This topic contains 7 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Anonymous 3 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
[This is the first of a two-parter on the Italian Banking System. Ii looks at the causes for the current Referendum under Mario Renzi’s government]
While most of Italy celebrates post-referendum, only a small fraction of the population are aware of the massive economic debt in the order of €360bn in Italy’s fragmented banking sector.that PM Renzi has failed to contain, let alone provide solutions for.
That sum is the amount of non-performing loans (NPLs) being nursed by Italian banks.Italy has more than 500 banks with more branches than restaurants.
Banks across Europe have been shunned by investors, with an index of shares for major European banks down 22% from 2008. Comparatively Italy’s bank stock index is down 35%, with its biggest bank, Unicredit, having dropped a whopping 40%.
Revenues are under intense pressure from interest rate policies of the ECB, which in April 2016 cut rates to zero.
The troubled loans amount to 18% of all lending, three times the EU average. Unlike the crisis which hit banks hard in Spain and Ireland, this situation has not arisen from a frenzy of lending to fuel a property boom before the 2008 bust, but through years of failing to tackle poor lending practices worsened by weak economic growth.
Italy waited too long to copy Spain, which in 2012 created a “bad bank”, largely to house those troubled property loans and could be bailed out by the ECB. The new, more stringent EU state-aid rules (that were tested in Cyprus in 2013) required NPL purchases by a public entity to automatically trigger an onerous ‘bail-in’ of bank creditors.
Savers were to take 8% of any liabilities prior to an ECB bailout. This move would decimate Italy’s middle class and crush the welfare state that underscored Renzi’s power base.
Just before Christmas of 2012, and before the EU rule change, Italy took steps to avoid depositors having to take losses in four main lenders: Banca Etruria, Banca Marche, CariFerrara and CariChieti. Some bondholders were forced to take losses, sparking a furious reaction when a retired man who lost €110,000 in Banca Etrutia bonds killed himself.
Renzi has since adopted a three-pronged approach under the new ECB rules to limit bail-ins: (1) ‘Atlante’ – a €4.25bn fund as a liquidity backstop which is also intended to buy bad debts; (2) a plan to allow banks to package up NPLs into bonds with a government guarantee to try to attract buyers (a sort of bad bank); and (3) a move to speed up the time it takes to repossess properties, which can currently take up to 15 years in order to recoup mortgaged assets.
Renzi’s first test came in May 2016, when his fund was forced into control of Popolare di Vicenza, Italy’s eighth largest lender. Vicenza’s €1.5bn fundraising was shunned by investors and Atlante’s involvement meant other leveraged banks were not forced to pick up the bill.
The next test was a €1bn cash call by Veneto Banca also in May 2016. This was underwritten by a group of banks led by Intesa Sanpaolo. Following a failed stock market listing in June 2016 it was taken over by the bail-out fund, Atlante.
About this time Renzi realised his options were insufficent to deal with crises involving more banks under the EU rules.
Without an Italian Central Bank there was no room to control interest rates or devalue the currency.To keep the banks running he needed changes to the banking sector and employment regulations that were currently protected under the Constitution.
Renzi called for a Referendum that most people saw as as an extension of the EU to take control of their country’s assets just like Greece.
On 29 July 2016 a European Union bank stress test found Monte Paschi di Siena requiring refinancing. The recapitalization efforts began late Nov 2016 and throughout Dec 2016. But investors and plans on foreign capital coming to the bank’s rescue could freeze after a “no” vote
The results on 5th Dec 2016 saw the end of his attempts to force a resolution on behalf of the banking system.
Stripped of governmental support, the path ahead for the Italian Banking System now appears to be uncertain.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/10/battle-prop-up-italy-banks-eu-brexit-grexit-bad-loans
https://dailyreckoning.com/5-questions-answered-italy-referendum/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banca_Monte_dei_Paschi_di_SienaI have lost count of how many countries — entire civilizations even — have been destroyed by debt.
Running up debt — either on a national level, or a personal level — is a proven recipe for disaster.
BTW, Italy has done this several times over in living memory.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
I have lost count of how many countries — entire civilizations even — have been destroyed by debt.
Less than the number of civilizations destroyed by women. Debt may run a close 2nd.
When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.
Good Morning Yumbo!
I knew you were going to be on top of this first thing. I think the Italian banks are going to do the “bail-in” thing eventually just like Cyprus. I don’t see any other way out for them.
Last month I moved some investments assets into bonds (BIG MISTAKE) I lost over $600 in one week. I don’t know what I was thinking. I usually don’t make stupid mistakes like that but…
Hi PP
You are spot on – a bail-in looks inevitable. Sorry about your bonds man. We all make mistakes.
I am writing the second part to this with the options Italy faces in the coming year. I hope to point out sufficient red flags to indicate which way the economy is moving, in the interim.
I will then be covering each of the EU countries in turn under Money. But I have a special on the anti-immigration countries you asked for sometime this week.
I need to complete the CoD Infinite War SP campaign first – know you understand.
Also I have been told that 15th Dec 2016 Fed will raise rates and something bad is very likely going to happen to the markets soon after. Watch out for that and be prepared to take your money out.
know you understand.
Absolutely brother! Rock on!
All my retirement $$ has been moved to treasury notes/securities. Pays about 1.5% interest but is at least the safest of the options.
PP
Great.
At this point Treasuries is the safe place to be.
Stay well.
Anonymous0Looking forward to your next post
Keep it up, Yumbo- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678