Feminists are terrorized by anal sex

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

No, Teen Vogue, the backlash to your anal sex article was not rooted in homophobia

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/teen-vogue-anal-sex-prostate-owner-sheila-michaels-feminism-teenagers-a7831671.html

😀 😀 😀
LOL

I think that we should recommend to MGTOW who still have sex with women to primarily engage them in anal sex.
😀

Thoughts?

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[X11Spectator 4520]

No matter what hole you stick it in, your gonna get s~~~ on you.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

The same week that came out, there was a UK article about iirc 12 to 16 y.o. girls s~~~ting themselves because they damaged their assholes with anal sex.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

X11 wrote:

No matter what hole you stick it in, your gonna get s~~~ on you.

Sure, but I foresee that s~~~’s gonna hitting the fan with gays/GBT due that.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[X11Spectator 4520]

Eric Lauder wrote:

X11 wrote:

No matter what hole you stick it in, your gonna get s~~~ on you.

Sure, but I foresee that s~~~’s gonna hitting the fan with gays/GBT due that.

Nah you got the physics wrong, they won’t have the muscle control to project s~~~ into the fan.

More like s~~~ just falling out their anus.

[X11Spectator 4520]

S~~~ty topic.

[joetechParticipant]

You can’t get them pregnant like that.
“Hey, she’s a really good piece of ass.”

“No s~~~?”

“Just a little.”

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[GregB0Participant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

No, Teen Vogue, the backlash to your anal sex article was not rooted in homophobia

<iframe class=”wp-embedded-content” sandbox=”allow-scripts” security=”restricted” style=”position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);” src=”http://www.feministcurrent.com/2017/07/20/no-teen-vogue-backlash-anal-sex-article-not-rooted-homophobia/embed/#?secret=HzklyqkcQl” data-secret=”HzklyqkcQl” width=”500″ height=”282″ title=”“No, Teen Vogue, the backlash to your anal sex article was not rooted in homophobia” — Feminist Current” frameborder=”0″ marginwidth=”0″ marginheight=”0″ scrolling=”no”></iframe>

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/teen-vogue-anal-sex-prostate-owner-sheila-michaels-feminism-teenagers-a7831671.html

LOL

I think that we should recommend to MGTOW who still have sex with women to primarily engage them in anal sex.

Thoughts?

Per the article
=======================================================
It tells them their identity is not “woman”, but rather “non-man”. It tells them that should they consent to anal sex, their body is just a hole for the man to penetrate, and the part of their body that is most sensitive and reliable for the female orgasm is so irrelevant that it doesn’t even warrant a label. It tells them that consenting to anal sex is not about their pleasure, but about their partner’s.
=======================================================

Funny that they still are thinking that men think about the women’s pleasure when we are mostly thinking of the orgasm. Anything along the way is inconsequential if it does not lead directly to the orgasm.

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

[John Woods 13Participant 2855]

GregB0 wrote:

Per the article
=======================================================
It tells them their identity is not “woman”, but rather “non-man”. It tells them that should they consent to anal sex, their body is just a hole for the man to penetrate, and the part of their body that is most sensitive and reliable for the female orgasm is so irrelevant that it doesn’t even warrant a label. It tells them that consenting to anal sex is not about their pleasure, but about their partner’s.
=======================================================

That’s a crock of s~~~, pun intended.
Everyone knows that women like to take it up the ass. In fact, statistics clearly show that ass f~~~ing gives them consistently both more and stronger orgasms. They just won’t admit it publicly.
In fact, they don’t want to admit they enjoy sex in general, regardless of the hole being penetrated. WHY, you ask? Because that would mean that sex is mutually beneficial and thus mutually desired, and as such, since both parties benefit equally, one party should NOT be required to provide ADDITIONAL resources in order to obtain said benefit.
Simply put, if women admit to liking sex, men would stop paying for it. Women cannot have that now, can they?

The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!

[OldschoolParticipant 2481]

Anal is fun because it is kinky, other than that you get s~~~ on your dick and that smells.

Get a vasectomy.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Oldschool wrote:

Anal is fun because it is kinky, other than that you get s~~~ on your dick and that smells.

The part of the s~~~ is actually disgusting, however it happen only the first time: if you f~~~ again within minutes / less than an hour, the second time the dick is clean when it came out.

John Woods 13 wrote:

In fact, they don’t want to admit they enjoy sex in general, regardless of the hole being penetrated. WHY, you ask? Because that would mean that sex is mutually beneficial and thus mutually desired, and as such, since both parties benefit equally, one party should NOT be required to provide ADDITIONAL resources in order to obtain said benefit.
Simply put, if women admit to liking sex, men would stop paying for it. Women cannot have that now, can they?

This

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

The article is pure feminist/mangina bulls~~~, once again. To quote the very first sentence:

“Defining women by the men around them is an issue feminists have sought to address, and correct, for years.”

Women define themselves by the other women around them. It’s always been this way, and always will be. It’s only feminists that take uniquely women’s mental health issues and frame them as if men perpetrate them. Here’s another: women perpetrate more domestic violence than men. But do you hear that? ohhhhh no. And another: women say men should stop slut-shaming/fat-shaming, but women do far more of that to other women than men do.

Lesson: if the sentence starts with “…..women…..” you can bet your bottom dollar it’s a woman’s problem, not a man’s. It’s a s~~~ test.

[Author]

Posts