Even Employers know not to hire American Women

[DurdenParticipant 1051]

http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/2015/05/american-privileged-princesses-no-one.html

The law dictates businesses hire women. Thus businesses are hiring foreign ones. The irony that is justice. I don’t know why their women studies degrees didn’t pan out. Seems like such a good investment.

It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything

[RoyDalParticipant]

Am I going to hire a woman with a work ethic and a degree in the field we need? Or, am I going to hire a a woman who majored in feminist anger studies? Decisions, decisions …

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[WolveParticipant 191]

O god to me this is hilarious, they don’t even understand that the more they demand from employers the more the employers will shy away from accepting them. The basics of capitalism my dear feminists 😉
Ps: I am expecting a feminist “patriarchy!” outcry saying that capitalism is oppressive towards women any day now.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

The die alone s~~~ is another shaming thing. Do not fall for it ans other crap.

They’re also stupid in the extreme. We ALL will die alone …. even them …… unless we take the idiots with use ….. which I would recommend 😃

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Wolve wrote:

Ps: I am expecting a feminist “patriarchy!” outcry saying that capitalism is oppressive towards women any day now.

 

Done and done (unfortuantely):

 

http://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/pesm/marx%20and%20feminism.pdf  <— oldie but goodie

http://www.bupipedream.com/opinion/45033/feminism-is-not-compatible-with-capitalism/

Who can forget classics like:

The restructuring of feminist ideology to ignore economic disenfranchisement is especially unfortunate because patriarchy and capitalism are inextricably linked. Structural sexism is molded comfortably into the foundation of our capitalistic economy.

 

And:

The system of capitalism inevitably operates against underrepresented minorities. This results in a structurally disadvantaged system plagued by white male elites. Government policies that advocate for corporate power and less government spending cut social programs and widen the pay gap. Yet, the existence of big government also harms the welfare of single-parent families, minorities, the disabled and the poor, which are predominately composed of women.

 

Translation:           Give us free stuff because…vagina.

 

(both quotes are from the second link)

 

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[BeerParticipant 11832]

ILiveAgain wrote:

They’re also stupid in the extreme. We ALL will die alone …. even them …… unless we take the idiots with use ….. which I would recommend

When I’m old…I figure with all the money I’m going to save by never having to support a wife…I’ll be able to pay a hot nurse 1/3 my age to take care of me.  That seems like a hell of a lot better than spending my last few years hoping my old decrepit wife can help me out.

Plus its still a 50/50 shot of divorce even if you marry…and if you do marry probably close to a 50/50 shot of outliving your wife for us younger guys who have grown up with safer work environments than past generations.  Get married and ruin your life for a 25% chance you might have some old lady sniveling in the hospital when your about to kick the bucket lol.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Durden wrote:

I don’t know why their women studies degrees didn’t pan out. Seems like such a good investment.

Thank you for this post. I am glad you did. It makes me happy. I’ve noticed that foreign women work harder, complain less, make great coworkers, are educated and intelligent, and lovely to see. Local women… not so much. Ho… lee… cow…

This does make sense that someone comes up with a strategy like this. There’s no way to avoid it. When the feminists find out, there’s nothing they can do to shut down the preference for foreign women. We can always argue they are so oppressed and disadvantaged to local women so boom.

I also am surprised that this strategy exists. I should have figured it out on my own but I didn’t. Excellent. There’s a reason why women’s studies groups fail to see this. Usually the arrogant cannot see things like this because they expect crap to just go their way. This first happened to men, and now it happens to women.

Women’s Studies does not study women. It just brands itself as so. That’s not the study of women, it’s just criminal mindedness. There are two types of criminal mindedness. Criminal mindedness is just another term for entitled. Two ways:

1. Inferiority Complex
2. Superiority Complex

It’s obvious to see how it works. A person who feels inferior believes things come easy to everybody else but him, and a person with an superiority complex believes that he should just be allowed to take what he wants because he’s better. It’s pretty easy to see this in feminism. So, Women’s Studies is a study in Criminal Mindedness.

It’s interesting to note how some criminal cases include psychological evidence. I think that’s just unfair and nasty because it’s circumstantial at best, narrative based, and otherwise downright bullying. You can see this attitude in Patriarchy theory as well. Yet, it makes me wonder how these women can insist in seeing all that they see. Are they only seeing that which is inside of them? Are they projecting? Can Woman’s Studies be used as psychological evidence against them since it demonstrates so well both inferiority and superiority complexes?

Maybe we can classify different feminist thoughts into these two complexes, based on which they demonstrate:

We are superior to men so we should run the world. All men do is exploit others (which is why they make so much), enjoy privilege (which is how they got ahead in life), rape and murder women (because that’s what they do).

–Superiority Comples

Men have it so easy. We have it so hard. We women have carried the world on our backs while men just pillaged and exploited. We have menstrual cycles and carry the children of men in our bellies. We are burdened with being called sluts, discriminated against in all aspects of life, and on and on and on… We need free abortions, we need free healthcare, we need free schooling, extra access to the best jobs, and of course, free tampons and birth control. It’s only fair to balance out the systemic discrimination.

–Inferiority Complex

It’s also interesting to note how freely they’ll jump from one side to the other, freely contradicting itself, hypocritical. As long as they win, they try.

 

[Anonymous 12]

It’s all part of the Marxist grand scheme. Unions as well especially in Australia tend to shut companies down and/or drive them offshore due to unrealistic and stupid demands.

So here is how it all works, encourage the local Women to get excited about Feminism and women’s issues, thus they study this crap that is ultimately useless and also empowers them with an ego and unrealistic expectations and perceptions of their own abilities. But hey, they are women right? There are quotas right?

Yes there are, there are also quotas to be filled for non White women, for women who are still learning English, hey imagine if we could score a Lesbian,  disabled, senior age, refugee from Iraq who is also a Muslim?!

Ka ching, ka ching.

 

 

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Our team don’t hire women. And we make no apology about it. The group of guys I worked with for 3 years don’t have a single female in the office out of 11 media professionals. Mostly because we like to curse when a site breaks when someone forgets a semi-colon. “F~~~ING C~~~~~~~~~ WEBSITE JUST WENT DOWN!! GET ON THAT S~~~!!! “. That’s when a man says “Holy s~~~, Ok I’m on it thanks”.

A woman goes running to HR.

But the number one reason not to hire a woman is because eventually each and every one of them are so preoccupied with being penetrated, EVERYTHING becomes “sexual harassment” and guess who gets to pay for it?? YOU. The business owner. These guys know it too.

One of those TYPICAL “strong and independent” women (client) came in, and the first thing she says is “look at all the testosterone! You guys need a feminine touch around here. There’s no women in here!”. Everyone just rolled their eyes.

They don’t hire women … not because they “don’t hire women”.
But because they DO hire the best person for the job.

Women are the ones who think “you should hire women”…. instead of “you should hire the best people”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[VoidraitheParticipant 477]

If the anti-amnesty crowd wants to win they will show women this and BAM feminists will demand they secure the border so tight a fart couldn’t get through.

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

peterfa wrote:

It’s also interesting to note how freely they’ll jump from one side to the other, freely contradicting itself, hypocritical. As long as they win, they try.

That’s splitting, or “all or nothing” mentality and it’s tied into borderline personality disorder as well as bipolar disorder. It doesn’t surprise me, though, since the majority of these cases tend to be women.

In addition to the reasons KeyMaster mentioned for not hiring a woman, I would also avoid it if I were a man because women are just costly. Turd Flinging Monkey made a vid about it, but to sum it up:

-Women take time off to have children (even if they promise they won’t when they get hired, it only takes one night to go back on that promise)
-Women are more likely to take time off to go to their children’s events like baseball games and recitals
-Women are more likely to use sick days
-Women are more likely to try to secure the “sweet hours” for themselves (weekends and holidays off, not working past 3 in the day, etc)
-Women will try to get employers to pay for their child care (s~~~, we just saw an article where Zoe Saldana was trying to make this case)

It just isn’t prudent.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I could never understand a simple fact: Why would you ever hire a woman for any serious work, when you can hire a man who would actually do the serious work?.. and then I learned about affirmative action and equal opportunity employer bulls~~~

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Russky wrote:

I could never understand a simple fact: Why would you ever hire a woman for any serious work, when you can hire a man who would actually do the serious work?.. and then I learned about affirmative action and equal opportunity employer bulls~~~

Because patriarchy you privileged cis-scum.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Women are really good at nagging, right?
So you’d think they’d be good at nagging jobs, like collections?
Well, think again. Because men were even better at that when I worked in credit )))

Women should get jobs directly linked to bulls~~~ and manipulation to really shine.
What would that be – politics maybe?
Nope, still f~~~ing it up… see all the Baltic states female presidents and Germany and s~~~. Just wait for Hitlary…

Barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen – is my answer

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Author]

Posts