Home › Forums › Political Corner › Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating
Tagged: wtf
This topic contains 24 replies, has 22 voices, and was last updated by
Atton 2 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts

Anonymous6
______________________
A Texas politician has filed legislation that would see men fined $100 (£82) for masturbating unless they are doing it in a sanctioned session at a hospital or clinic.Jessica Farrar, a Democrat, created the “Man’s Right To Know Act” to highlight how women have been affected by targeted healthcare legislation in her state, particularly relating to abortion.
She said its rules — including a mandatory waiting period before a vasectomy procedure or receiving a prescription for Viagra, as well as a “medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam” — mirror “real TX laws and health care restrictions faced by TX women every #txlege session”.
The headline stipulation would categorise ejaculation outside either a vagina or medical facility as an “act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life”.
_____________Soooooo this happened…
Thoughts??
Hahaha, sperm is only half a child, so is a female egg. Is she proposing a ban on menstruation too? Try stopping that lol.
The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!
Democrats. Proof that humans evolved from monkeys. They are the missing link.
The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!
WTF? Texas isn’t about to pass such nonsense. That woman needs a psyche exam.
"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

Anonymous25any men certainly wont be masturbating over pics of her
perhaps that’s the root of her penis envy (pun not intended)
She said its rules — including a mandatory waiting period before a vasectomy procedure or receiving a prescription for Viagra, as well as a “medically-unnecessary digital rectal exam” — mirror “real TX laws and health care restrictions faced by TX women every #txlege session”.
The funny part is, if you gave a guy a waiting period for a vasectomy, a guy would just schedule the procedure ahead of time. Viagra is a prescription, so again you would just have to wait a little while for the prescription to start. And no, we don’t have a digital rectal exam, but we do get to “turn our head and cough” while someone cradles our nuts, and have a finger jammed up our ass.
The headline stipulation would categorise ejaculation outside either a vagina or medical facility as an “act against an unborn child, and failing to preserve the sanctity of life”.
Hey, it’s Texas baby. We’ll just form a line at the medical facility, fire up the BBQ, have some beers and watch a ballgame on a big screen. It’s like tailgating, but you get to go do the knuckle shuffle on the p~~~ pump instead of using a urinal when you get to the front of the line.
Unless you want to pull me out of the line and take care of it yourself bitch!
Order the good wine
This guy was spot on:
So… we should also start charging Women for having their period as it is also an act against an unborn child?I’ve read this before, she proposed this nonsense after Texas stopped paying for abortions or something. She claims men took healthcare access away from women, so now women need to take something away from men.
Great comments under the article tho haha
She is in need of some Texas justice

Anonymous6Someone should organize a circle jerk around her office
Just when I thought the world couldn’t get any stupider…
Just wait until tomorrow…Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 for masturbating
Perhaps her father should have jacked-off a little more often. Would this law then make hand or blow jobs a felony???
I remember reading this one last year. I don’t think the paper did its research.
If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.
We would pay off the national debt within a year if we taxed women for each time woman masturbated. Of course if they do not pay the tax they go to jail.
OK I’ll jack off on her face for $100, probably her first time!

Anonymous42Wonder why people (including the police) ignore the law?
I owe $300 now that I read the article.
When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.
This was just a publicity stunt. She was trying compare masturbation to abortion, and therefor made up some crap that written similar to abortion laws. It was very stupid comparison.
But I like her train of thought, she just didn’t carry it far enough. An abortion is preventing a child from born..so therefore, masturbation is preventing a sperm from fertilizing an egg and becoming a child. I’m with you, let’s go on. So if I ask a woman for sex and she says no, then she’s preventing my sperm from fertilizing her eggs and birthing a child. Every woman should be fined $100 for each rejection.
Ok. Then do it.
Sorry, “My body My choice” right? And if it applies to men it needs to apply to woman as well, we all know they enjoy rubbing one out just as much as men do. If it excludes female masturbation it’s nothing but a sexist law creating inequality.
Even though it’s a publicity stunt, it still provides a window into the female mentality.
The possessor of a Birth Canal* is obviously a very special person.
*Not to be confused with the Panama Canal, although in some cases the mistake is understandable.
How is this law about equality lol…its not illegal for women to masturbate. Hell if women masturbated more they wouldn’t be needing so many abortions.
Just a silly publicity stunt to promote a sad strawman argument. It doesn’t even deserve public discussion, other than ridiculing her for bringing it up.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
