Feminist Didn’t Like My Response To Her Threat of Governments Taxing Single Men

[Anonymous 2]

I was arguing with this feminist bitch yesterday and told her that marriage decline is going to continue as more men are walking up, and the gravy train for women is going to crash into the mountain sooner than she thinks. What was her response to this?

“If men refuse to get married, then governments will simply tax single men for being single. Several countries have already discussed it. Like it or not, you men will be forced to take part in the system one way or another.”

Time to hit her with some cold truth. I said:

“I hate to break this to you, but if you imposed such a system on men, the increasing number of western countries legalizing gay marriage allows men a way to circumvent that system. Marriage is nothing but a legal document. I could marry a male friend of mine and we could simply go on with our separate lives like nothing ever happened. There’s no law saying that a married couple needs to live together or have any kind of a sexual relationship. Then neither of us would have to worry about having heavier taxes levied on us, and we’d both get to keep our money and assets.”

You should have seen her face drop! She had this look of “Holy s~~~! I never even thought about that!” That shut her the f~~~ up real quick!

It’s great when you can now use the system to turn around and f~~~ women over, especially when they have been using it to f~~~ us over for so long. The female gravy train is coming to an end!

[RASmanParticipant 1994]

Brilliant.

[TuneoutParticipant]

Nice, but I still can’t see a ‘bachelor’ tax becoming
law.
It is discriminatory in nature and would never hold up under a legal human rights challenge.

It is freedom of choice to be single and no governing body can make you pay for that,otherwise it is freedom bought at a price,sort of like slaves of old.

The Liberal establishment is just getting desperate and grasping at straws.

One method I could see going through however is a lower tax bracket for married couples,especially with kids.

Sort of an incentive to get married and produce future tax payers.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Anonymous 42]

Another MGTOW checkmate!

This chess tournament is kick-ass! You guys ROCK!

[The_Mad_PirateParticipant 1278]

Goverment ( wich literally means ‘to control the mind’ ) can’t and won’t tax the financial market. Everything you gain from stock, bonds. Or exchange market, you keep it. What you gain from bitcoin exchamge market , state can’t tax it.

"We didn't start the fire. It was always burning. Since the world's been turning" "A world that vilifies men only breeds a generation of men that feel no empathy towards women" “In a woman’s mind , there is really no such thing as a ‘we’. In her eyes, earth allways revolves around her, not the other way around. So thinking that your needs , aspirations or desires are valid enough to be persued, or even that you are entitled achive such goals, is like asking your boss for a pay rise in your very first day at the job.”

[AttonParticipant]

The female gravy train is coming to an end!

Slowly but surely, either way it will take centuries.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 11]

Anonymous wrote:

I was arguing with this feminist bitch yesterday

+1 for that.

Is it not ironic how allowing gay marriage can be wielded against the forces of gynocracy?

I don’t get where people say being single is cheaper. Have you ever noticed when you grocery shopping how expensive smaller portions are? I cringe at the food I toss due to spoilage.

I pay school taxes to create illiterate thugs. Our school board is agitating for more money to help disadvantaged students. I’m thinking eliminating the incentives and rewards for being a bastard baby maker would be much more effective.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Excellent. When women think they have men cornered, they end up shooting themselves in the foot.

Anonymous wrote:

“you men will be forced to take part in the system one way or another.”

That’s a woman for you. Can’t get a man to WANT to marry or live with her, so it’s threats and force, and she’s got no problem with that. Don’t want to live with her anymore? “Cut off his dick! He deserves it ha ha!”. That’s not even an exaggeration.

“Like it or not, you men will be forced to take part in the system one way or another.”

“It doesn’t work like that, bitch. If I don’t like it, I walk away from it. Including you. And there is not a goddam thing you can do about it. Like this.”

Then exit.

Only a fascist bitch would force someone to be involved with her “like it or not”. Whoever put this in their c~~~ing heads needs an earful from a man.

“Like it or not. You will take part in this one way or another! Or I’ll violently beat you.”

Women have made the concept of a marriage contract / living with them / dating / cohabitation SO unappealing that a man would have to be INSANE to take part in that…. and they STILL think they are justified in using force, screaming, threats, and all that fake superiority – “like it or not”.

They have over-leveraged and are now done.

“Like it or not. You will take part in this one way or another!”

“Is that a proposal? Where’s the ring? It had better be NICE. Minimum 5 carats and up. Then, when you have brought that ring to me, you may KEEL DOWN at my feet and ask me for permission to ALLOW you to love me until death. Until that day, don’t even f~~~ing speak to me about it.”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[AttonParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

Excellent. When women think they have men cornered, they end up shooting themselves in the foot.

Murph wrote:

“you men will be forced to take part in the system one way or another.”

That’s a woman for you. Can’t get a man to WANT to marry or live with her, so it’s threats and force, and she’s got no problem with that. Don’t want to live with her anymore? “Cut off his dick! He deserves it ha ha!”. That’s not even an exaggeration.

“Like it or not, you men will be forced to take part in the system one way or another.”

“It doesn’t work like that, bitch. If I don’t like it, I walk away from it. Including you. And there is not a goddam thing you can do about it. Like this.”

Then exit.

Only a fascist bitch would force someone to be involved with her “like it or not”. Whoever put this in their c~~~ing heads needs an earful from a man.

The funny thing is men are the system, men acting in their interests act, in the interests of all men. Thus the system works for men and men first.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[xenonParticipant 2007]

Certainly the best clip from that vile stupid show I have ever seen. One will always reap just exactly what one sows. Vile filth begets vile filth.

[aeragoanParticipant 1186]

Don’t threaten me of taxing..I am single man..If i can help in building the system..I know 100 ways to destroy the rigged system..All feminazi will be getting is my dogs poop

[foghornleghornParticipant 3449]

Thinking things through to their logical conclusion is not a woman’s strong suit. They are all under the impression that men are hypnotized by the pussy and everything they claim is based on that one belief. Which is why when they run into MGTOW, they cannot fathom it or understand it. To them the only reason a guy is MGHOW is because he is a loser who is a virgin etc etc.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Anonymous wrote:

Like it or not, you men will be forced to take part in the system one way or another.”

Murph-
Kudos for a brilliant response.
These bitches can’t make men do anything. There are a million ways to circumvent the system.
To bad sweetheart.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

What suprises me is that she thinks men have some sort of obligation to be in a relationship.

We have no obligations to society at all beyond paying our own way in life.

[Total LeeParticipant 1573]

Feminists are so mentally ill they actually think a man would sign up to get slapped. That, and lesbianism, is the only human contact they can get.

[BreakTheChainsParticipant 56]

Way to smack her down!

I read a lengthy post the other day, something that may have been posted here on the forums at some point, about what would happen if men didn’t show up for work today .

Admittedly, I expected a load of claptrap garbage since the post was from a site called judgybitch.com, but what I read was very interesting. In a nut shell, women would be f~~~ed if we didn’t show up. The writer presented all of the facts based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics for 2013.
It is worth a read if you have the time.

Basically, this is what the writer determined:

It is women who have failed to earn their privileges. We live in a world powered and created and maintained by men, and yet feminists have created a whole philosophy and ideology that insists women and men are equal.

We are not equal.

We do not need to be equal.

What we can be is grateful.

And we can pray men never, ever take a day off.

[narwhalParticipant]

The government isn’t near doing anything like a direct bachelor tax. There present strategy works a heck of a lot better in favoring women over men. Why change strategies when you can simply just increase the benefits to women that have been ‘working’ for decades?

The fact of the matter is that women own children. If a man is a father or married to a woman, then said woman owns him. Increasing the benefits and tax breaks for children while raising taxes overall will accomplish pretty much the same thing as bachelor tax. Gay marriage will not be a loophole here.

Women fail to recognize what is sexist since the lack perspective due to too much focus on themselves. The also lack the ability to recognize and close loopholes. The government, is neither of these.

Ok. Then do it.

[experiencedParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

Only a fascist bitch would force…”

hillary

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[the roadParticipant 3125]

Well done Murph.

If something like a direct bachelor tax ever came into existence I would definitely use a loophole like the one you suggested.

#MANOUT

[RoyDalParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

If men refuse to get married, then governments will simply tax single men for being single.

Caesar Augustus implemented a bachelor tax back in whatever-B.C. (The tax was on nobles. Nobody cared what commoners did.)

The tax caused a flurry of sham marriages and other work arounds, not unlike a famous Hollywood star marrying a hot babe to hide the fact that he is a closeted homosexual.

narwhal wrote:

The government isn’t near doing anything like a direct bachelor tax. There present strategy works a heck of a lot better in favoring women over men. Why change strategies when you can simply just increase the benefits to women that have been ‘working’ for decades?

Right on. Welfare single mother and child support is something no confirmed bachelor can escape, as long as he pays his income tax. Pay he will, because the government has platoons of guys with badges and guns at its beck and call.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Author]

Posts