Female identifiers

[KahnParticipant 41]

We talk a lot about women, but sometimes its good to take a look at the other side of the equation. We are well familiar with Manginas and White Knights, but there is a third category I feel is especially dangerous:

Female identifiers.

If you do run into one of these guys I suggest being extremely cautious, they imitate female behaviors and hate any sort of masculinity (feeling they are “superior” to other “barbaric” men). They are also extremely passive aggressive, and are almost as good at social manipulation as most women. They may seem nice (creepy nice, you’ll know it when you see it, I found it confusing when I met him, but didn’t know what to do), but that’s just to disarm you.

I’ve run into at least one; but I’ve literally had this guy tell me that he “identifies more with women than with men”

He also told me that he doesn’t consider being a man “anything beyond having a penis.”

Have you run into anything like this?

Do you consider this a sub-type of white knight/mangina or does it deserve its own category?

 

Anyway, stay safe, and stay strong!

[AntaresParticipant 208]

Female behavior is problematic for many reasons, whether it comes from females or males. As I look at how our culture venerates female behavior, and seeks to extinguish manliness, I don’t think it’s unexpected that some boys will begin taking on female behavioral traits. Which is sad because every man acting like a man knows this only makes you miserable. Proof? Look at women themselves.

I’m a simple guy so I don’t think new terms are necessary. By identifying with women, he sacrifices his manliness on the alter of the great fem-hive to gain their approval. It’s a degree father, but not so far removed from sacrificing logic in arguments defending women, or sacrificing pride by allowing women to use him for a punching bag and so forth.

Price is what you pay, value is what you get. -- Ben Graham

[MichaelQBlackParticipant 20]

I’ve long held that any femininity introduced artificially into men is dangerous and leads to weakness of the mind. The metrosexual lifestyle being one example of introducing it through the back door. Most of the world leaders today embody this feminine persona… In the UK, for example, all the major political party leaders came out wearing “this is what a feminist looks like t-shirts” – that’s why the world’s in such a messed up state… Now if we look to Russia, that’s not the case… Putin emphasizes being male… he jails dumb bitches like Pussy Riot, who would offend the sensibilities of any self-respecting man… and all the manginas, white knights and effeminates condemned him. That’s why I say, beware all things womanly! Beware womanly men!

[ReptillianBlocked 1]

Kahn wrote:

I’ve run into at least one; but I’ve literally had this guy tell me that he “identifies more with women than with men”

He also told me that he doesn’t consider being a man “anything beyond having a penis.”

Have you run into anything like this? Do you consider this a sub-type of white knight/mangina or does it deserve its own category? Anyway, stay safe, and stay strong!

This isn’t even a consistent philosophy. If one were to consider a man nothing more than just beyond having a penis, then for what reason he should identify more with women if the criteria of what genitals you hold makes up what you are? Needless to say, I do agree that there isn’t any psychological differences or functional differences between men and women as all the evidences so far holds conflicting opinions on whether they’re actually different.

[Anonymous 42]

Reptillian wrote:

Needless to say, I do agree that there isn’t any psychological differences or functional differences between men and women

WE HAVE A REPTILE TROLL IN SECTOR 7…

/forums/topic/female-identifiers/#post-37521

/womens-shelter/

[Author]

Posts