Female IT students may see their debts written off

[JasonParticipant 282]

Another idiocy from Feminism World HQ: Sweden. In an article this morning, Digitaliseringskommisionen (lit. “The Digitalization Commission”) presented a list of suggestions aimed at ensuring that the Swedish state and government become fully digital (as in, all documents become available in digital form and all the different institutions have a fully functioning IT department and make proper use of IT; currently, many Swedish politicians and bureucrats literally can’t turn computers on!).

Now, most of the suggestions put forth in the article make sense, so I won’t address them here. I will, however, address one in particular:

“Ett annat förslag är att införa ett system för omfattande låneavskrivning för underrepresenterade kön på vissa IT-utbildningar. Förslaget är att börja skriva av lånen för sex terminers studier för underrepresenterade kön efter examen tills det att minst 30 procent av studenterna tillhör det underrepresenterade könet.

“Incitamentsprogrammet bör införas för de högre IT-utbildningar som har en könsbalans på under 15 procent av underrepresenterat kön”, skriver Digitaliseringskommissionen.”

Which translates to:

“Another proposal is to introduce a system for comprehensive debt cancellation for underrepresented genders in certain IT programmes/courses. The proposal is to begin writing off the debts for six terms’ worth of studies for underrepresented genders after graduation until at least 30 percent of students belong to the underrepresented gender.

The incitament programme should be introduced for those IT programmes/courses that have a gender balance below 15 percent of the underrepresented gender, the Digitalization Commission writes.”

…In other words, they propose that women should have as much as six terms’ worth of their student loans cancelled upon graduation, in order to make more women enter into IT programmes.

Naturally, they couch it in terms of “underrepresented genders” in an effort to make the gender bias less obvious, but we all know that men would never drop below 30 percent in IT programmes unless they become legally banned from joining such programmes in the first place, and that if they ever did drop below 30 percent by some other means, they most certainly wouldn’t receive the same kind of preferential treatment. Heck, I don’t see anyone proposing the same kind of “affirmative action” for programmes in other fields that have less than 30% men in them. Granted, the Digitalization Commission only involves itself with IT, but still, you’d think other institutions would put forth similar proposals if they actually cared about gender equality.

Yeah. “Equality”, eh? Just another word that doesn’t mean s~~~ anymore.

There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Ha! The “real” feminists want all college loans written off — for them; not so much for men’s loans of course.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Klaus WindamierParticipant 543]

…In other words, they propose that women should have as much as six terms’ worth of their student loans cancelled upon graduation, in order to make more women enter into IT programmes.

So, lower the standarts, like in the us, they lowered the standard in military recruitment for woman. Logical outcome : weak military personel.

So, erased debt for woman to encourage them into IT programmes. Man -> working for debt -> stressed -> suicide. Male extermination programme, activated.

Anything that lowering standard is lowering the outcome also.
The product of this woman IT programmes, are 2-3 stars at best (from 1-5 stars).

Lowering standard or erasing debt -> many woman enter -> where the money for all of it come? tax -> who pay taxes? male majority -> country’s money run out because of many people work but not having a good quality -> nation ratings down (developed to developing, developing to third world, and so on)

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

F~~~ing over men to bring up women. It’s getting more and more commonplace.

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

Does that mean that if I join a Gender Studies programme, I get my course fees paid for because I’m a minority??

[Klaus WindamierParticipant 543]

Quietlyquietly wrote:

Does that mean that if I join a Gender Studies programme, I get my course fees paid for because I’m a minority??

Not a chance, you are a male.

[RennieParticipant]

Swedish politicians seem to be completely clueless. None of this fluff will matter if muslims take over the place and overthrow the government. Not to mention the fact that they cannot afford yet another socialist program.

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

</quote>
Not a chance, you are a male.

[/quote]

Educational choice RAAAAPE!!

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I can see a lot of male IT students turning trans or faking gender reassignment …. for a while.

Also we still have the female mind in a male body issue to resolve.

I’d go around in a skirt with a mincey walk for a while ….. who knows …. maybe longer ?

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

In Sweden most feminism is radical feminism, more or less Dworkin-style.
The overwhelmingly majority of Swedish men is under blue pill, many are even “feminists”.
Swedish men were taught their lives matters less than female lives, and they had to care more about females than about themselves. Because the patriarchy and “historical discrimination of wimminz”.
Most Swedish men weren’t even able to hook-up without alcohol involved when I was living in Sweden, BEFORE the new feminist rising (marked by the law criminalising purchasers of sex, 1999).
Sweden has the largest gender gap of the world within prison system: in UK it’s 95 jailed MEN vs 5 jailed females, in USA is about 92 vs 8, in Sweden is 98 vs 2.
Now it must be like Hell-on-Earth for a MAN.

Swedish feminists will NEVER stop complaining and getting their way, REGARDLESS the things they’ll gain.
The CONSERVATIVE government is ready to launch a new law about rape: almost identical to Californian yes-means-yes – but it will be A STATE LAW, not limited to campuses. The left agree, of course.
After that, the pay gender gap, then they’ll try to ban strip clubs (in Iceland it’s already so), and maybe even porn.
In Sweden feminists are so powerful that proposals like forbidding MEN peeing standing up are always shouted by “feminist” males, and not even from feminist parties: Left Party and Green Party.

At such point the ONLY thing that have some chances to save Swedish male gender and heterosexuality is Islam.

A Swedish MAN who doesn’t convert to Islam is not particularly clever: Islamics are privileged as “minority” when instead Swedish MEN are blamed and bashed for everything.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Klaus WindamierParticipant 543]

@eric Lauder

Islam maybe can destroy feminism, yes, but they will be the new trouble, and even worse.

Islamic ideology is, they have to dominate while spare minority of other religion, and for atheist or agnostic for example? they will be killed. The minority have to pay extra tax called jizya, this is made so the minorities (Buddhist, Christian, etc) live would be miserable and they will convert to islam.

So, in my point of view, no, both feminazi and nazislam is cancer, there is no lesser evil, both are evil.

[JasonParticipant 282]

@eric-lauder: Swedish feminists have already called for the abolishment of strip clubs and porn. Granted, only some of the more radical ones, but they have planted the seeds in people’s minds. Unfortunately, they ended up with unexpected (to them) resistance from sexuality and gender rights groups, national and international health organizations and more, including the porn industry itself – not just spokespeople, but individual porn stars and strippers. In short, all the people the radical feminists want to “save” basically said “shut the f~~~ up and leave us alone”. Major PR nightmare, which the Swedish mainstream media of course only mentioned in passing, without following up on the results or the potential long-term implications. Why? Because in Sweden you don’t criticize feminism. Not openly.

Same basic thing with the whole criminalization of sex purchasers; all empirical, psychological and economical studies – both on the national and international level – show that de-criminalization of sex workers and sex purchasers gives the best results in terms of safety, sexual, physical and mental health and individual and state benefits for everyone involved. Which doesn’t jive with the radical feminists’ ideological extremism, and has only found itself mentioned in passing in Swedish mainstream media, while on social media the feminists have done everything in their power to try and denounce the studies that disagree with their position. Reality denial. Instead of changing the outdated map to correspond to the territory, they try to change the territory to correspond to the outdated map. Like trying to destroy the Himalayas because some old map or other shows nothing but plains in the area. Idiocy.

I agree with you fully about Swedish men – we do get taught from an early age that we – both our opinions and our very lives – matter less than those of women, “because of patriarchy” and “historical oppression” and such nonsense. At the same time, the feminists rave about equality. Idiocy, again. For these and other reasons, as you say, the majority of Swedish men can’t hook up without the use of copious amounts of alcohol – otherwise, they wouldn’t dare take such risks, given the social and legal climate. Many don’t dare it even with alcohol in their system. And, of course, some of us eschew both alcohol and hooking up.

I disagree with you on Islam. Not on the part of Islam – currently, anyway – holding the privileged position of a minority in Sweden, with all the perks that entails (this has started to change, though), but on the part of nothing else having the capacity to save the Swedish male gender and heterosexuality. By its very definition, Islam would merely replace one form of gender oppression with another, though admittedly perhaps a slightly less limiting one. But why choose the lesser evil when you don’t have to choose evil in the first place? Rationalism, taken to the sociopolitical level, would do away with both. The only question lies in how to accomplish it.

There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

[hollowtipsParticipant 681]

No matter how you look at it this is sexist and unfair. I’d love to have free education.

[Author]

Posts