Entrepreneurs in Cars is a total moron

[InTheCountryParticipant 199]

The youtube channel “entrepreneurs in cars” is run by a total idiot. This fake neo-masculinist preaching to the men of the world to lift weights and rush back to the plantation to offer the wahmins the best version of yourself. This is the type of guy where you walk by him and smell the strong scent of Irish Springs freshly showered c-0-ck mixed with cologne. What is hilarious, is that he tries to come across like some mantor (man mentor) while basically telling guys to suit up and hand it over. He tells men to ignore their observations and simply accept that a presence of a modern trash woman in your life is the apex of masculine achievement. Why does he say mgtow gets it wrong? Very simple. MGTOW is a threat to 21 studios’ business model. 21 studios needs broken men on the verge of a blue pill reset to fly out to their silly conferences where they bring Ukrainian women to stand on stage and have jackasses practice “taking their hand” with ultra penis confidence gestures.

What absolute horse a$$ bull$hit.

The channel is basically a blue pill enforcement ideology for men who are heart broken and really want to be chad thunderc-0-ck. They need to keep men in the loop to sell tickets to their conferences where you get to smell old spice rising off of freshly showered penises at the euro-gym.

[InTheCountryParticipant 199]

The logo for the channel should be a giant penis smiling and polishing a bald head next to corvette.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22503]

InTheCountry wrote:

The youtube channel “entrepreneurs in cars” is run by a total idiot. This fake neo-masculinist preaching to the men of the world to lift weights and rush back to the plantation to offer the wahmins the best version of yourself. This is the type of guy where you walk by him and smell the strong scent of Irish Springs freshly showered c-0-ck mixed with cologne. What is hilarious, is that he tries to come across like some mantor (man mentor) while basically telling guys to suit up and hand it over. He tells men to ignore their observations and simply accept that a presence of a modern trash woman in your life is the apex of masculine achievement. Why does he say mgtow gets it wrong? Very simple. MGTOW is a threat to 21 studios’ business model. 21 studios needs broken men on the verge of a blue pill reset to fly out to their silly conferences where they bring Ukrainian women to stand on stage and have jackasses practice “taking their hand” with ultra penis confidence gestures.
What absolute horse a$$ bull$hit.
The channel is basically a blue pill enforcement ideology for men who are heart broken and really want to be chad thunderc-0-ck. They need to keep men in the loop to sell tickets to their conferences where you get to smell old spice rising off of freshly showered penises at the euro-gym.

Tradcuck pussy worshippers trying to do their best woman impersonation of blame shifting and guilt shaming.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Yup, Entrepreneur in Cars is pua retarded crap. I think TFL and FAs have it wrong when they claim that MGTOW are ‘incels in denial.’ Not true, its the PUAs who are “incels in denial.” So called “game” doesnt work. Alcoholics Anonymous has a better success rate than PUA Gaming (AA has a 7% success rate, but to be fair, this is mainly because its not meant to be treatment for alcoholism, its a mild religion tailored to drunks).

His channel reminds me of an Info-mercial type guy that was on Youtube a couple years ago that was basically giving motivation-lectures featuring Red Pills in them and wanted to charge a flat fee like $19.99 to view “the rest of his content.” He basically awes you with a few evo-psych truths about women (that he stole from Stardusk) and then asks you to pay to hear the rest…

As I said before, the default opinion by MOST men is NAWALT. Tradcons, PUAs, TFL, FA, “incel” (even though they dont exist) and especially all male feminists, white knights, cucks and simps, 18 year olds and 60 years olds…they ALL cling to this classic deflection: Not All Women Are Like That And when you point out, that NAWALT by reduction, means that MOST women ARE LIKE THAT, they resign to self-flagellation, blaming themselves for not “finding the right one” or “treating her better.” Kind of like you said before Country, how long does society expect us to keep searching for a NAWALT? To infinity, you must keep dating and searching to infinity. You must drink the Koolaid, put the Nikes on, and laydown and wait for the Unicorn to show up.

[InTheCountryParticipant 199]

PUAs are guys that don’t want to believe the hard truth because you have to accept that pursuing sex will put you into the mouth of the lion.
It is always a risk, and pua is the study of how to go gambling with a confident demeanor.

A so called “incel” (Guy that might be socially awkward and be high IQ appearing socially strange, or an undesirable) could win the lottery and suddenly find himself seduced by a woman blowing him daily until the day after marriage.

I find the PUA guys to be identical to salesmen with a clearly false front. What is important to them? To not be seen as weak in relation to other men, and here is the key, in front of others. These guys preach obedience to hierarchical ascension rules. They don’t want to be seen as weak in relation to other men by other men and especially women. They have invested their identity into the social sphere’s approval mechanism. They want to BE in relation to the group’s esteem. The problem with this, is the same as fame. You need to be interacting with the group and posturing in order to feel real and successful.

How do you feel successful, or rather, WHOLE, outside of a group? Well, that takes much suffering and can be an ongoing battle for some.

[InTheCountryParticipant 199]

The question of identity is a tough one to grasp in terms where the value lies.

For example, is the actual essence of the man who is a TFL or Incel different with or without money? If he suddenly found himself rich, he COULD solve the problem. He wouldn’t be loved for who he is, but he would have the bells and whistles to temporarily claim the woman prize and posture with status in relation to others.

Some men are high IQ with excellent verbal and communication skills, but the self-awareness due to their healthy acute mind forces them to confront the awkwardness of knowing IN THE MOMENT that a false persona needs to be crafted in order to relate to women. Game is learning to craft a false persona and present it to the woman. So, that particular awkward man might be in fact brilliant in a variety of ways, physique, excellent artist, many skills, but he cannot bear to posture with false persona because it feels gross and alien to him. So, that man could be pegged as incel or tfl, through no actual fault other than a corrupt social hierarchy demands he betray himself to participate in its illusions.

Incel is too broad a category to take seriously. The reasons for wanting to be able to have a mate but not having one are many and can cross into various circumstances ie: disability, too high IQ, too aware, fat, etc.

I believe the real essence of these issues is in the emotional need that presents itself from within and makes one feel weak or dependent on another to satisfy it. To need another, puts them in the seat of power. If they don’t need you, or you are expendable, how can you properly negotiate with any leverage?

[InTheCountryParticipant 199]

The existential crisis is to confront the unsatisfied need wired directly into your being. The ultimate catch 22 is that in order to satisfy this need you have to sacrifice your well being. Since you are aware and know this will happen, you have to consciously wrestle with the flesh as it tries to control your behavior.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

InTheCountry wrote:

Incel is too broad a category to take seriously.

I agree, you could argue that up to 80-90% of men are so-called “incel.” I personally, only give credence, to the most strict form of the word which would apply to say .01% of men (100th of a percent) where “Incel” is basically the Male version of NAWALT. They hold the same value as far as persons per 1000. Are there real incels who honest to god cant achieve sex, yes but they are rare, just like women that actually love you and are faithful despite better options.

InTheCountry wrote:

the real essence of these issues is in the emotional need that presents itself from within and makes one feel weak

Precisely. The men who abase themselves with the label ‘Incel’ are not incels in the true sense of the word, they are neurotically depressed or some sh!t. They prefer self-flagellation. They celebrate morose!

Just as Men have no Own Group Preference <- this fact is on full display with men who adopt a disparaging, incorrigible, self shaming, label that says nothing at all about Men, but everything about women’s artificial SMV. These men, in a grandstand to display Female Group Preference, gladly take the shame and apply it to themselves to save face for women. They are martyring themselves to preserve the false sanctity of women.

The concept, Involuntarily Celibate implies that there are Voluntary Non-Celibate MEN. Who exactly are they? Women control when sex occurs, they hold the keys to intercourse.

So in actuality, the only men who aren’t “Incels” are Rapists. Can anyone argue against this logic?

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Gravel Pit wrote:

The concept, Involuntarily Celibate implies that there are Voluntary Non-Celibate MEN. Who exactly are they? Women control when sex occurs, they hold the keys to intercourse.

So in actuality, the only men who aren’t “Incels” are Rapists. Can anyone argue against this logic?

This is why I say that the term is BUNK. When logic is applied, its flimsy back breaks and nothing is left but a finger pointing at Women’s overt sense of sexual worth. (Women’s overbought SMV). Women believe they’re entitled to men that are leagues out of their league. They want to believe the lie so badly, they will settle for brief episodes of that delusion, with Chads and Alphas, slowly burning their vagina’s wick down to the nub on Dating Apps. And at the end, when she is 34 years old with 78+ notches on her bedpost, and she is finally ready to settle for a nice 34 year old guy. He snubs his nose at her (if he has a shred of self respect) … Is this not the story of 40 million young adults from Santa Monica to Raleigh?

[Branched offParticipant 10920]

Men who like flash cars and body building and practise PUA skills are very weak men who are seeking validation from trying to attract women. To my mind they are worse than the regular blue pill guys by a long way. They claim to be red pill but they actually add to the problem that women cause in their life and in society. They make manhood into a performing pony to go round on the c~~~ carousel. They cheapen womanhood into an airhead sitting with her friends deciding whether or not to swipe right. Could you honestly ever want to put your dick in a woman who was so shallow as to judge a man on such things? I find women who like PUAs and gym monkeys and such actually ugly somehow. Such men and such women are like the fragrances you buy in Walmart. Fake oud, fake musk, geranium in place of rose (if you are lucky) and a huge dose of synthetic parfum. Gets right up my nose.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[D.B.D.Participant 889]

I can’t stand those guys either. One of these days they or their worshipers are going to mouth off or threaten the wrong MGTOW in person and things are going to get real ugly real quick.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Why do you guys hate this guy so much? He isn’t MGTOW and he doesn’t try to portray himself as being MGTOW. He’s not trying to pass himself off as being something that he isn’t…

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Autolite wrote:

Why do you guys hate this guy so much?

It’s disdain more than hate.

This might be the youtuber I made the mistake of watching once who was “pro-MGTOW” for clicks (and ad revenue) but said something like: “MGTOW is only for old divorced men, not for young, single men.”

Why? So those young, single men can get divorce raped and become old, divorced men?

Going Your Own Way is for ALL Men. Because it’s what defines a Man. Real MGTOW understand this implicitly.

It’s a fact that there are far more MGTOW out there than have ever heard of MGTOW. Unfortunately it’s also a corollary that there are a lot of men out there claiming to be MGTOW who aren’t MGTOW and don’t understand the first thing about MGTOW.

[LastManStandingParticipant 638]

Guy is indeed a total assclown.

[Vajra VarahaParticipant 1283]

It’s interesting to see these incel topics show up. I see them more frequently from people who come out of no where and attempt to define the term. Somebodies got an agenda again controlling the language. You guys need to be more aware of the scam.

And women do not control when sex occurs.
I can think of numerous times I’ve turned down a women. Flat out. With the shocked look on their faces.

May be time for me to pack up and leave. I’m seeing too many anomalies on this website now.

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Grass is green, water is wet, EIC is a blue pilled cuck. SSDD.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

It’s interesting to see these incel topics show up.

Google is manipulating it. They rise in visibility of these channels is a last b!tch effort to shame men into going back to women. You’ll notice that MGTOW and general red-pill content on the platform is basically undiscoverable. You can’t go through the recommended rabbit hole anymore and even outright searching if you don’t know the specific channel or video title is unusable.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

Going Your Own Way is for ALL Men. Because it’s what defines a Man. Real MGTOW understand this implicitly.

More specifically, because it’s the man defining himself. As the saying goes, MGTOW is freedom.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

And women do not control when sex occurs.
I can think of numerous times I’ve turned down a women.

So what does that prove? Absolutely nothing other than you turned down sex. You have no power to initiate it.
When you want sex, who holds the keys? Women.

Its called consent. I maintain that, by their insane logic (the way they are using the word incel) then by their definition, ALL men are incels except for legitimate rapists! The term implies that there exists Voluntary Non-Celibates, the opposite of so-called Involuntary Celibates. Who are these “Voluntary Non-Celibates” other than rapists? See how fvcking retarded the word is? It makes no sense. All it does is confirm how pretentious and grandiose women are about sex.

In reality, the only REAL incels are a TINY, TINY insignificant percentage of men, like a few in every million, who are too ugly looking, retarded, disabled and smelly. We’re talking a statistical anomaly on par with the mythical NAWALT. They exist but there are so few of them, we shouldnt worry about it. Most people can get sex with little effort, its a matter of standards and simply asking them.

The whole point is this. Sex is BROKEN. Shaming MEN for the broken mating game is like kicking a dog for peeing on the floor when YOU havent taken the dog out in days. This is not men’s problem. Sex is the domain of women. They have reneged on the deal because they do not take men out! We’re left to our own devices while they ride Chads on Dating Apps.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

And women do not control when sex occurs.
I can think of numerous times I’ve turned down a women.

If she asks you for sex, and you turn her down. That means nothing because she can find a willing dick within 10 mins. For women, its as easy as going to nearest cafe or grocery store, going up to a random guy and offering sex to him. He WILL say yes, we all know its true. WOMEN CONTROL WHEN SEX HAPPENS, unless you’re a rapist… (and ofcourse that makes sense too right? Because men are all rapists, and the ones who arent, are incels….)

[Author]

Posts