Female Remakes of movies

Topic by Silverstone the Second

Silverstone the Second

Home Forums MGTOW Central Female Remakes of movies

This topic contains 13 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by TaxGuy  TaxGuy 3 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #274922
    +9

    I feel like this Ghostbusters thing will be the first of many. You can already see media being remade with female characters. It’s a s~~~ show as far as I care, but it got me thinking.

    We all know men are leaders and women are followers. Men make the first step, we do it first, we adopt new technology and women are followers. They get into it after men have already done it. See computers and social media, cell phones, everything. Men are early adopters and creators and so on. ANYWAY.

    You ever notice that the pinnacle for these women is copying and imitating men? Men are in the work force being the bread winners, now women want to do that. Men make movies, now women want to that. Men chase women and have casual sex, now women want that too.

    For all their f~~~ing talk, women want to copy men, in everything. Now it’s come to movies. Why not come up with your own intellectual property? Why not stand on your own two legs? Because women can’t f~~~ing do it. They had to wait for men to test the waters and once it’s safe, then they jump in. Except then you end up with s~~~ like ghostbusters. That’s why men will always be ahead. Because we take the initiative, we take the risks, and women come by later with too little too late and try to be just like men.

    I want you all to keep that in mind, fellas. When women talk s~~~ about men, keep in mind that they think we are s~~~ty human beings that are inferior to them, and yet they emulate EVERYTHING WE DO. Keep that in mind the next time some feminist c~~~ shoots her mouth off about how bad and evil men are, while she’s actively imitating everything that we do.

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

    #274928
    +5
    Mister Man Smith
    Mister Man Smith
    Participant
    285

    I feel like this Ghostbusters thing will be the first of many.

    It tanked financially, doesn’t matter what kind of agenda they wanna push.
    Frankly I only think they agreed to do it because the internet is loud with feminists, so they thought it might sell.

    On the other hand look at non-PC Deadpool, it made an absolute KILLING in the box office, money talks, feminists might be loud but people wanna pay for something that isn’t bulls~~~.

    If anything I’d say we’ll see even more non-PC movies and the studios will just tell the haters (which are the few) to shut the f~~~ up so they can sell movies to the majority of people.

    mistermansmithmgtow.blogspot.com

    #274931
    +3
    Unicron
    Unicron
    Participant
    752

    Ghostc~~~ers wasn’t the first,

    Mad Max 4,

    Three musketeers,

    Farce awakens,

    The Hunger Games

    and Million Dollar Baby are just some of the all female remakes to come out over the last 15 years.

    Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

    #274935
    +5
    TaxGuy
    TaxGuy
    Participant

    Can they do an all female remake of Saving Private Ryan or Full Metal Jacket? Any WWII movie?

    Let’s see how strange and uncomfortable it is for society to watch a movie where women get their heads blown off for 2 straight hours.

    Order the good wine

    #274944
    +2
    Mister Man Smith
    Mister Man Smith
    Participant
    285

    Can they do an all female remake of Saving Private Ryan or Full Metal Jacket? Any WWII movie?

    Just let this sink in…

    Battlefield 1 doesn’t have female soldiers because ‘boys wouldn’t find it believable’
    Battlefield 1 is primed to shake up the online shooter genre with a surprisingly vibrant and colorful look at the First World War. Yet there’s one area Battlefield 1 still resembles its previous games: no female soldiers.

    Battlefield 1 doesn’t have female soldiers because ‘boys wouldn’t find it believable’

    In that article, written by Marshall Lemon, the magina goes to say women WERE in combat roles in WWI, the blue piller points at wikipedia and everything, because you know, every time you see real WWI footage there’s women all around fighting alongside men…

    So I wouldn’t be surprised to see an all female cast remake of Saving Private Ryan and Full Metal Jacket, maybe big red could play Gunnery Sergeant Hartwomyn.

    mistermansmithmgtow.blogspot.com

    #274945
    +2
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22521

    On the other hand look at non-PC Deadpool, it made an absolute KILLING in the box office, money talks, feminists might be loud but people wanna pay for something that isn’t bulls~~~.

    While playing Deadpool, Ryan Reynolds had the b~~~~ to ask the most important feminist question in an action movie.

    To paraphrase: “In an action movie. Is it more sexist to hit a woman? Or, not hit a woman?”

    And then Deadpool just pulls out a gun to shoot both women whom he was fighting.

    #274998
    +1
    Anthony
    Anthony
    Participant
    2281

    Ghostc~~~ers wasn’t the first,

    And movies such as G.I. Jane, Supergirl, (Superc~~~) female Thor, female “Iron Man” etc.

    Can they do an all female remake of Saving Private Ryan or Full Metal Jacket? Any WWII movie?

    Or how about an all female cast of Expendables, Rocky, Rambo, 300, Braveheart, etc.

    Western media would go completely bats~~~ crazy if they ever made an all female cast of those movies.

    Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

    #275018
    +3
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    Simple vote with your dollars.

    I go see a movie because I could imagine myself as Indy Jones, Iron Man, Mad Max. It is fantasy, escapism.

    Does anyone think I can imagine myself as a female Thor? Nope. So there is no reason to go watch it.

    Make as many flops as you want, my money stay in my pocket.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #275088
    +2
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    Economics will decide the fate of these kind of movies. What women want and what the market wants are two really quite different things. In the field of entertainment men simply out spend women, thus hold the only opinion that matters.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #275119
    +2
    Foghornleghorn
    foghornleghorn
    Participant
    3449

    They are so desperate to have women portrayed as strong. Of course in the real world you see standards getting reduced so that the “strong” woman can actually qualify to work in the fire department or actually be a marine.

    #275173
    Constantine
    Constantine
    Participant
    4416

    They are so desperate to have women portrayed as strong.

    While at the same time, demanding that these “strong” women be treated even nicer than cripples. D’you know how I know that? Because in that raging piece of s~~~ The Dark Knight Rises (I’m sorry guys, I’m sure that many of you probably enjoyed it, but I thought that it was a horrible ending to a really great trilogy), there’s a scene where Selena says to Bruce, “You wouldn’t beat up a woman, any more than I would beat up a cripple.” Excuse me, since when were a woman and a cripple the same thing? And please note how the cripple got beaten up anyway, so now, even violence to cripples is more acceptable than violence to women. Hell, it’s even become acceptable to punch a man with glasses. Anything else is okay as long as it’s not female. Yet they keep ramming us with this claim that they’re “strong”.

    In that article, written by Marshall Lemon, the magina goes to say women WERE in combat roles in WWI,

    Well then Mr. Lemon, the women of WWI were obviously not as oppressed as everybody keeps saying, if they were allowed to be given military roles. See how you’ve just poked a large hole in your cause, the one which claims that women have been s~~~ on for so long?

    For all their f~~~ing talk, women want to copy men, in everything. Now it’s come to movies. Why not come up with your own intellectual property? Why not stand on your own two legs? Because women can’t f~~~ing do it.

    I was just thinking about that the other night. I can’t believe that women expect people to take them seriously when they can’t even come up with their own ideas. After considering Ghostbusters a nerd’s movie for so long, they suddenly decide that they want it. Then they fill it with anti-male crap, despite men being the ones who were clever enough to come up with the idea! It makes my blood boil!

    On the other hand look at non-PC Deadpool, it made an absolute KILLING in the box office, money talks, feminists might be loud but people wanna pay for something that isn’t bulls~~~.

    Wait, Deadpool was non-PC? There was a thread on here about how that one contained feminist garbage aswell.

    To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

    #275190
    Jim01
    Jim01
    Participant
    6678

    They are so desperate to have women portrayed as strong.

    While at the same time, demanding that these “strong” women be treated even nicer than cripples. D’you know how I know that? Because in that raging piece of s~~~ The Dark Knight Rises (I’m sorry guys, I’m sure that many of you probably enjoyed it, but I thought that it was a horrible ending to a really great trilogy), there’s a scene where Selena says to Bruce, “You wouldn’t beat up a woman, any more than I would beat up a cripple.” Excuse me, since when were a woman and a cripple the same thing? And please note how the cripple got beaten up anyway, so now, even violence to cripples is more acceptable than violence to women. Hell, it’s even become acceptable to punch a man with glasses. Anything else is okay as long as it’s not female. Yet they keep ramming us with this claim that they’re “strong”.

    In that article, written by Marshall Lemon, the magina goes to say women WERE in combat roles in WWI,

    Well then Mr. Lemon, the women of WWI were obviously not as oppressed as everybody keeps saying, if they were allowed to be given military roles. See how you’ve just poked a large hole in your cause, the one which claims that women have been s~~~ on for so long?

    For all their f~~~ing talk, women want to copy men, in everything. Now it’s come to movies. Why not come up with your own intellectual property? Why not stand on your own two legs? Because women can’t f~~~ing do it.

    I was just thinking about that the other night. I can’t believe that women expect people to take them seriously when they can’t even come up with their own ideas. After considering Ghostbusters a nerd’s movie for so long, they suddenly decide that they want it. Then they fill it with anti-male crap, despite men being the ones who were clever enough to come up with the idea! It makes my blood boil!

    On the other hand look at non-PC Deadpool, it made an absolute KILLING in the box office, money talks, feminists might be loud but people wanna pay for something that isn’t bulls~~~.

    Wait, Deadpool was non-PC? There was a thread on here about how that one contained feminist garbage aswell.

    that line was just a banter line used in the scene and not feminist crap. Catwoman gets a free pass anyway as she has been around for so long and is an actual fleshed out character and not just a female Thor or Iron Man.

    Someone else put on here ages ago (sorry I forget who) but everyone needs to be careful not to turn into the male equivalent of the feminists who pick holes in everything

    Obviously Star Wars The Feminist Awakens and C~~~busters are political crap but most of the female superheroes in films are absolutely fine. Eg Black Widow in Avengers 2 using the line “I’m always tidying up after you boys”….that isn’t feminist but just banter between the heroes who are friends

    that is the way I see it anyway

    #275192
    Jim01
    Jim01
    Participant
    6678

    bumping this as my post didn’t get recognised

    #275265
    +2
    TaxGuy
    TaxGuy
    Participant

    One topic that hasn’t been mentioned on this thread is how women don’t vote with their dollars, which is why movie companies get this wrong. Women want to be seen as equal to men, so the movie company puts out a You Go Gurl movie. But women don’t go to see it. LeBron James makes more money from Nike than Serena Williams because he sells more shoes. Because guys align their money with their preferences.

    Women want equal pay in sports, but women don’t support women’s sports. Men support men’s sports, and we are supposed to support women’s sports too? Women want the women’s soccer team to make what the men make, and then they run to the mall and spend their money on make-up.

    It creates a big economic disconnect that companies like Sony don’t understand. Not my problem, but companies support feminism at their own demise, because women don’t support feminism financially.

    Order the good wine

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.