ELIMINATION FIRST

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Hello Everyone…. I got a great tip from a guy who works in online dating sales and marketing. Every guy nows online t~~~s are complete s~~~ at responding. But what if you could eliminate HER first? He swears from experience that sending this type of email out is the best way to go:

——————————————————

Hi. There are 3 kinds of women here:

1. Whores looking for a wallet.
2. Attention whores, fake accounts and posers
3. …and women who are fun and like to have a good time.

Which one are you?

——————————————————-

That’s it. (not exact wording I didn’t write it down as he told me)

Now you force her to classify herself. When you don’t hear back from her, it’s like she’s telling you she’s a whore. It’s not even a silly PUA angle. You don’t have to type out all kinds of other s~~~. It doesn’t matter what she typed on her profile, every one of them gets the same message. PASTE. SEND. PASTE. SEND. PASTE. SEND 100 times…. and go about your day. If other guys send the same message, even better!. It tell them women seeking validation, or dinners, or concert tickets, and s~~~ paid-for can go f~~~ themselves.

• All of her “likes” and “I wants” are meaningless.
(You don’t care, and mention none of them.)
• It literally “starves” the system.
• You don’t give her validation, she has to come and get it
• You force her to qualify herself
• Saves a boatload of time.
• You establish ground rules, and she better be fun or she is out

Now you never have to message her again, you can go about ignoring her from this point on. and she has done all of the work for you. She knows by not responding that’s the end of the interaction, and she no longer exists. A lot of MGTOW don’t care enough to bother, but if you’re online scoping, drop this little bomb and let me know what happens.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Total LeeParticipant 1573]

Interesting approach but I have sworn off online dating thing forever. F~~~ it they aint worth it.

[MurveParticipant 21]

This is actually a very good way of presenting a challenge to women. I really think that women need re-educating on their values and the fact that men are starting to wake up and smell the coffee when it comes to the attitudes of women shows that men are really looking for women for more than just vagina when it comes to a relationship.

I’m starting to notice a different perspective when I view women’s profiles. I can see more between the lines now and when I browse through the choice of women, I’ve noticed the possible viable choices for myself becoming even more meager than I originally thought when I signed up. Taking the “red pill” is giving men values and principles and this is causing, at least for myself, my choice of women to be much more refined.

I just look through profiles of women now and think, “what can you offer me other than your priceless vagina that my male friends don’t already provide?”. Women friends are next to useless for a man unless they provide “benefits” in most cases. But male friends for women provide them with a safety net of security to protect them from unwanted male attention, an emotional hub of strength for her or to provide them with family or financial support. Which guy with his eyes wide open wants to be THAT sucker with only empty promises of sex or even a sniff at her vagina?

I’m reminded of a recent night out when I approached a young woman. We were getting along great until her female friend came up and said, “You know this guy is her boyfriend, right?”. I looked to my left and saw this poor dude stood there looking a bit like the spotlight had just landed on him. It took him a couple of seconds to compose himself as he quickly realised what was going on. He puffs his chest out and tries to look a little bit protective. I knew he wasn’t her boyfriend, poor fella, but I just laughed and said, “Well, nevermind then, have a good night you guys!” and walked off. How the hell was I supposed to counter that c~~~ block? 5 minutes later the guy had also been rejected and he’d left the club, obviously thinking he’d been in with a chance, I just thought the whole thing was bulls~~~..

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

If you pay for a dating site you are a big loser, because you will need to put a lot of effort to go on a date. Too many people behind the screens. You have to realize the attractive women put little to no effort in their profile. A few hots pics and a few lines. You have to be extremely desperate to go a dating to get dates.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[braininavatParticipant 95]

Forgive me for injecting a discordant note here, but I have in the past pursued that most elusive of NAWALTs, the intelligent, intellectual chick. I met one. For a woman, she was remarkably intelligent and knowledgeable. However, after meeting once I didn’t hear from her again. (Well, when I used to go on dates, that happened a lot. Actually, almost all of the time.)

If you’re looking for that immediate charge of physical attraction and chemistry, then an early meeting is a must in order to avoid wasting your time. But if you’re looking for a chick with particular emotional or intellectual qualities, it actually helps to correspond. The correspondence is a crucial vetting step, just like meeting in person is a crucial vetting step for physical chemistry. If you send a thoughtful and intelligent message to a chick, and she is incapable of responding in kind (or unwilling to do so), then you know to close off that prospect and move on to the next one.

The intellectual vetting process is another way of putting a sharp challenge to a woman out front, but if you are pursuing chicks like this, the above example given by KeyMaster is not going to work. However, it could be reformulated:

Hi. There are 3 kinds of chicks here:

1. Chicks looking for freebies;
2. Chicks looking for attention, fake accounts and posers;
3. …and chicks who have something of their own to offer and are capable of carrying on an intelligent conversation.

Which one are you?

[MurveParticipant 21]

To be honest I’m thinking of starting again on another site. I think I’ve exhausted my list of decent women I’ve found on Benaughty.com. I’m still talking to one girl on there who seems open-minded and unspoiled but the single mothers I was talking to and the fat girls that showed more willing, I’ve not responded to and the conversation has fizzled out. I will be trying a more direct approach on a new dating site to see if any woman is willing to be challenged and have her views put under the spotlight.

I tried a similar approach with a 20 year old yesterday. She had no profile picture or description so I told her to get them filled in and come back and talk to me. She said she was only on the site to chat, so i asked her if she’d ever met anyone from the site and if she’d be willing to meet anyone. She told me to “shut my trap”, so I took that as a “yes” and wished her good luck in her search. I don’t put smiles and kisses on the end of my chat messages anymore, just a full-stop. It sends the right message.

3 days later she messaged me again and we got talking and she told me she’d like to meet in a public place.. Seems to work.. She lacks intelligence I think though, her typing is awful and I have to give her a chance to keep the conversation alive. I’ll be damned if I’m going to be the one doing all the work in conversing with women anymore. It’s almost like a silent challenge which says, “Well? I’ve done my part.. what have YOU got?”

[TheBardParticipant 974]

<cite>@crazycanuck said:</cite>
If you pay for a dating site you are a big loser, because you will need to put a lot of effort to go on a date. Too many people behind the screens. You have to realize the attractive women put little to no effort in their profile. A few hots pics and a few lines. You have to be extremely desperate to go a dating to get dates.

I don’t really trust dating sites in general because they need you single to make money. Once you find someone you no longer need their site so that is one reason I will not pay, plus my luck with women is too bad to justify paying so I just use ok cupid. I only re activated mine to in a few months from now when I have no girlfriend and have gotten no dates and can help prove to everyone I have bad luck with women so they will shut up lol. I don’t even message women. I just look at profiles and when I see something I like I add the profile to my favorites and wait. They know I looked at their profile lol. I am not going to give them the satisfaction of being one of the many guys messaging them so they can take their sweet time playing around with.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Some simple rules. When meeting first time, that’s for OLD or real life is just meeting for drinks. Make it low key, don’t spend a wad of cash on her. Ideally coffee is good if she thinks coffee is not enough for her then forget it.

Don’t bother with paid dating sites, pretty much I have heard that people on paid sites are also on POF. POF is trash though, look at women’s profiles, it’s either average or below with crazy lists or hot women with little in their profile.

I want every guy to be a winner on here. The time you spend online looking for a woman could have been better spent in real life. A lot of people on OLD don’t even want to meet you, don’t waste your time with these people. You don’t need to spend money to meet women. Ride a bicycle, go for walks, shopping malls, library, etc.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

I’m reminded of a recent night out when I approached a young woman. We were getting along great until her female friend came up and said, “You know this guy is her boyfriend, right?”. I looked to my left and saw this poor dude stood there looking a bit like the spotlight had just landed on him. It took him a couple of seconds to compose himself as he quickly realised what was going on. He puffs his chest out and tries to look a little bit protective. I knew he wasn’t her boyfriend, poor fella, but I just laughed and said, “Well, nevermind then, have a good night you guys!” and walked off. How the hell was I supposed to counter that c~~~ block? 5 minutes later the guy had also been rejected and he’d left the club, obviously thinking he’d been in with a chance, I just thought the whole thing was bulls~~~..

Sounds like you were at a bar. Bars are pretty bad choice to pick women, quality ones anyways. Bars are only good for hookups or dancing, I never even come close to having friendships let alone relationship with women at bars.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[IggyThundersParticipant 246]

<cite>@murve said:</cite>
To be honest I’m thinking of starting again on another site. I think I’ve exhausted my list of decent women I’ve found on Benaughty.com. I’m still talking to one girl on there who seems open-minded and unspoiled but the single mothers I was talking to and the fat girls that showed more willing, I’ve not responded to and the conversation has fizzled out. I will be trying a more direct approach on a new dating site to see if any woman is willing to be challenged and have her views put under the spotlight.

I tried a similar approach with a 20 year old yesterday. She had no profile picture or description so I told her to get them filled in and come back and talk to me. She said she was only on the site to chat, so i asked her if she’d ever met anyone from the site and if she’d be willing to meet anyone. She told me to “shut my trap”, so I took that as a “yes” and wished her good luck in her search. I don’t put smiles and kisses on the end of my chat messages anymore, just a full-stop. It sends the right message.

3 days later she messaged me again and we got talking and she told me she’d like to meet in a public place.. Seems to work.. She lacks intelligence I think though, her typing is awful and I have to give her a chance to keep the conversation alive. I’ll be damned if I’m going to be the one doing all the work in conversing with women anymore. It’s almost like a silent challenge which says, “Well? I’ve done my part.. what have YOU got?”

I always get a kick out of all the chicks on these sites who claim to be “highly intelligent” and love to have “deep intellectual and philosophical conversations”. With the exception of a very select few they are almost all blithering idiots. They seem to think that if they read a Dostoyevsky novel in college or flipped through a book on psychology they are somehow now “intellectuals”. Its really a laugh riot. Especially when you meet them in the flesh. Bring up a few different or topics and they look at you like the proverbial deer in the headlights. Another thing they all claim to have is almost superhuman levels of confidence and self-esteem. Again, its all bulls~~~. One wrong word or if things dont go as they expected and they are reduced to a puddle of tears as soon as they reach home. Its all smoke and mirrors with these broads.

[RobertParticipant 18]

I’m done with all of it. No woman will ever live with me again. It’s all bulls~~~. I get nothing but sex out of relationships and I can buy that(fleshlight) or stick and move. I’m not going to be a PUA either cause that’s a just pathetic. Good technique for an opening email though. 😀

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

I’m done with all of it. No woman will ever live with me again. It’s all bulls~~~. I get nothing but sex out of relationships and I can buy that(fleshlight) or stick and move. I’m not going to be a PUA either cause that’s a just pathetic. Good technique for an opening email though. 😀

Hey Robert, I agree with you. Just be happy that you didn’t get married. Sex with headaches obviously lol

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

You might want to add #3. Are you taking medication? I read an article stating on cupid about 1/4 women are on medication for mental illness.

One in four women take medication for a diagnosed mental illness

http://www.returnofkings.com/41109/did-okcupids-experiments-increase-the-likelihood-of-rape?ModPagespeed=noscript

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[KeymasterKeymaster]

@Iggy…. a hundred times YES to everything re: thinking they are intellectuals who want “deep and meaningful conversation”.

Honey, if I want that, I will go talk to another man.
We don’t date you for the “deep and meaningful conversation”.

The fake self-esteem is perfectly called out too. The same chick will start bawling as soon as she gets home and all you need to do is not try and bang her that night. They suffer from a form of “reverse grandiosity”. They believe “men are intimidated” by them… until they figure out he is not intimidated at all, he’s just NOT INTERESTED.

“Reverse grandiosity” is when she will appear to have her self-esteem in check and show some forced humility. She may even be self-deprecating. i.e “I’ve put on some weight and am feeling totally fat these days”. Then when you simply agree with her: “Well, I wasn’t going to say anything…….” and play along, all hell breaks loose, and exactly the same girl reveals it was just for show.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

KeyMaster, use Mjolnir, the mighty ban hammer!

Women are on these sites looking for her unicorn and/or ego boost. Nothing more. Nothing less. Like I said in another thread, 5 years on multiple dating sites and you can’t find anyone in 12 parsec radius of you?

Leave women to their own devices. Acquire currency. Spend it on yourself.

Fuck this planet.

[TyberiusParticipant 25]

I am not surprised at CrazyCanuck’s link. I think all bitches are whacked out.

[torch1980Participant 93]

Yup women are basically just sitting in their section 8 project “apartments”, dealing with kids, being overweight, working or not working, and just waiting for that brad pitt looking, 50 cent acting, bill gates money and channing tatum body to come type to them, sweep her away from her “welfare” lifestyle she created on her own….

"I think of a man, and I take away reason & accountability"

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Having had accounts at various times on sites from Tinder to OkCupid to MissTravel, I’d have to say I believe they are all built around a similar algorithm designed to work in phases as follows:

1) rope you in with a month or two of legitimate, promising contacts
2) encourage you to get deeper into the site by soliciting more content from you while promising better results
3) slowly clamp down on the quality and frequency of your contacts
4) offer premium services to gain access to a better pool of women
5) shunt you to the fat loser catfish pond if you don’t buy

Sound familiar? It’s pretty much the same as the way a woman ropes a dope into a relationship. Snag him with some quick sex, set the hook by getting him to invest himself in the deal, start withdrawing from him, imply that things will get better if he opts in for a big commitment, go frigid when he refuses to deliver the cash and prizes.

This is why I stopped using dating sites… they stopped working when I refused to give them what they wanted from me.

[McLocoParticipant 14]

I have read some of thease posts and am tempted to go for 1 last month on a dating site to see if it accually works, I am not entirely convinced but it wouldnt take much time, basically copy paste it with a slight spin and send it to everyone to see what the general response is. Does anyone think this is a good idea, or should I just delete all the accounts right away?

I wouldnt get anything out of it but it would be an interesting experiment. One thing I have discovered though is if a woman gets offended somehow do not engage with her, as you are giving her exactly what she wants, and with time to think about her response as someone else in here stated, she feels her “intelect” is superior. Greatest myth ever: Women want intelligent conversations, no they want to feel superior to others.

[ManocalypseParticipant 321]

As for women’s intelligence, try the labrynthine test on them. Drop the word into conversation with them, if they don’t know what it means then they are not worth having any interesting conversations with…

[Author]

Posts