Epiphany or Madness?

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

It’s late/ or early depending on how you look at it. 1:03 a.m. German Local time. So please forgive any errors.

On 20 January 1961 President John F. Kennedy Gave his Inaugural Speech. It addressed concerns of Secret Socities. In it he states, and I quote “Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment.  ”

With this in mind… we’ve all heard the bizarre notion of population control. What if.. by chance, the next attempt includes getting people to abstain from their natural desire to mate. The “Tradition” to Marry and expand one’s genetic pool. Notice I said “Tradition” and not Impulse.

Drown us collectively in the one thing we naturally desire most, and cause us to lose our taste for it. Give females so much power, that they themselves become corrupted.  We all know power corrupts. We also know that women are immature by nature, and what happens when you give said child almost limitless power? It destroys, both within, and without. Quite quickly at that. Faster and more persistent than most known plagues.

No better way to mitigate or nibble at the population numbers then to get men to abstain from women altogether. Of course, we can still count on the white-knights, the ignorant, and the those that blatantly disregard the issues right in front of them to continue to reproduce. But. All I’m saying is that WE, as MGTOW, can’t be the only one’s that see the problem here. It is way too wide spread. And if politicians (men AND women alike) don’t notice it, then something is truly and utterly wrong.

It’s just a thought, maybe it’s wayyy too gawdamn early and I need to take my @$$ back to bed. Chime in on the late night thought if you would.. Thnx.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Anonymous 12]

With this in mind… we’ve all heard the bizarre notion of population control. What if.. by chance, the next attempt includes getting people to abstain from their natural desire to mate. The “Tradition” to Marry and expand one’s genetic pool. Notice I said “Tradition” and not Impulse.

It totally agree with that and believe it has been happening for over 50 years now. To quote the line from Joe Jackson’s song “Real Men” – “And if there’s war between the sexes then there’ll be no people left” look at the populations dwindling in Western Countries only maintained by immigration, look at Japan where they predict a huge population decline as they are staunchly anti immigration.

Get people more interested in hobbies and toys, encourage women to work, make divorce easier for women and more costly for men, create a system where anything a Woman says is gospel and if challenged even by another woman it is considered sacrilege. I could go on and on, you are having an Epiphany as you are seeing what is really happening.

The end result? A smaller population worldwide.Then you will see all these Socialist concepts go out the window and an entirely new system come into effect.

All of this political correctness is about dumbing people down and eliminating critical thought as well. The NWO doesn’t need or want smart people, it wants docile ones.

[DOOGLERParticipant 17]

look up and read the georgia guidestones

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

DOOGLER wrote:

look up and read the georgia guidestones

Im familiar with this and the first time I saw it, it was an eery feeling. There are exactly 10 “guidelines”. Ten is significant because there are ten commandments God gave to Moses. These are mans guidelines. Basically a one world government/court, population control, etc.

I enjoy reading up on these things but they are rabit holes. Youll look at the clock and cant believe youve spent 3 hours reading up on it lol.

MK Ultra is another eye opener. The 13 most powerful blood lines is another. Reading about the original iluminati is a complete trip. Skull and Bones club. Alex Jones vieo of Behemion grove is nuts! Builderberg group. The list goes on.

Everyone considers these consporacies. While I dont know how deep the roots go, and how pervasive they are, the craziest part is: they DO exist and they DO meet in private. Politicians and the worlds wealthiest men meet in COMPLETE privacy (builder burg group).

The founding of the Federal Reserve was done in COMPLETE secrecy. Its not owned by the government but PRIVATE bankers who have a license to print and lend money to the US. Check out Creature from Jekyl Island. A documentary on it.

Resident cynic.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Yes. I am absolutely aware of both MK Ultra,MKDELTA, and it’s various other names, as well as those bizarre GA ‘Guidestones’…. I hate to reference the occult, but really wanted to steer the question towards the ‘WHY?’.

All of this crazy ish going on. We, here see it for what it is. Yes, there are many of us here that are fairly well educated, some of us not as extensively, but collectively, we see through the bs. So my question is why? Why is this utter nonsense taking place? What purpose and whom does it serve? Whom does it benefit, to what degree and to what end?

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

I believe that our current perceptions towards relationships is a direct result of an advanced (heh heh) culture.

Okay, with industrialization, equality, and rapid communication there is bound to be profound social change.

Social change is not necessarily rooted in individual or collective wisdom.  Rather, today it is rooted in individual desires, individual wants, individual needs.

The problems is, that if you have a society that caters to the individual, it is normally at the expense of the collective.  I.e. welfare, alimony, child support, etc.  As this trend progresses, the responsible are alienated and check out.

Oddly enough, any discussion about the individual, is an actual discussion about a collective.  Any collective that demands that their individual needs be met through either direct or indirect redistribution of wealth will become a pariah.  At least to the minority.

We are that minority that views collective battle cry that we are supposed to meet the needs of others as a ridiculous shell game.

Any social trend starts small.  Currently we are part of a trend that eschews any idea that we are any way, or that we should embark on a contract, that makes us responsible for another.  Any social trend starts small.  The blowback from this trend may just be that the population contracts.

By the way.  Any change in demographics is almost always painful.  Either economically, socially, or politically.

If memory serves BinaryLogic.  Your are an educated black man from the United States.  What upheaval proceeded the social and political circumstances that were necessary for the last sentence to be a fact?

Edit.

I don’t thing that there is a cabal at the heart of feminism, and all of the consequences.  There are just too many manginas supporting it.

Rather, it is the result of a collective asking for a handout, and a politico standing by to gain office.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[AFTParticipant 2722]

I agree there is a secret population control agenda, however I don’t agree that

Binary Logic wrote:

No better way to mitigate or nibble at the population numbers then to get men to abstain from women altogether.

There will always be some men that will fulfill their biological urges and help women reproduce. It would be far more effective to stop women from reproducing, if population reduction was the goal. Although it may be a goal, I believe the greater priority is to ENSLAVE, and preserve the natural resources for the select few elite.

Anonymous wrote:

All of this political correctness is about dumbing people down and eliminating critical thought as well. The NWO doesn’t need or want smart people, it wants docile ones.

Exactly, Enslavement first and foremost, then maximizing the residual profits from their efforts, for the enjoyment of the select few elites.

I think we are all on the same page, just perhaps on or two degrees of perspective different. We are all constructing a very similar picture from the reality we see, we can’t be all that far off the mark. Better stock up on tin foil hats 😉

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[v9wlmn8c1982Participant 83]

It is about reducing the world population so the wealthy elite have the resources to themselves and they enslave the remaining human animals.  To do this they basically create laws to make having sex an illegal activity, which is what is happening with the new rape laws. Use things such as porn to turn men of off a real woman for a thing on screen, and all these sex robots and other inventions. Emasculate men, do this by brainwashing and training them to act like a woman and want to be feminine ( Caitlyn Jenner BS) and with the women do the reverse, train them to act like a man so both man and woman will be at war with each other. And last but least, brainwash the women into being a self-entitled narcissist who expectations of a man are so unrealistic. Turn the woman crazy which is what they’ve done.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Soldier-Medic wrote:

By the way.  Any change in demographics is almost always painful.  Either economically, socially, or politically. If memory serves BinaryLogic.  Your are an educated black man from the United States.  What upheaval proceeded the social and political circumstances that were necessary for the last sentence to be a fact?

That’s a really profound question Doc. At the expense of sounding like the exact opposite of educated..

I would say politically, it was the introduction of our current President. I think that with this new-found ‘change’ from the typical ‘White/ Male/ Christian President to something the public was unaccustomed to seeing, also came the means to ‘justify’ a lot more radical actions, judgements, and decisions on his part that include putting new laws into effect whilst simultaneously bypassing both House and Senate process and approval. Laws that seemed to fit some unknown agenda.

Socially we can point the finger at the last 70 years of pro-feminism (redistribution of resources) and economically the last 60 years of immigration (unexpected/undocumented/unaccounted for resource strain). Couple that with a loose cannon  as President with his ‘process be damned’ agenda… and you have a recipe for disaster…

The whole soup pot is complex and almost mind numbing when considering all the varables at play. Point me in the right direction if I’m straying here…

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[QcummerParticipant 652]

Ok, you guys caught me. I am The Man, Head of The Ancient Seers of the Bavarian Illuminati.

ssshhh…just don’t tell anyone. k?

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

I hate to reference the occult, but really wanted to steer the question towards the ‘WHY?’

The occult, in its etymological meaning is simply “hidden”. Its similar to:

Resident cynic.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

The occult, in its etymological meaning is simply “hidden”. Its similar to:

Thanks for the correction. It’s been duly noted brother.

Qcummer wrote:

Ok, you guys caught me. I am The Man, Head of The Ancient Seers of the Bavarian Illuminati. ssshhh…just don’t tell anyone. k?

As if this is news? We’ve been on to you for months.. Lol.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[QcummerParticipant 652]

Binary Logic wrote:

As if this is news? We’ve been on to you for months.. Lol.

 

Cool. Just makin’ sure you f~~~ers are paralyzed by fear, and that you never think for yourself. Trust me, let us do the thinking for you…you’ll be happier.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Damn it. My original reply keeps getting deleted. This is my third attempt to edit it. F~~~.

Occult is synonymous, etymologicaly, with clandestine and esoteric.

To me the WHY question is as old as mankind: control, power, and wealth. Man has always tried to usurp as much of these as possible. But we cant talk ABOUT a group until they are identified.

I think WHO and How are more interesting questions. Im a capitalist, but something wrong is happening when

the 80 richest people having the same wealth as the poorest 50%

I dont know how organized, elicit, or pervasive such a group is “cabal”…But we do KNOW the worlds wealthiest men meet annually in complete privacy with politicians. Thats illegal. No press. Noone allowed. You cant tell me there isnt a conflict of interest with “We the People”.

Something is most certainly going on that they dont want to be done in the open light of day.

As for the feminists: they are just clueless puppets believing they are “freeing themselves” and fighting for some perverted notion of liberty. They have no idea what true damage is done to society by this. They are too short sighted, filled with their lust of this power.

 

Resident cynic.

[QcummerParticipant 652]

like Carlin said, “there’s a club, and we ain’t in it”. He’s talking about you, not me. I’m in it.

[EdogParticipant 254]

Aaron Russo tells us what he knew. And as usual, men are at the helm of all women’s movements.

He speaks real knowledge and wisdom, proven true by time.

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

Binary Logic wrote:

The whole soup pot is complex and almost mind numbing when considering all the varables at play. Point me in the right direction if I’m straying here…

Yes a soup.  Perhaps a stew ladened with just about everything.

The point I was trying to make was first:

Profound change brings about pain.  Pain to the resistors, pain to the promoters, and pain to the bystander.  The change that came that made your circumstance a reality, was painful.

The 70 something years of change that has come that gave birth to modern feminism has been fraught with pain.

So we are looking at two ideologies.

1.  Should a man be afforded every opportunity regardless of race?

2.  Should a woman be afforded every advantage/luxury/compensation/consideration because she is a woman, at the expense of everyone around her?

Both are painful changes in the social landscape.

Both are the byproduct of people willing to fight for what they want or believe is justice.

Binary Logic wrote:

Socially we can point the finger at the last 70 years of pro-feminism (redistribution of resources)

I think you have your own answer.  MLK wanted equality.  He sought that we should be judged from the content of our character rather than the color of our skin.

Women want to be overlords because of their reproductive anatomy.

This has been achieved through politics and not some conspiracy.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Soldier-Medic wrote:

MLK wanted equality.  He sought that we should be judged from the content of our character rather than the color of our skin.

Women want to be overlords because of their reproductive anatomy.

This has been achieved through politics and not some conspiracy.

Yes and yes, both are true.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RoyDalParticipant]

Edog wrote:

Aaron Russo tells us what he knew. And as usual, men are at the helm of all women’s movements.

This video is an eye opener.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Author]

Posts