Feminism was created/promoted to destabilize society and as a control tool

Topic by Christopher

Christopher

Home Forums MGTOW Central Feminism was created/promoted to destabilize society and as a control tool

This topic contains 12 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Ghost  ghost 2 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #686828
    +7
    Christopher
    Christopher
    Participant
    2478

    Interesting video of Aaron Russo describing how feminism was funded by the Rockefellers as part of a larger plan.

    Imo females are too irrational to be allowed vote. It goes deeper though. Feminism is a tool of a larger control structure that does not change just because someone is elected. The power lies behind in the top echelons of the international central banking system and the power structures of globalisation. The monetary system is part of all this. You may be familiar with the quote from Rothschild: “Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws”. Debt money (the loans/mortages most of us have incurred) is created from ‘nothing’ by the fractional reserve banking system yet you are required to pay it back plus interest. Feminism, gynocentrism, marriage, divorce and are all tools that are promoted in this system in order to destabilise traditional family values; keep men working and under control to pay money for marriage/divorce/alimony; and generate more tax by getting women to work. In this system the traditional family unit is viewed as a hindrance as in economic terms men (and the women that work) are simply units of productivity and debt slaves. Meanwhile a small elite become incredibly rich from the interest earned from hundreds of millions of people in the global debt system, government bailouts and other mechanisms. 50% of the worlds wealth is owned by around 100 people.

    As MGTOW I try to avoid all that nonsense.

    Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

    #686865
    +4
    Handsome Vic
    Handsome Vic
    Participant
    1613

    Personally, I am skeptical of “feminism as a conspiracy theory”.

    Feminist achievements were incremental over decades. The right to vote. Equal pay for equal work. Representation in the workplace. Recognition of the unpaid contributions of mothers.

    Today, with fundamental equality arguably met a long time ago, feminism has become about (1) fighting fringe issues — Manspreading, mansplaining, rape culture hysteria, etc. And, (2) moving past equality to entrench female privilege and the corresponding financial enslavement of men (preferential treatment, excessive benefits, male criminalization).

    Now, with big daddy government enlisted, feminism will bloat until the whole thing costs too much to sustain and it collapses on itself.

    I think women are beginning to wake up to the effects of their choices. It used to be easy and noble for women to stay at home and raise a family. A man could work and support his family on one salary. But women wanted to get into the workforce en masse. OK, now we have twice as many workers in the workforce — so wages are driven down. Women discover that working life is s~~~. Women put off having children and family until their mid-30s when they are post-wall. The available men are fearful of marriage; some are already rinsed once or twice in divorce. Then it’s “Where have all the good men gone?” So they get bitter that they have to get back to work, or be poor.

    Seems to me it would have been faster and more lucrative for the Rothschilds or whoever to have lobbied to bring in loads of immigrant workers. Or to set up from the start in countries where the conditions were more favourable. Why try to incrementally influence society over generations, with no guarantee of success?

    Occam’s razor. I don’t think there is any one sinister hand guiding feminism.

    I'm going my own way. Maybe I'll see you there.

    #686869
    Ghost
    ghost
    Participant

    I don’t buy it. Rockefeller was born poor and worked his way to the top. He wasn’t born “elite”. Andrew Carnegie was a poor immigrant. Shahid Khan, Larry Ellison and Jack Ma are some recent ones. If they can do it, why not us?

    We live in a commercial world. There are very few tangible things. Time, health/energy and money. Figure out which one of these you have the least of and focus on improving it. Find your balance.

    #686871
    +3
    Antipathy
    Antipathy
    Participant
    4901

    I would advise all men who can afford to, buy an RV like John from MGTOW. He got tired of paying property taxes, moved into a nice 5th wheel, and pays the lot owner a few hundred dollars a month to let him stay there.

    #686967
    +3
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    And for that I’m grateful.

    Thanks feminism for letting us know the real face of women.

    Is easier to run away from a monster you can see,

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #687164
    +1
    Sjt1975
    sjt1975
    Participant
    2536

    Feminism has made me see women for what they really are. Too bad that Feminism is causing societal collapse/instability. No pussy will be controlling me. Shame!!!

    #687246
    Christopher
    Christopher
    Participant
    2478

    I agree with much of the reply posts
    Although I agree I dont think their there is ‘one sinister hand’ guiding feminism. Nevertheless, there are worldwide ‘structures’ in place that support it whether it be in your Local schoool/ education system or in the United Nations – I think there is an element of:

    1. Feminism being ‘convenient’ for the current neo-orthodox economic system which aims to increase GDP, production, tax revenues

    2. Instances where Feminism has been pro-actively promoted as indicated in the Aaron Russo video above

    I would not call it a conspiracy either. Nevertheless, it seems apparent that around the world legal, political and social systems have taken a ‘direction’ in line with 1st, 2nd, and 3rd wave feminism and thus infringed on mens rights and freedoms. Maybe Im wrong but I dont think this can be fully explained only by female nature/psychology.

    Thats just the way I currently observe it – im not going to spend any more time thinking about it + I dont see any point in wasting energy fighting it as such – imho such a flawed system will sooner or later collapse unsustainably.

    MGTOW going our own way is the solution.

    Peace.

    Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

    #687318
    Doc
    Doc
    Participant

    Vic nailes it. Nothing else worth adding other than modern women take things to very imaginative levels.

    The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

    #687327
    +1
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    Can’t argue with the points the man was making, weather or not the Rockefeller family had a direct hand in the foundation. Feminism has destabilize society. Central bank, other issues.

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    #687332
    +1
    Ghost
    ghost
    Participant

    Feminism has destabilize society.

    Yes, it has destabilized society. No argument there.

    #687361
    +4
    Monk
    Monk
    Participant
    16977

    Personally, I am skeptical of “feminism as a conspiracy theory”. [….] Occam’s razor. I don’t think there is any one sinister hand guiding feminism.

    Documents produced by Bilderberg, CFR, Trilateral Commission, Carlyle Group and so on make their agenda plain. There’s really no secret – it’s just a question of looking.

    Subversives have always championed ‘womens rights’.

    Why?

    Women work on feelz, not facts. They can be manipulated by anyone who promises them a fairytale paradise.

    Are they capable of organising all this chaos? Take a look at ‘feminists’, at what they do and how they behave.

    The answer has to be No. The are useful idiots, nothing more. They are not the brains behind Feminism.

    #687614
    +3

    Anonymous
    14

    I don’t think it’s a coincidence that at around the same time they removed gold completely from backing the dollar they also were pushing Third Wave Feminism really hard.

    Inflation due to unchecked money printing and no intention of wages keeping up with inflation meant the everyman was no longer going to be able to raise a family on his paycheck alone. So? Women were going to have to work, why not make them think it was their idea?

    I believe Social Engineering is a real thing, and if you pay close enough attention to things it all becomes clear as day.

    #687766
    Ghost
    ghost
    Participant

    Handsome Vic

    Please fix your signature. You need to close the italics code. It is causing every thread you comment on to become italicized. I already sent you a PM regarding this.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.