Female Students Are More Pro-Censorship Than Male Students.

[Darth SinParticipant 576]

The picture / news article is self explanatory. Once again, its AWALT and men should not not ever expect or rely on women to stand up for freedom.

[ConstantineParticipant 4420]

Mm-hmm.

They should just say that female students are more likely to ruin everybody’s day, full-stop.

They seem to delight in causing problems for everyone. As an added bonus, every new “problem” that’s brought to light is guaranteed to contradict a previous one. It seems to be inherent in the female gene to say one thing and then do another.

I mean, the fact that women support censorship just confirms something that I’ve long suspected. You know how women are always bitching that movies constantly feature naked women, but never – or rarely – naked men?

It drives me nuts when I hear some douchebag saying, “Let men be objectified in cinema for a change. Women are subjected to that trend ten times more.” (As if that’s a real figure.) Never mind if men are constantly beaten up or killed in said movies, the fact that a female character appears in a bikini has to stop. Well, the fact that more women are pro-censorship doesn’t quite sit with this. It’s demonstrated the second that a man does appear naked in a film: the theatre will be full of “Put some clothes on!” shouts.

Hypocrisy, thy name is woman.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[RhinoParticipant 3477]

Love this part of the article

“While the majority of students think you should never limit free speech in principle, they are considerably less supportive in practice”.

Mr. Hillman suggested that the gender difference could be attributed to women being more likely to study arts and humanities subjects. “The concept of a trigger warning is a more obvious thing in a English literature lesson than a Physics class,” he said.

They are churning them out at a young age all the way up to college and I can’t wait for the house of cards they built to come crashing down around them. We will be on the other side pointing and laughing at their stupidity and of course they will be yelling for us to fix their mess.

[chirParticipant]

60% of college students are women. Should we just start handing out “Brownshirts” for all of them now or wait till they start shouting “Seig Heil”.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Rhino wrote:

Love this part of the article

“While the majority of students think you should never limit free speech in principle, they are considerably less supportive in practice”.

Mr. Hillman suggested that the gender difference could be attributed to women being more likely to study arts and humanities subjects. “The concept of a trigger warning is a more obvious thing in a English literature lesson than a Physics class,” he said.

They are churning them out at a young age all the way up to college and I can’t wait for the house of cards they built to come crashing down around them. We will be on the other side pointing and laughing at their stupidity and of course they will be yelling for us to fix their mess.

and wtf is a “trigger warning”?

and as Chir says – this is where dictator ships come from although I don’t think women deliberately want it to happen but are just too thick to see the outcome down the line

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

It’s the natural progression of the useful idiot project.

All seems to be going well and ahead of schedule.

Femtards

[TaxGuyParticipant]

I think I was about 4 or 5 when I first heard the saying “Stick and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me.” Words are just words. Why censor someone? Let them talk so you see just how stupid they are.

Now people need a safe space because they are so hurt by words.

For those of us in the USA, read the Constitution again. The first amendment is freedom of speech, because the Founding Fathers couldn’t get together to complain about what the King was doing to them. They wanted to make sure that people had the right to get together and talk, no matter the topic.

The second amendment gives us the right to bear arms. That is specifically there to make sure that the people had the ability to overthrow their own government if it got out of hand. Basically gives teeth to the First Amendment.

The third amendment keeps the government from illegal search and seizure. Basically they can’t come into you house unannounced to see if you have any anti-government propaganda, which would be allowed under the First Amendment.

The First Amendment gives us the right to freedom of speech and the next two are the protection of that right. The Founding Fathers apparently thought freedom of speech was kind of a big deal.

Political correctness, safe spaces, Mansplaining…. This will be the death of our country. Just another way to take away free speech. Bullying to get what you want and shame anyone who dare challenge the new norm.

Don’t be shocked when one day it is met with sticks and stones…..

Order the good wine

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

This is why i ditched university 2 months ago.
I can no longer stomach those evil sacks of s~~~.

[Author]

Posts