Feminist admits the wage gap is bulls~~~

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

uchibenkei wrote:

When anybody tries to argue that, I destroy them.

EDIT: Dammit I really need to start reading through the whole thread. Sidecar nailed it first.

That’s the real reason this chick is admitting it’s bulls~~~. Someone verbally boned her hard when she regurgitated it and she saw how big of a weakness it really was and how compromising it is.

She isn’t one of the more rational ones, she is trying to adapt the arguments to cover and avoid the weakness so the female supremacy can march on less challenged. Like a girl realizing she has a torn dress trying to change the dress instead of losing the f~~~ing weight.

[sidecarParticipant 35874]

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t get the point of keeping manginas around anymore than I see keeping women around.

Because there’s still hope a mangina can be saved. Leave no man behind.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t get it, why are those two words used together in a sentence without some form of negation?

I hear you man, but the bottom line is I’m not going to throw away a 17 year friendship just because I’ve opened my eyes and he hasn’t yet.

Now you can bet your ass that if I meet a mangina tomorrow, I’m not going to have any desire to spend time with him and make friends, but this guy… well he could still come to the realization and I can do more to support that as his friend than I could by kicking him to the kerb.

[kizellParticipant 368]

I’ve never really understood the 77 cent logic thing.

Although we know it’s not true, let’s assume for a moment that it is true.

Since the government does not set wages, only the marketplace determines pay. So feminists must be implying that the entire market is anti woman.

If this is not what they are trying to imply, then what are they implying. The only other possible explanation does not fit their narrative….because they are worth less.

The market should always determine your pay because if government mandated equal pay, we would see an infusion of sorriness in this country the likes of which we have never seen.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

kizell wrote:

So feminists must be implying that the entire market is anti woman.

If this is not what they are trying to imply, then what are they implying.

I think they’re implying that because they are less able – they are at a disadvantage -> they’re victims of birth lottery. But because equality – they should be paid the same as men regardless of the fact they’re worse employees than men.
So if a man is an engineer but it’s too hard for a woman to be an engineer – she should be making the same paycheck as an engineer but for easier work – say answering phones. That’s how they see equality.
Pure marxism

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Author]

Posts