Female vs. Male desire; society shames men, supports female sexual aggression

Topic by Smacktalk73

Smacktalk73

Home Forums MGTOW Central Female vs. Male desire; society shames men, supports female sexual aggression

This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by BrainPilot  BrainPilot 4 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #20084
    +1
    Smacktalk73
    Smacktalk73
    Participant
    296

    Watch these two videos, and think about the incredible double standard society has with regard to females “taking what they want” in terms of sex, and males doing the same thing.

    First, here is a middle-aged woman molesting John Stamos (after having met him only seconds before) by sucking on his face: Funny, right?

    Now, here is an Indian man being publicly shamed for, apparently, touching a woman who was sitting next to him.  Not kissing her; not reaching up her skirt, or pinching her.  Just letting his hand slide across their seat divider and touch her:

    In our civilization, nothing is more shameful or evil than unwanted, reciprocated male attempts at expressing sexual desire.  And yet MALES ARE EXPECTED TO MAKE THE FIRST MOVE in these things.  Whenever a female does make the first move, everyone cheers, because she’s taken a risk, and gone outside her comfort zone.  But if male makes a sexual move, he risks becoming a criminal as part of the rejection process.  And yet, he is the one expected to make the first move — if he doesn’t , he’s not a man.

    It is a dizzyingly horrible double standard we all just accept.

    #20113
    +2

    But, if a man doesn’t make the first move, he’s classified as a wimp or worse.

     

    #20146
    +1
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    This is consistent with the recent story about the European country (Sweden?) that just decriminalized prostitution for female prostitutes, but specifically kept it illegal for their male customers. A prostitute can offer a man sex for money and she’s done nothing illegal. If a man accepts this offer, he’s a criminal.

    If it’s the man who makes the offer, he’s still a criminal wether she accepts or not. But if she does accept, she’s done nothing illegal.

    Someone comes to me with stated intent to commit a criminal act, but is unable to do so without my complicity. The agreement to comply is a conspiracy (separate crime), but only one party of the conspiracy has committed a crime…? WTF?

    To Sweden: Either make prostitution illegal, or legalize it. But make up your damn mind…

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.