion; profit for George Soros – £1 billion
38. Poverty doubled while she opposed a minimum wage
39. She privatised public services, claiming at the time it would increase public ownership. Most are now owned either by foreign governments (EDF) or major investment houses. The profits don’t now accrue to the taxpayer, but to foreign or institutional shareholders.
40. She cut 75% of funding to museums, galleries and other sources of education
41. In the Thatcher years the top 10% of earners received almost 50% of the tax remissions
42. 21.9% inflation
43. Covered up the Hillsborough disaster to protect the police.
Source: http://www.dystopiaearth.com/?p=1998
The Americans should brace themselves for something similar or considering its Hitlary, something way more catastrophical.
Lol there’s going to be a rocket increase in MGTOW come 2016-17, we’re f~~~ed.
After 8 years of GW Bush, I am not sure when the GOP will ever regain the White House. If the GOP has this mentality that the Democrats had running Kerry against Bush, they will be into a rude awakening. Rand Paul gets eaten alive by numerous of the other factions in the primaries. The establishment candidates get eaten alive by the Tea Party candidates, and the Tea Party candidates will get slaughtered in the general election (Tea Party is pariah among the general public and independents). So, very likely the Democrat wins by default in the end.
Yeah but now the democrats have to answer for 8 years of Obama…and really who are their candidates right now? They have Hilary who is so plagued by scandals she is forced to avoid the media to an extreme extent, I don’t see how she could hope to survive a primary without some serious damage done to her.
http://www.businessinsider.com/does-hillary-clinton-have-a-deal-to-avoid-the-press-2014-6
Just google it, there are dozens and dozens of sources all saying the same thing about her. If she has a good platform to run on, and doesn’t have anything to hide…why is she hiding from the media? As a potential voter don’t you want a candidate who is trying to get their message out there, not go into permanent damage control mode?
What is their other option…Bernie Sanders…the self proclaimed socialist? His primary voters will be career welfare bums and people buried in student debt who want a bail out. If you aren’t one of those people all he is going to do for you is raise your taxes up.
Plus the republicans probably aren’t losing the house or the senate anytime soon. If the democrats want to run someone as corrupt as Clinton or radical as Sanders…they won’t be able to get anything done. I’m not particularly thrilled with anyone in the republican’s line up at this point, but when you aren’t trying to use Rand Paul, the most radical of the bunch, as a measuring stick for the republican party, they have some candidates that are closer to the center than the democrats do right now. Political affiliations aside, I’d rather see a centrist president at this point that is actually going to work with both sides and be willing to compromise, rather than another radical like Obama who is going to pretty much tell the other side my way or the highway, then turn around and cry when they pick the highway and start blocking as much of his agenda as possible.
Anonymous11The media will paper over this corporatist c~~~’s overflowing closet of skeletons very effectively. The Butcher of Bengazi will show the World what hearing women roar sounds like. It’ll be a good time to be one of her cronies/cronettes though.
This woman is pure evil in a pantsuit. I enjoyed how it was recently reported that when she was down in South Carolina she was speaking with a fake Southern accent. That’s a pretty good acting job(mirroring) from a Chicago born thugette.
The Hitlery loving manginas being told they could not enter all the while patiently waiting outside like obedient manginas just in case they needed to be used. That is so mangina.
Anonymous14Anyone expecting the official release of a Hillary Clinton lesbian sex vid sometime in the future? I for one am. 😛 😀
Margaret Thatcher was a corrupted c~~~ bro but Triklops nailed it so I don’t have s~~~ to add, well done btw.
As for women not showing, well what can I say Hillary?, women can be fickle c~~~s sometimes but I’m sure you know this.
"The wounds of honor are self inflicted"
This woman is pure evil in a pantsuit.
Even as a young child there was something about her I didn’t like, I didn’t know why, but somehow I knew something was wrong with her.
Think it safest if we agree to disagree on Mrs T, although seems we are mostly agreed on Mrs C.
Anonymous14Aww..looks like someone has a crush on Mrs. T 💘💘💘
Could you atleast tell us why you like her so much? No judgements. Just for arguments sake.
Margaret Thatcher was so hated that even people here in Australia celebrated her death and we didn’t even have to deal with her s~~~.
I’m no fan of her bulls~~~ class warfare tactics either looking into what she did.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678