Home › Forums › Relations~~~s › Feminists did it again: you can go to jail for 'manspreading'
Tagged: Manspreading
This topic contains 9 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by The Apprentice 4 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
They’re getting anything they’re asking for, now you can get arrested for ‘manspreading’, not only they were able to get away with a totally misandric term (since women can spread too, plus they take space with their bags) so theoretically in the sense of equality it should be called ‘spreading’ but you kno “they’re all about equality”
And like always, this will affect minorities and the poor, well done geniuses, well done!
Besides, his color choices are so out of fashion — jail is too good for him! Just kidding of course, but I don’t ride NYC subways either.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
Anonymous0Any Information for how long the men will be arrested.
Since feminists are all about equality, I’m still waiting for them to push for a law that punishes women for taking up 5 seats just for their bags in the train.
Feminism is equality after all, right?
It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.
FFS I guess us men should be crying foul when women use up the vast majority of the upper cabin space of a plane trying to fit their damn near full sized bags and trying to claim that it’s a “carry on”. That s~~~ is not only disruptive, but outright ignorant. I always see at least one woman doing that s~~~ every time I fly and I do that at least 4 times a year.
Edit: Thankfully someone covered this already: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5vDb0WyIPk
Sho’Nuff:
Fortunately, I don’t have that problem. My sole carry-on item is a small rucksack and it’s small enough that it can be squeezed underneath the seat in front of me. The rest goes into the one suitcase that I take and which ends up in the hold. Any more pieces and I have to pay extra.
Every time I fly, I am bewildered about why people have to take so much stuff with them into the cabin. If nothing else, it only adds to the amount of time I have to wait getting in and out of the plane.
Hehehe, excuse me for laughing, but this new law has to be one of the most ridiculous laws that have been made in a really long time.
Imagine, while this law is being ratified, wars are being fought, there is famine and water shortage across many parts of the world, diseases like Ebola are spreading, and the economy are all but stable…
Imagine, amongst all these worldwide problems, all that these feminists are focusing on is the distance between a mans legs while he is sitting on the bus:)
It is a matter of perspective, a thing that these feminists clearly lack, and in great abundance too:):)
The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal - Aristotle (384 - 322 BC)
And it will be a total pain in the ass because it will be up to the officer’s current quotas to judge if you’re manspreading or not, look at those poor devils, they got arrested at 12:30 AM do you think the metro was packed at that time? In other words, if you’re a man and using the metro then you will have to be standing all the time just to make sure.
Oh and I also read this bulls~~~ on a feminist website, see how they do this for equality?
Second. If anyone should be allowed to take up two seats on a bus on account of “rights,” it’s women. Because, in case you hadn’t noticed, it is women, not men, who are constantly being harassed and assaulted — by men — on the bus. It is women who must spend their entire commute to work in a panic because some man has decided to sit next to her with his hand purposefully touching her thigh, it is women who have to worry about being flashed or groped by a man who is sitting next to them on the bus, it is women who are sexually harassed and “chatted up” by men within a confined space from which they have no escape.
The most funny part about feminist outrage about “man spreading” is not -as they claim- the rudeness of taking up too much space on a subway, but the
hilariously, obviously Freudian fear of being directly confronted (conflicted?) with a man’s genitals, power and manhood.
I really just see this as entertainment.
Do women not understand male anatomy? I can’t pull my legs together as close as you can because MY C~~~ AND B~~~~ WILL GET SQUISHED. Who the hell actually made this into a law? Some female only legislators?
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678