Feminists, White Feather Suffragettes, guilt shaming men into war

Topic by InvisibleMan

InvisibleMan

Home Forums Political Corner Feminists, White Feather Suffragettes, guilt shaming men into war

This topic contains 9 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by RedDawn  RedDawn 4 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #128217
    +5
    InvisibleMan
    InvisibleMan
    Participant
    134

    Did you know that feminists used to go around pinning white feathers on men as a way to guilt and shame them into going to war? They participated in pre-meditated hate campaigns aimed at young boys and men that simply beggar belief. These are the same women who also claimed to be the so called ‘suffragettes’ vying for womens rights.

    http://antimisandry.com/article-comments/48536.htm

    http://antimisandry.com/chit-chat-main/58815.htm

    And they are making a movie about this- yet I bet they conveniently forget to add the part about placing whites feathers on ‘cowardly’ men.
    http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/05/meryl-streep-backlash-suffragette-t-shirt-slogan

    #128221
    +2

    Anonymous
    18

    I learned of that fact (targeting able bodied men and shaming them to die for some f~~~ed up cause) in grade 9. Always tried to look for hidden agendas behind shaming. Whether it was personal or experience as a 3rd party. Failed at times to ignore the personal jabs at times in all things life.

    But shaming is now just perceived to be a reaction to me/men breaking free of mental imprisonment of ages.

    It is when I encounter non-shaming language that my alarms go off (women for men*s rights, against feminism).

    #128228
    +5
    ILiveAgain
    ILiveAgain
    Participant

    If one stops watching tv and listening to females, sjw and white knights, picks up books pre 1950 and read about what really went on ….. then you will be much wiser and understand just how twisted and false modern feminism is.

    As usual … they only teach selective history …. just like all dictatorships.

    #128229
    +1
    Untamed
    Untamed
    Participant

    And then weemins gleefully declare that without men there’d be no war. They’re full of contradiction and non-sense. Once it’s been shown they’re full of s~~~ their shaming tactics actually become quite hilarious.
    Then again, a man who’s moved because of a shaming tactic is a weak-willed man. Feminism survives thanks to weak men.ginas

    Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
    Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
    #GenderSegragationNow!

    #128254
    +1
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    And then weemins gleefully declare that without men there’d be no war.

    We all know that’s not true.I mean look at how they treat each other, getting into vicious catfights and stuff.

    #128258
    +2
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    Common men like us didn’t have the vote for a long time either. Only wealthy land owners did. Those land owners wanted common men to fight their wars and to pie us off, they gave us the vote. Common men got the vote by offering to fight during times of war. Along came suffragettes wanting the vote. They also wanted to trade military service for the vote but it would still be men paying for it. They wanted mandatory military service for men and in return they get the right to vote. Of course men objected. The suffragettes biggest opposition came from other women, not men, who were anti-lesbian and knew that the suffragette movement was filled with lesbians. The suffragette movement only wanted to get the vote for white women, no blacks, Asians, etc, and they also considered homosexuals to be the ultimate misogynist. I guess because they had the audacity to not even be attracted to women.

    While women did not have the right to vote, they DID have the right to run for public office. Feminists will NEVER reveal that point. Feminists will also never tell you that yes men could beat their wives legally, men were also punished by the law for crimes that their wives and daughters committed. Basically, the law punished the men and he was expected in turn to punish his family members. The government did not want to interfere in family affairs, which is the polar opposite of government philosophy today. i could go on but I think you can see that the feminist narrative of history is filled with half truths and gaps. There was never a conspiracy to keep women down.

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #128260
    +1
    Untamed
    Untamed
    Participant

    And then weemins gleefully declare that without men there’d be no war.

    We all know that’s not true.I mean look at how they treat each other, getting into vicious catfights and stuff.

    Yes, we all that’s not true. Yet they tow that line in that argument that men are more violent than weemins. That’s not true either but that idea supports the lies of domestic violence and D.M supports the lie of rape culture and so on and so forth. One lie leads to the next until a monster of an agenda like the War on Men.

    Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
    Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
    #GenderSegragationNow!

    #128264
    +2
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    good info , i didn’t know about the feathers..that’s f~~~ed up . . another mgtow lesson for me !

    #128275
    +3
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    If one stops watching tv and listening to females, sjw and white knights, picks up books pre 1950 and read about what really went on ….. then you will be much wiser and understand just how twisted and false modern feminism is.

    As usual … they only teach selective history …. just like all dictatorships.

    True, and that goes for the movies from that era too. It was a wildly different world back then.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #128708
    RedDawn
    RedDawn
    Participant
    1391

    In another thread entitled ‘victims’ Untamed mentioned he sent a text to a woman he had broken up with whom tried to shame him (after she got marriage rabies in her head) with Untamed saying that ‘we are both the victims and perpetrators of our own deeds’.

    This statement makes a lot of sense, because as men many of us have fallen for the shaming tactics, which perpetuate this type of behaviour from women. In his case, Untamed used this assertion to stand his ground and not let her manipulate him. Subsequently she conceded to his assertiveness and left him alone.

    What I take from this is, that as men we need to counteract shaming tactics with assertiveness and perhaps philosophically challenging ideas. If we didn’t simply and begrudgingly accept our ‘marching orders’ on a wide scale then maybe we wouldn’t be our own victims in this and many other situations.

    Courage is the key to life itself - Morgan Freeman

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.