Feminist Domestic Violence system corruption backfires

[Anonymous 25]

Police had 436 allegations of abusing their position for sexual gain in the corrupt feminist domestic violence industry. When they force the police to achieve Stalinist type quotas for “end violence against wimminz and girlz” and relaxed the evidential requirements what did they expect was going to happen.

This is now a great defence for any guy they try and target with malicious prosecutions to reach feminist quotas such as that case where they arrested a guy for walking through a train station and then are alleged to how slowed down cctv evidence, which clearly showed he couldn’t have done it.

Any guy facing a false accusation of domestic violence or sexual assault or rape when they are acquitted should accuse the police of abusing their position for sexual gain and make a complaint so it can be fully investigated.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/12/08/hundreds-police-officers-accused-sexually-exploiting-crime-victims/

This goes on all the time and men are the real victims here as they end up with a conviction while some female psychopath makes false accusations against the man and gets her leg over with the police officer so they do stuff like slow down cctv evidence or just destroy the cctv evidence.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

This is why cops must wear bodycams to protect themselves from c~~~s who cry rape at them and the dumbasses in the comment section are blaming this on the big bad mussies instead of the women making the accusations.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Any bulls~~~ a man engages in at the behest of a woman is HIS fault, not hers.

When you’re a police officer, you have a responsibility to protect the public trust. You break that and it’s on you. Blaming it on a woman? That’s some weak s~~~, right there.

[Anonymous 25]

Well when you take the evidence from that article above and put it together with the previous research where it was found that:

“Within my research (McCarrick et al., in press) the predominant experience is of men being arrested under false charges of IPV and their disclosures of victimisation not being taken seriously, despite having evidence.”

And put all that together with the evidence of police arresting an innocent man walking through a train station and slowing down cctv evidence and 300+ similar cases.

Then you suddenly have a group litigation claim with possible big compensation payouts to those men.

Kerching – men going their own way and force feminists and the Government to pay out money for their corruption.

A lot of men could stand to make a lot of money and hit feminists and the Government where it hurts. I’ve seen this coming for a while, it’s going to happen sooner or later.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Stargazer wrote:

Any bulls~~~ a man engages in at the behest of a woman is HIS fault, not hers.

If you are a cop and you have to talk to a woman who throws a false one at you it is her fault for throwing a false one at you and it is the white knights fault for believing her. So if you are a cop you literally are forced to interact with women and because of that they do not deserve to be thrown under the bus because of it. Sure i am no fan of cops, the police or the government but throwing a individual cop under the bus because some bitch cried rape is unfair to the cop just because he had to talk to her or even that he did.

Stargazer wrote:

When you’re a police officer, you have a responsibility to protect the public trust. You break that and it’s on you. Blaming it on a woman? That’s some weak s~~~, right there.

This is some white knight logic right here when all the needs to happen to break the trust is one false rape accusation or abuse accusation then you and the entire department is f~~~ed and it does not matter if it is true or not a woman said it white knights believe it therefore it happened.

And when it comes to community’s you can’t have a man only community to police they will always be women in a town therefore there will always be a risk of one crying rape therefore you can’t do anything about it. The difference is that men need to wake the f~~~ up and decide that white knighting is not good for them and they should not take a woman’s words seriously unless the burden of proof is met which should stand extremely high.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Now we’ve elected a new top dog and he was the subject of false sexual allegations just a few months ago.

Executive order #1 Feminist Smackdown.

http://www.theatlantic.com/liveblogs/2016/10/donald-trump-sexual-assault-allegations/503969/

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Anonymous 6]

Do we have any law-related men here, would be interesting to hear their insigts!

[HitmanParticipant]

false accusations are not the fault of the accused.
just need to be vigilant about protecting yourself.
NEVER be alone with a female.

[LexParticipant 117]

Anonymous wrote:

Do we have any law-related men here, would be interesting to hear their insigts!

My experience with addressing false accusation are not positive, and I usually have concerns as I see men who have family pull away, sometimes wives will take the kids and move away, divorce – they loose custody and what they have worked for up until that point in their life. So they wait either months but usually years to have the matter addressed. They are known in their communities as so and so who did this terrible thing.

Now my insights on the investigation process and what happens is easier to list of examples:

– So you did not commit an offence but were arrested during the investigation as the officer was trying to determine what happened and since the alleged victim has given her side your legally arrested..
A) the accused doesn’t provide a statement the matter goes to the lawyers before it can be tossed because there is only one story that was given to the officer (This doesn’t give proof of innocence the charges lets say are dismissed for lake of evidence -your happy they are dismissed or withdrawn but your left the victim – the officer only gets an update on his file that the matter is not going to court charges withdraw)
B) the accused tells their side. the officer doesn’t feel it adds up after hearing both sides maybe there is another witness that will directly prove its a false accusations, or facebook, text messages (which is a pain to get and takes if your lucky six months to get processed through MLET – to the FBI – to the company with its services in the US) But the officers gets solid evidence to provide she lied and lets say bragging about it in messages. (You are lucky you had an officer that knows how to competently write warrants or production orders, won’t make a knee jerk reaction because of policies and wants to do the right thing)
C) The accused doesn’t provide a statement again only one persons story. The lawyers can’t come to an understanding between the defence and Crown. The matter goes before the courts. Trial takes two years to come and you had a really good lawyer that got internet records, chat logs, text messages that provide you did not commit any crime. (your name has been in the local papers – you owe money, maybe family members have pulled away – you are know as the guy that committed this offence because the papers won’t write a article of how you are innocent your not that special and if they did most people will say how you are guilty they just couldn’t prove it – we have all seen this at one time or another)

Now three scenarios how likely is it that any man that went through any of those processes wants to deal with police for charges against his accuser. (he probably doesn’t trust the police or the justice departments now)
Lets say he approaches and wants to know what his options are: and decides to provide a statement and enter into an investigation. Lets say its a scenario with evidence and the officer lays charges. Well the matter still goes before the Crown (justice departments lawyers) to decide if its in the public best interest to proceed and likely hood of a successful prosecution.
And it is likely that the matter will get media attention and I don’t think anyone here will disagree the headline won’t read Man/Husband/Father Falsely Accused. *This process has already taken a toll now to enter into the public lime light again.*

anonymousyam wrote:

This is why cops must wear bodycams to protect themselves

Preach! For an officer to have an accusation thrown out because there is video and audio evidence that he did nothing wrong. That is helpful for everyone! Keeps the public trust that officers are beyond reproach and if not those ones need to go.

But like I said before how many officers that deal with accusation and have evidence to provide otherwise… knowing the system, knowing how the media will gravitate would willing put themselves in the media lime light.

[AttonParticipant]

Body cams they need them.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[RoyDalParticipant]

Hitman wrote:

NEVER be alone with a female.

Doctors take seminars on how to avoid malpractice lawsuits, or win them if the inevitable happens.

One key piece of advice is that all doctors — male and female alike — should have a female nurse in the room with them when treating a woman.

Want to make some good money? Find a lawyer who will work for a percentage of the take and sue somebody. Make the plaintiff prove the negative.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[CataphractParticipant 2656]

It is one thing to have quotas for traffic offenses, it is quite another to have quotas for Domestic Violence, that is some wacked out s~~~ right there.

Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

[Anonymous 6]

Lex wrote:

But the officers gets solid evidence to provide she lied and lets say bragging about it in messages.

Thanks for the in depth response, very interesting internal perspective.

I assume as you’re talking about the crown, you are familiar with the debacle of Ghomeshi, and what those lying bitches did to his career and life, (if not see below article) I hope he sues CBC. Luckily a great law team did exactly what you said, and found they were bragging about it on texts and email. Thanks again for your perspective, its good to know some (although I don’t know how many), law enforcement are familiar with the ever-increasing number of false accusations that ruin mens lives (as you say, regardless if they are found innocent).

http://www.therebel.media/jian_ghomeshi_will_be_found_not_guilty

[narwhalParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Any guy facing a false accusation of domestic violence or sexual assault or rape when they are acquitted should accuse the police of abusing their position for sexual gain and make a complaint so it can be fully investigated.

If there is reason to believe their was abuse, right? You aren’t suggesting men blindly accuse police just to get revenge or something of that nature, are you?

I understand that people don’t like the police for some good reasons, but they are also the primary reasons society doesn’t break down into utter chaos. Let’s not ignore the vital service they provide and just assume they are all guilty of misconduct without an evidence. Let’s not blame the easy target, instead of the actual culprit or yourself. That is what BLM does, that is what women do. Nothing will change if we are not better then that. The truth matters.

Ok. Then do it.

[LexParticipant 117]

Anonymous wrote:

Lex wrote:
But the officers gets solid evidence to provide she lied and lets say bragging about it in messages.
Thanks for the in depth response, very interesting internal perspective.

I assume as you’re talking about the crown, you are familiar with the debacle of Ghomeshi, and what those lying bitches did to his career and life, (if not see below article) I hope he sues CBC. Luckily a great law team did exactly what you said, and found they were bragging about it on texts and email. Thanks again for your perspective, its good to know some (although I don’t know how many), law enforcement are familiar with the ever-increasing number of false accusations that ruin mens lives (as you say, regardless if they are found innocent).

http://www.therebel.media/jian_ghomeshi_will_be_found_not_guilty%5B/quote%5D

I was thinking about the Ghomeshi trial as I posted earlier.
He was lucky to have an amazing lawyer!
This was the first time I personally saw political interest groups, womans rights groups, SJWs – yelling for a mans head on a platter (they didn’t care about the facts or the evidence) and the trial went ahead… I know of no one in my profession that ever thought there would be a conviction or that it should of went ahead. Shameful really and this of course is an example of a man that got media attention. These accusations happen far more often than will ever be admitted to.

[quote quote=366407]It is one thing to have quotas for traffic offenses, it is quite another to have quotas for Domestic Violence, that is some wacked out s~~~ right there.

I agree if there are quotas on Violence it is wrong. Though I disagree that traffic offenses needing quotas as well.
Should be tossed quotas! I get the an officer works X amount of hours spends so many on the road between calls. He should/would probably see traffic offenses to enforce. But most people are just living their life, or going to work to support their lifestyle. Taxing them isn’t right either.
Personally I have a few a method to assist in determining who deserves a ticket :
– driver gets out of the car starts/tries to poke me in the chest while cursing : TICKET
– female driver has her breasts resting on the window sill (How many times has she been stopped before and this is clearly a tactic to get out of the situation) TICKET
– female driver is crying as I get up to the window and identify myself (again how many times has she done this before as a tactic – return to the window with the ticket as soon as she sees it looses her s~~~ starts cursing [if one tactic doesn’t work they try another – remember when you see tears look for the snot, you can fake tears you cant fake snot!) TICKET
– Driver is respectful and since I conducted the stop they aren’t committing any offences now. NO TICKET

*** I’ll stop taking us off topic now – though hope this gives some hope there are officers out there that see there is a manipulation of the system they swore to uphold and doing their part****

[Anonymous 6]

Lex wrote:

TE Rate this

Lex

Participant
36
Dolla_DD wrote:

Awesome post man, good to see you see right through the waterworks I have seen so many times when these girls want to get something. I personally had a friend, shes hot as hell, drove her car off the road drunk into a ditch…she turned on the show..got off everything, not even a ticket..imagine a guy did this..wow.

Ya during the trial I actually thought about the newer movie Frankenstein when the mob was trying to kill him with pitchforks and torches, basically that’s what the front of the courthouse!!

[Anonymous 25]

narwhal wrote:

If there is reason to believe their was abuse, right? You aren’t suggesting men blindly accuse police just to get revenge or something of that nature, are you?

No, so that there is a proper and full independent investigation, which is what I said.

The points I refer to in my second email are sufficient evidence on which to base such an allegation.

If the police don’t want the lawyers making such properly arguable allegations and advising men to make such complaints, then the police should think twice before they do things like arrest innocent men walking through train stations and putting men in the criminal justice system even where they is evidence he is the victim. Or if it does happen, the police should take it more seriously and do something about it.

They only have themselves to blame, if they hadn’t have acted like that, then it would now not be properly arguable to accuse them of persecuting men to achieve sexual favours, but it is properly arguable. That’s democracy. If the police aren’t held accountable and complaints made, that’s how we end up in a situation like we are now with widespread feminist corruption.

If the police don’t want such complaints to be made, they will have to properly investigate crimes in the first place and stop trying to fit up men to achieve feminist quotas.

[Author]

Posts