Feminist men should let their wives cheat on them. Girls night out anyone?

[FrankOneParticipant 1435]

Interestingly, if you read the entire article you’ll find the man is a ‘househusband’ and wifey pays the bills — i.e. she truly IS a strong, independent woman, not amongst the 99% who SAY they are.  So he is what used to be called a ‘kept’ man…

At least it’s open and both parties agree to it.  If he didn’t want it he could have divorce-raped her and MAYBE had the kids (after all, he takes care of them so that is not at all unrealistic in this odd case — who knows, he might even be awarded vaginamoney?).  I do think terms like that should be decided BEFORE kids, i.e. don’t have 2 children & THEN tell the husband or wife you want an open marriage…  I also don’t see the reason for a legal marriage at all…

I do take exception to this:

“I am an economically dependent househusband coping with the withering drudgery of child-rearing. Now that I understand the reality of that situation, I don’t blame women for demanding more for themselves than the life of the housewife. ”

In this case, does ‘demanding more’ mean wearing the pants and providing for Children and househusband, or having sex with lots of men?  Or both?

The article does make an honest distinction between ‘caring’ for the children (what he does) and ‘providing’ for them (what wifey does).

I don’t see why everybody needs to fit the same mold/lifestyle.  I DO disagree strongly with the tone of the article (pedestalizing the woman and HER needs and making it all about her and linking open marriage to feminism/politics) instead of simply stating ‘some men and women must have multiple lovers to feel satisfied so open marriage may be a good option if both parties agree’ instead of linking it with feminism, instead of asking, why isn’t this a socially acceptable option?  The article is stranger still and not completely honest, in that it does not even acknowledge it’s usually the MAN that proposes open marriage…  As I say, if you live a polyamory lifestyle I don’t quite see the reason for a marriage either…

It isn’t just women that lose interest in sex or have low libido; some are nymphos.  I spent years with a woman with higher sex drive than mine and who never withheld sex… Delicious…

As for the whole femdom thing, it’s a common male fantasy, which is why men pay for a professional dominatrix.  I would argue there are fewer women into it.  I would also say that many men who are wealthy and powerful like to be on the bottom or subservient to women in bed.  The article didn’t get into their sexual tastes but I would surmise she’s looking for dominant males outside the marriage and has a sexually submissive husband but that is supposition on my part.  Or he doesn’t turn her on or give her strong orgasms for whatever reason.  Obviously both parties need to be wary of STD’s in this kind of relations~~~.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Frankone,

Dont know you, Im not familiar with your posts, and Im the LAST to question this, but: that sounds like a females reply.

I disagree with everything you said. I think the article is BS propaganda. Nothing of value, and is an attempt to demoralize men.

I dont see too many men signing up to be a household nanny, so their wives can be psuedo power c~~~s. Bs. Total bs.

Sickening propeganda, thats all this “article” was.

 

Resident cynic.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Exsliventxs wrote:

Open marriage is an oxymoron. Like monogamous swinger.

Man. It had to be a women that came up with that kind of mindless nonsense.  It’s dribble like that, that only fuels the MGHOW fire.  It’s far less complicated to just keep going my own way…

MrDextro wrote:

Ten years later a girlfriend of mine cheated on me and I threw the guy down the stairs

MGTOW:  Because at some point, you just get tired of the constant assclownary of women…

As an additional note, I’m going to have to side with Ancientwisdom on this one. Sounds helluvofalot of propaganda. And I’m not buying into it. Gotta say, maybe it’s just another tool in the feminist trade to spread this kind of BS. To write an article from the “male perspective” saying it’s alright to be somebody’s plaything. That goes against the very principal of being a man, the very fiber that makes us what we are. I’m not buying it.. not for one goddamn second.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[FrankOneParticipant 1435]

AncientWisdom: Calling me a little girl is the same sort of shaming tactic women employ when they say ‘Man up’.

That said, I agree the article is somewhat propaganda in that it attempts to link feminism with this lifestyle.  My view on all this is the State shouldn’t sanction any form of ‘marriage’; you draw up your own private contract IF you want to, just like any other contract.  If it provides for polyamory, monogamy, renewals, etc, that’s your business… And it SHOULD be required that such documents spell out division of property on separation AND child custody.

The wife in the article, wants to have a conventional home life and children, while banging lots of men on the side.  My main beef with the article isn’t that, but that it wasn’t established at the beginning of the relations~~~ and that it was linked with ‘feminism’, instead of being stated simply that some people want to be polyamorous.  I don’t consider it ‘immoral’ as long as you’re upfront with partners and potential partners about desiring polyamory.  Personally I’ve never been in a polyamorous relations~~~ but I have no issues with others that pursue that lifestyle.

As for ‘demoralizing’ me, their lifestyle doesn’t ‘demoralize’ me at all.  Nor do any other consensual sexual arrangements between adults.  I’ve got two gay guys living 3 houses down from me.  Their lifestyle doesn’t harm me.  They keep their yard up, and are good people.  Now, I don’t favor gay OR straight marriage being ENSHRINED into law and favoring certain relationship forms however… It’s all about freedom.

I see NO problem with the woman going out to work and the man raising the children — why dictate one-size-fits all relations~~~s?  Isn’t this a GOOD relationship form between a submissive man and dominant woman?  Obviously, VERY few women are going for that option for obvious reasons, because it isn’t their nature.. But for those that do I say go for it, just be upfront with the partner (in my mind, she wasn’t in this case).

Is polyamory bad for the children?  There doesn’t appear to be definitive research on the topic.  https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/201301/is-polyamory-bad-the-children

 

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

What I learned from this article.

Male feminists are pussywhipped little bitches.

Also, women are cheating whores more than they’d like to admit.

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[Author]

Posts