Feminism=Polygamy

[ether_oreParticipant 29]

Being MGTOW myself and of the variety that believes in sexual abstinence for religious reasons, I see an ironic situation taking shape. Feminism seems to be on the path to polygamy. Several factors are contributing to this trend which is only in its beginning stages. I think women’s desires are developing into something looking like this: feminism = socialism = forced dominance by elitists = hive mind = necessitated polygamy. Sure, I know what you’re thinking… I’m nuts and this will never happen. I’M only suggesting that it’s a plausible outcome. Going from feminism to socialism is no big leap. The two go hand in hand because if women will not be dependent on husbands, they will necessarily be dependent on government. And… forced dominance by elitists is what socialism is all about. With feminism being dominant in this particular socialist model, you have a hive mind that seeks to relegate men to irrelevance. Add to this the voluntary decision of some men to go MGTOW and this creates a situation where there will likely be fewer men to perform any service for women, which means several women dependent on one man for sex. By definition, polygamy means a man having more than one “wife”, as in… ‘married’. However, in the scenario I’ve described, the result is the same; the marriage issue notwithstanding. I could be wrong. After all women do not “need” individualized attention or affection. They can turn it on or off at will.

[VileNordParticipant 766]

You definitely made some giant leaps there! I think that if anything, a socialist society controlled by an elitist group of feminists wouldn’t care one iota about a man identifying as a MGHOW and would pass legislation that enforces him to toe their line under threat of imprisonment. A feminist controlled society would rape a man of all his dignity and harvest his utility for the benefit of womenkind. If polygamy exists in this hypothetical dystopia, it would be a women with a harem of males, each fulfilling a particular need she had. One for sex, one for complaining, one for listening, one for shopping, etc…

This will never happen though. Men have a vast edge in too many areas of life to allow women to get that far. We would of course rebel and they would suffer tremendous casualties.

Lust for comfort suffocates the soul

[ether_oreParticipant 29]

@vilenord

From my perspective, I think you’re making my point in some ways. For one thing, precedence concerning enforced parentage has been set by women themselves over the issue of abortion. This would make it difficult for them to do an about face on the issue of sovereignty over one’s own body. You could be right about enforcement of involuntary servitude, but you also, yourself suggest that this won’t happen because men won’t allow it to happen. My point was only this: that as long as individual autonomy exists at some basic level, men will be less and less inclined to submit to a relationship with women which has no tangible benefit for men. Couple this with a sufficient number of men respecting the autonomy of women and you have a condition that resembles what I described.

[TheBardParticipant 974]

I could picture feminists promoting multiple husbands for all females so they get more money, more choices for sex, and keep men down. Men like us wouldn’t fall for it, but there is no shortage of pathetic men who would fall for this and let it happen because having to share pussy with 5 other guys, but knowing he will get at least once every week would be good enough for him. Feminism and socialism do seem a lot alike though as in both involve getting taken care of and women would love to use their bodies to make men take care of them. I am sure all of those hardcore feminists imagine a society where all they do is relax all day and have fun while men go to work and better themselves for a chance to be one of their husbands and get pussy when the woman needs to use it as a weapon.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

I have also noticed the rise in polygamy and marveled at a video on some “Anderson Cooper” show (i think)… where a woman had a very pathetic “beta” weakling for all the “support” she needed … and a more “alpha” dude to get the job done in the bedroom. I shuddered at the men who were accepting of this, particularly the studio audience who didn’t say “boo” about it. What a bunch of hypocrites!! When you know that a man will two “wives” would be booed off the stage before he opened his mouth.

The glaring reality is that women today use men to fill certain specific holes in their lives and play certain roles. The gay best friend is there to help boost her self-esteem and take her to the mall to tell her how “faaaabulous” she looks. The husband quietly pays for everything and never pesters her for sex. The boyfriend on-the-sly gives her the ‘gina tingles. And her 400 other male Facebook “friends” are there to “like” everything she posts… and are the back up plan in case one of these “relationships” doesn’t work out.

Until we can reengineer hypergamy out of women’s hindbrains, advocacy for unconstrained polyamory in all but the most backward societies is DOA. Consensual polyamory is a contrived hookup service for undesirable sexual market rejects.

Everything about that picture – and the concept is revolting.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[TheBardParticipant 974]

<cite>@mgtow.com said:</cite>
I have also noticed the rise in polygamy and marveled at a video on some “Anderson Cooper” show (i think)… where a woman had a very pathetic “beta” weakling for all the “support” she needed … and a more “alpha” dude to get the job done in the bedroom.

All women do that even when choosing what kind of guy to date in different points in their life. This is a scene from a the game Catherine, which every man needs to play, and what Justin says pretty much describes how women treat us men when looking for relationships.

What I take from that is guys like me and the guy who she is marrying are not good enough for women when they are younger. Us nice guys who are loyal, have decent jobs, and aren’t pigs are only good enough when they want to settle down and have kids. We are not good enough back in their college and early post college days because at that age they can deal with a douche bag guy who treats them bad because he works out and will spend money on them since they are young, but now that they are older and don’t want to put up with that crap they think it is ok to move on to guys like us who have always been good, the guys who had to go without for years because we were too nice and good friends. All those nights we could never find dates anywhere because we weren’t assholes,but years later we are the right guys who they didn’t see until now. That would be no different than a guy in college saying to a girl “sorry but your t~~~ are too small for me. I am young and in college, I want a girl with huge t~~~” then 8 years later coming back to that girl and saying “please date me, that was college me who only liked girls with big t~~~ and I was young back then, you understand?”

[McQueenParticipant 77]

Cool find in the media, Bard. I know so many girls like that, but don’t be calling other guys “pigs” for getting the pussay. She threw it at them, remember? The pigs are the bishes who come after you when you just figured them out. These women make me sick. Its like they have not even thought about it for 2 seconds, or feel bad or embarrassed about it.

They never took a minute to think “I didn’t want to dance with this guy in school” or “He once asked me out and I said no. I shouldn’t expect him to date me now. That’s rude.” This thought doesn’t enter their minds. They should be ashamed of themselves and should come crawling on all fours and saying “I was so stupid to pass you up you were good to me when other guys weren’t. Is there any way I can make it up to you?” but pigs will fly before a woman thinks like that. Even when they are desperate and their eggs are drying up, they maintain the same distance “hey remember me? Call me!”. Try again sister. You can start by begging me to let you blow me.

[TheBardParticipant 974]

No one should ever give that kind of girl a second chance ever. Pretty convenient on their end that they got to have things their way back in college and now that they are older they just happen to realize their mistakes when they meet you again and their eggs are dying. If a woman will not date you when you are younger then you should date her when you are older.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Add to this the voluntary decision of some men to go MGTOW and this creates a situation where there will likely be fewer men to perform any service for women, which means several women dependent on one man for sex.

I think most men can’t keep up with multiple women, not for a long time anyways. You would need to have gifted genetics and be in very good health to last a long time. Unless you’re young a man can not sex daily when he is required to work. Also STD will probably on the rise, it’s a bad.

Personally I do not care what women do. I wouldn’t have sex with just any woman anyways.

Let’s Talk Sex: Why Too Much and Too Little is Unhealthy! http://www.losethebackpain.com/healthysex.html

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[TheBardParticipant 974]

<cite>@crazycanuck said:</cite>
http://www.losethebackpain.com/healthysex.html

Too bad I don’t have a girlfriend. I could easily do the 2x a day for good health lol. My health doesn’t look too good than if not having sex gives you all those symptoms lol.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

I have also noticed the rise in polygamy and marveled at a video on some “Anderson Cooper” show (i think)… where a woman had a very pathetic “beta” weakling for all the “support” she needed … and a more “alpha” dude to get the job done in the bedroom. I shuddered at the men who were accepting of this, particularly the studio audience who didn’t say “boo” about it. What a bunch of hypocrites!! When you know that a man will two “wives” would be booed off the stage before he opened his mouth.

The glaring reality is that women today use men to fill certain specific holes in their lives and play certain roles. The gay best friend is there to help boost her self-esteem and take her to the mall to tell her how “faaaabulous” she looks. The husband quietly pays for everything and never pesters her for sex. The boyfriend on-the-sly gives her the ‘gina tingles. And her 400 other male Facebook “friends” are there to “like” everything she posts… and are the back up plan in case one of these “relationships” doesn’t work out.

I’m just now getting around to reading some older postings on the site here… excellent thoughts, KeyMaster. That’s why they pay you the tall dollars, right?

I’ve mentioned her before but I know a young female who is in a “polyamorous” relationship. She’s with this older guy who she seems to be emptionally compatible with but is free to engage in romantic and sexual activity with other men of her choosing with his permission but without his involvement. The only three rules they’ve agreed on, that I can determine, are no sex without condoms (smart), no sleep-overs (fine with me) and her asshole belongs to him alone (something’s gotta be sacred, right?).

This female is young, cute, artistic and fun to be around… not really my type in terms of intellectual capacity or attitude, more of a hippy chick than I usually like, but she’s pretty and has a nice body so sure, I’m game. We’ve had sex twice now and I have to say that I’m not really feeling it. The whole polyamory thing just isn’t working for me.

What do you guys think? Polyamorous relationship good, indifferent, bad? Is this just loser guys willing to play second or third string just to be on the team and I’m right for expecting females to be able to commit to one man or is this a beneficial adaptation that selects for females with qualities that are valuable in modern society and I’m just a fossil-to-be waiting to fall into some mud?

[AussieBlokeParticipant 144]

Stargazer wrote:

What do you guys think? Polyamorous relationship good, indifferent, bad? Is this just loser guys willing to play second or third string just to be on the team and I’m right for expecting females to be able to commit to one man or is this a beneficial adaptation that selects for females with qualities that are valuable in modern society and I’m just a fossil-to-be waiting to fall into some mud?

Hi Doc, Poly amorous relationships depend on your position in them.

For me, I never got a whole lot of sex throughout my life, (at least it never seemed enough!) so for me if I was the occasional outsider that was just there for a young woman to have sex with – great – no problem. If I was the one she was “Compatible” with? f~~~ that, I’ve never been compatible with any woman I’ve been with, and that too often leads to financially supporting them as well.

The harder the fight the sweeter the victory

[RoyDalParticipant]

I caught an STD from a GF who practiced polyandry, although it caught me by surprise. I didn’t know about the ‘poly’ part. Luckily, the STD was cured by modern medicine.

I read somewhere they used to practice polyandry in Tibet, so I looked it up. Wikipedia just informed me it is far more widespread than I ever imagined.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 11]

I had one of the cast of loons that I’ve dated over the years try the open relationship stunt with me right at the 3 month crazy gate.  She literally embarrassed the hell out of me in public trying to pick up a bartender as we waited at the bar for a table to open.  She asked me to “Let her have just one”.  I let her have it with both barrels and just walked away.

I don’t know what if anything happened later with them, but the bartender gave me a free stiff drink.  I had to trick the bitch into thinking she dumped me as she stalked me hard for a week afterwards and then off and on for the next 6 months.  She was a hardcore feminist too.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

I see it more as a prostitution trust. They all ban together to control the supply of sex. At least, the idea that you could get sex. Unless you’re rich and tall, you’re not getting any sex at all, but you do get to pay for the privileged lifestyles of the women and the men they have for sex.

[Author]

Posts