Feminist panic growing over sex robots

[numbCruncherParticipant 772]

More panic from feminists about the growing realization that men will soon no longer need women at all for sex.

Why female sex robots are more dangerous than you think

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/female-robots-why-this-scarlett-johansson-bot-is-more-dangerous/

These are the same women who spent decades crowing that vibrators were far more satisfying than sex with a real man, and how vibrators made men feel inadequate and insecure. The same women who objectified men now complain about being replaced by objects.

So when it happens to men, it’s funny, but when it happens to women, it’s dangerous?

These are the same hypocrites who sneered that men were obsolete and would be replaced by robots in the workplace. The same hypocrites who for decades took men’s sacrifices and our contribution to society for granted, whose view of men was so one-dimensional that they believed we could be replaced by pieces of plastic and metal – these women will now be replaced by pieces of plastic and metal.

The free market finds alternatives to overpriced commodities. And for men, pussy is currently an overpriced commodity.

They believe that men cannot survive without women. But we can. The human race may end, but individual men will be just fine. Our individual life-span and quality of life will not be affected. Without a bunch of parasites stealing our children and our money, our lives may even improve.

They think we need them to give us children, when for decades they have taken our children from us.

Having their hypocrisy so starkly exposed does not bother these women. For decades, they have escaped any censure for even the most egregious hypocrisy. They are panicking because they are afraid that they will no longer be able to trap even 10% of men into supporting them indefinitely by having a child against the man’s wishes.

They are panicking because they know that once men start interacting sexually with robots on a large scale, feminist’s lies about rape will lose credibility even in the mainstream media.

They are panicking because when men have no need to interact with them at all, their free ride will no longer be available. When men have no need to interact with women, feminists will have to start building their own roads and houses, running their own utilities, making their own medicines, finding their own food, disposing of their own trash.

And despite all the rhetoric, they know they simply cannot do this.

You say "love is a temple, love the higher law" ...You ask me to enter, but then you make me crawl. And I can't be holding on to what you got, when all you got is hurt

[AwakenedParticipant 35203]

Marriage RATES ARE WAY DOWN in Western Countries !!

Women are losing out on Securing a Wallet, and they can’t AFFORD to be replaced !!

Oh Yes, THEIR Panic and Worry will only INTENSIFY as THIS Technology Improves, and we all know how Quick Technology IMPROVES !!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Anonymous 11]

Without sex, what else does a woman have to offer? Sex is not even sufficient to overcome the rest of the semi-random baggage any woman will bring into my life.

There is going to be a concerted effort to ban sex robots once the tech matures and a market begins to develop. My only concern is whether they can get enough blue pillers and manginas to join the ban wagon.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10911]

Even with a ban on the robots, there will still be a black market for them. Feminists tried to ban prostitution, porn and strip clubs and yet these activities still exist today.
Men will find a way to overcome and adapt.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Let the trollops panic!

“Men are not marrying because women will not stay married.”

[Anonymous 42]

If sex wasn’t the only worthless thing they brought to the table then they wouldn’t be in such panic.

Gone are the men that once upon at time cared about women…

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I only hope they can do other thing too. Like shovel the walk.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 1]

It will be good until the sex robots will ask for the right to vote, and from there we know where the road goes….

Let’s have sex with my robot wife!
“Honey – I – do – not – feel – like – doing – it”
But you are a robot, I pretend sex now!
“911 what’s your emergency?”
“My – husband- is – raping – me”

Sir you are under arrest!

But that’s a robot!

Robots have feelings too Sir!

F~~~!

[Anonymous 25]

It’s a disappointing reflection of the way women are portrayed in society – Ma’s clever three dimensional creation is about as one dimensional as you can get.

Is all this cause for concern? Of course. Because right now more money is being spent on making these things than thinking about the ethical and societal ramifications. We already know porn provides a terrifying reflection on how society views women, which can manifest itself in real life.

But what happens when machines start contributing to the objectification of women too?

and how is porn of a reflection of how society views women? why isn’t it a reflection of how society views men? They are both doing the same act. She’s a sexist pig

She exposes herself as nothing more than a toxic man hater, who regurgitates feminist spoon fed arguments about objectifying women. While women are the ones who have been objectifying men for ages with vibrators.our

Men don’t objectify women because under sales of goods laws, objects have to be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose. women are neither

[GrumpyParticipant]

Whats the CBA for a female robot compared to a Real Woman ™?
Initial investment?
Monthly maintenance costs?
Any additional “fees”?

Minus all the additional make-up, food, hygiene products, birth control, demands for dining out/entertainment it MUST be cheaper in the short run and in the long run as well.

Mind you if they build them like modern cars/electronics. it wont be worth the money as the “lifespan” will be about 4 years, s~~~ty quality but looks good, and will probably require constant COSTLY maintenance.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Anonymous 0]

Carefully reading the article, the c~~~ implies that men will abuse the robots. And then with some weird logic that I still can’t get……somehow if the robot has a real woman’s image (actress or whatever), it’s the same as abusing that person. Now that is some convoluted s~~~ right there. But, besides that bulls~~~, my claim is that no man would ever willingly abuse a robot that he paid $10,000-$20,000 for.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

Without sex, what else does a woman have to offer? Sex is not even sufficient to overcome the rest of the semi-random baggage any woman will bring into my life.

There is going to be a concerted effort to ban sex robots once the tech matures and a market begins to develop. My only concern is whether they can get enough blue pillers and manginas to join the ban wagon.

Even with sex, a 35+ year old male most of the time is going to be uninterested. That’s basic biology. Modern Western society is built on bad science, where women reach puberty at the age of 18 and desire marriage and children at 35 (lol, the most “fertile” age for a woman in Western society science), and where men’s sex drive at 40 is the same as at 14 (apparently males do in fact pass puberty at that age, just not females).

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Is it illegal to abuse a car? Especially one that reminds you of your ex girlfriend?

Of course not. It’s your property and you could do what you want.

Are we becoming so totalitarian that we can’t see that they are trying to control our thoughts by controlling what we purchase and own?

It’s a think like a couch or a chair.

If I want to whip my chair than dang gummit I’m gonna give my chair a good whelpin on it’s hide.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

They refuse to see whats going on.

Men are going after glorified flesh lights instead of women. Instead of asking what is wrong with women, they blame men.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Why would a man abuse the robot? She does not demand s~~~, order him around, drive him crazy n s~~~. Only real modern human females do that

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Anonymous 0]

Russky wrote:

Why would a man abuse the robot? She does not demand s~~~, order him around, drive him crazy n s~~~. Only real modern human females do that

I’m pretty sure the warranty won’t cover willful abuse. Now maybe after old Harmony gets 200,000 miles on her and is a bit threadbare, vagina been replaced/rebuilt 7 times, maybe have some fun target practice down at the deer lease with her (assuming you’ve already ordered the newest Harmony 5.0).

[Author]

Posts