Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Feminist propoganda or feminist science killing men?
This topic contains 4 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by RedPill 5 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Evening Lads,
I’m new to the group, just joined today and am happy there is something like this out there! The feminised capitalist societies we live in needs to come to an end.
I am creating this post as I feel this topic deserves some serious attention, I noticed It the other day I will reference a few sources below, I am very concerned about the amount of research that is going into this alongside the amount of feminist movements that are popping up.
Can anyone tell me if this science is legit or if it is another method of trying to break down a mans ego, make him feel vulnerable and useless in this world which already only places his worth on his wage packet. A way of trying to snatch the last thing a man could say makes him a man, I say this due to the wording in some articles regarding it, the headlines are an insult!
I hope this gets picked up as this truly is quite disconcerting.
Links to three different news articles covering the topic;
(They are all set to open up in new tabs)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/opinion/men-who-needs-them.html?_r=0
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-59196/How-women-make-babies-men.html
This next one in particular grabbed me look at the way he talks about his essence (A definite mangina) and the illustrations used.
Women like to throw this around, but seem to forget that an artificial womb is much more plausible, and probably closer to us than eliminating men altogether.
I was suspecting this but from what I can see we have only really perfected the egg process rather than the actual womb in which the egg is incubated, but I’m gathering from your response this science is actually just speculation as opposed to fact?
Okay, my response to the first article my response is are you sure it is the men that aren’t the necessary ones anymore? Think about it, we have a higher life expectancy and a lower infant mortality rate than ever. Why do we need whiny, unproductive women when the human race doesn’t seem to need to produce as many children?
I can just hear the feminist’s favorite label on this one: “MISOYGNIST!” Well, bitches, if you don’t like it being done to you then don’t do it to others.
Second article, well, let’s just create artificial ovaries and wombs, you know we shouldn’t exclude gay men from the process.
The third article, assuming we can find technology to fully replace the other gender in society, I guarantee you, women are going to be the first ones to get phased out.
Top reply Jimbo!
So I will just go with, if any gender, women will be the first to be pushed out, and put articles like this down to just more femic~~~ male ego bashing.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678