Feminist Jurisprudence- kiss free speech goodbye

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Feminist Jurisprudence:
Equal Rights Or Neo-Paternalism?

by Michael Weiss and Cathy Young

“Yet today, the broadest and most relentless assaults on free speech come from radical feminists determined to quash “harassing” or “degrading” speech. Through the use of civil rather than criminal law for purposes of censorship, and under the guise of legislating equality, large areas of speech are becoming per se illegal, unbeknownst to the majority of Americans. [1]The target this time is not a pervasive Communist conspiracy but a collection of far more ubiquitous enemies: the sexual harasser, the insensitive college student, the consumer of pornography.”

[1]Charles Fried, quoted in John Leo, “Scaling the Shabby Barricades,” Washington Times, May 7, 1992, p. G4.

“In the past decade, feminist legal theory has become a formidable presence in many of America’s top law schools. Feminist activism has also had a major impact on many areas of the law, including rape, self-defense, domestic violence, and such new legal categories as sexual harassment. However, the ideology of legal feminism today goes far beyond the original and widely supported goal of equal treatment for both sexes. The new agenda is to redistribute power from the “dominant class” (men) to the “subordinate class” (women), and such key concepts of Western jurisprudence as judicial neutrality and individual rights are declared to be patriarchal fictions designed to protect male privilege.”

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Great article.

Don’t forget the campaign to ban “bossy”. That is just the start. What will be the next words.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 1]

Oh yeah.
This is the end of order, for sure.

I would even say that, for the little I researched about feminism, even in the past, it was NEVER about equality. Women always had the chance to do whatever they wanted. As long as they accepted the consequences. But they didn’t want that, I mean, the consequences.

So now is all about giving women all the benefits that society provides, withour chraging them any of the responsabilities, that is a men’s job… Right?

This is really sad, but I do believe in Karma, in some degree. And what goes around, COMES around.

Stay safe brothers.

Cheers.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22584]

Anonymous wrote:

As long as they accepted the consequences. But they didn’t want that, I mean, the consequences.

I believe that is the key problem here. Feminists want women to have all the rewards and none of the responsibility, while the men have none of the rewards and all the responsibility.

In response, MGTOW came into creation as a general, unorganized response to feminist sexism.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

It’s going to get worse, I don’t see things getting any better. This is a war of attrition, fellas, the only hope is to help out other men, and watch these lady babies grow old and crazy with all their cats. Go all stealth mode, that helps.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Author]

Posts